Influence of adhesive application on shear bond strength of the resin cement to indirect resin composite

Mi-Hae Song; Su-Jung Park; Hyun-Gu Cho; Yun-Chan Hwang; Won-Mann Oh; In-Nam Hwang

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.419

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 33(5); 2008 > Article

Original Article Influence of adhesive application on shear bond strength of the resin cement to indirect resin composite: Mi-Hae Song, Su-Jung Park, Hyun-Gu Cho, Yun-Chan Hwang, Won-Mann Oh, In-Nam Hwang; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2008;33(5):419-427.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.419
Published online: September 30, 2008

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: In-Nam Hwang. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, 5 Hak-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-4443, Fax: 82-62-225-8387, hinso@jnu.ac.kr

• Received: April 22, 2008 • Revised: May 20, 2008 • Accepted: July 17, 2008

20 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

This study analyzed the influence of dental adhesive/primer on the bond strength between indirect resin composite and the resin cement.

Seventy disc specimens of indirect resin composite (Tescera Dentin, Bisco) were fabricated. And bonding area of all specimens were sandblasted and silane treated for one minute. The resin cements were used with or without application of adhesive/primer to bonding area of indirect resin restoration: Variolink-II (Ivoclar-Vivadent): Exite DSC, Panavia-F (Kuraray): ED-Primer, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE): Single-Bond, Duolink (Bisco): One-step, Mulitlink (Ivoclar-Vivadent): Multilinh Primer.

Shear bond strength was measured by Instron universal testing machine.

Adhesive application improved shear bond strength (p < 0.05). But Variolink II and Panavia-F showed no statistically significant difference according to the adhesive application.

With the above results, when resin inlay is luted by resin cement it seems that application of dental adhesive/primer is necessary in order to improve the bond strength.
Keywords: Resin inlay; Resin cement; Shear bond strength; Surface treatment; Primer; Bonding agent

REFERENCES

1. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 2002;3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 377.
2. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements; marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 347-353.Article PubMed
3. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000;13: 60D-76D.PubMed
4. Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1995;7: 228-232.Article PubMed
5. Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int. 1995;26: 293-300.PubMed
6. Jensen ME, Sheth JJ, Tolliver D. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded full veneer crowns: in vitro fracture resistance. Compendium. 1989;10: 336-338.PubMed
7. Jacobsen PH, Rees JS. Luting agent for ceramic and polymeric inlays and onlays. Int Dent J. 1992;42: 145-149.PubMed
8. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Carrilho MR. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain dentin bonding using dual cure cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81: 285-289.Article PubMed
9. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation mode. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29: 257-262.PubMed
10. Hahn P, Attin T, Grofke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 191-196.Article PubMed
11. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Katahira N, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of three resin cements to dentin over 3 years in vitro. J Dent. 2001;29: 139-144.PubMed
12. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light cured adhesives and chemical cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 542-556.Article PubMed
13. Yanagawa T, Finger WJ. Relationship between degree of polymerization of resin composite and bond strength to Gluma-treated dentin. Am J Dent. 1994;7: 157-160.PubMed
14. Kelsey WP 3rd, Triolo PT, Blankenau RJ, Kelsey MN, Ortmeier C, Hauser D. Bond strengths to enamel and dentin with indirect and direct resin composites. Am J Dent. 1996;9: 105-108.PubMed
15. Nikaido T, Nakajima M, Higashi T, Kanemura N, Pereira PN, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths of a single-step bonding system to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater J. 1997;16: 40-47.Article PubMed
16. Watanabe EK, Yamashita A, Yatani H, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Improvement in the tensile bond strength between resin cement and dentin surfaces after temporary cement application. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11: 203-211.PubMed
17. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 120-128.PubMed
18. Davies B, Dunne SM, Mokhfari M, Nicholson J. A comparison of the shear bond strength of composite resin bonded by a fourth and fifth generation dentin adhesive to bovine teeth. Prim Dent Care. 1999;6: 103-106.PubMed
19. Mondragon E, Soderholm KJ. Shear strength of dentin and bonded composites. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3: 227-236.PubMed
20. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3: 237-245.PubMed
21. Suliman JF, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effect of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70: 118-120.PubMed
22. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effect of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res. 1995;74: 381-387.Article PubMed PDF
23. Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cure cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72: 85-88.PubMed
24. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72: 355-359.PubMed
25. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76: 119-124.PubMed
26. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79: 508-513.Article PubMed
27. Madani M, Chu FC, McDonald AV, Smales RJ. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83: 644-647.PubMed
28. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995;74: 1591-1596.Article PubMed PDF
29. Jackson RD, Ferguson RW. An asthetic bonded inlay/onlay technique for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int. 1990;21: 7-12.PubMed
30. Sheth PJ. Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quintessence Int. 1989;20: 831-836.PubMed
31. Craig RG. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Overview of posterior composite resins for use in clinical practice. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. 1985;St. Paul: 3M Co; 199-211.
32. Lopes LMP, Leitao JGM, Douglas WM. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int. 1991;22: 641-645.PubMed
33. Kang HS, Choi HY. A Study on the Marginal Leakage of Class II Composite Resin Inlay. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1992;17: 191-205.
34. Douglas WH, Fields RP, Fundingsland J. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent. 1989;17: 184-188.Article PubMed
35. Kanca J 3rd. Composite resin luting materials: A rationale for the "90s". J Esthet Dent. 1989;1: 105-109.Article PubMed
36. Heymann HO. Indirect composite resin veneers: an alternative, Porcelain laminate veneers. 1998;Quintessence books; 126-133.

Figure 1

Diagram of the prepared specimens.

Figure 2

Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations according to the surface treatment.

^*Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), VL: VL + silane, VL-B: VL + silane + Bonding agents

Figure 3

Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to silane treated indirect resin restorations (p < 0.01).

^*Statistically no significant difference.

Figure 4

Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations treated with silane and adhesives or primers.

Table 1

Resin cements and indirect composite system used in study

All information provided by manufacturers. Bis-GMA: bis-phenol-A-diglycidyl methacrylate, UDMA: urethane dimethacrylate, TEGDMA: triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate, HEMA: 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, MDP: methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate

Table 2

Conditioning agents used in study

Table 3

Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations (n=7)

Table 4

Failure mode distribution

S : silane treated only

S+P : Treated with silane and primers

S+A : Treated with silane and adhesives

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Influence of adhesive application on shear bond strength of the resin cement to indirect resin composite

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008;33(5):419-427. Published online September 30, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.419

XML Download

Figure

Influence of adhesive application on shear bond strength of the resin cement to indirect resin composite

Figure 1 Diagram of the prepared specimens.

Figure 2 Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations according to the surface treatment. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), VL: VL + silane, VL-B: VL + silane + Bonding agents

Figure 3 Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to silane treated indirect resin restorations (p < 0.01). *Statistically no significant difference.

Figure 4 Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations treated with silane and adhesives or primers.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Influence of adhesive application on shear bond strength of the resin cement to indirect resin composite

Table 1

Resin cements and indirect composite system used in study

Table 2

Conditioning agents used in study

Table 3

Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations (n=7)

Table 4

Failure mode distribution

S : silane treated only

S+P : Treated with silane and primers

S+A : Treated with silane and adhesives

Table 1 Resin cements and indirect composite system used in study

Table 2 Conditioning agents used in study

Table 3 Shear bond strength of the five resin cements to indirect resin restorations (n=7)

Table 4 Failure mode distribution

S : silane treated only

S+P : Treated with silane and primers

S+A : Treated with silane and adhesives