Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Microtensile bonding of one-step adhesives to smeared and non-smeared dentin
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Search
Advanced Search
OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 27(3); 2002 > Article
Original Article Microtensile bonding of one-step adhesives to smeared and non-smeared dentin
Yong-Beom Song, Jeong-Hee Jin, Se-Joon Lee, Kwang-Won Lee
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2002;27(3):299-309.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.3.299
Published online: May 31, 2002

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Korea.

Copyright © 2002 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 18 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • The purposes of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step adhesives according to various dentin surface treatments and to observe the interface between resin(Z-100™) and dentin under SEM.
    In this study forty-five non-caries extracted human molars and three adhesive systems were used; All-Bond 2(AB), One-Up Bond F(OU), AQ-Bond(AQ).; In Group 1, 2, 3, AB was used and tooth surfaces were treated by smearing(S), ultrasonic cleansing(US), etching(E) respectively. In Group 4, 5, 6, One-Up Bond F was used and tooth surfaces were also treated as the same way above. In Groups 7, 8, 9, AQ Bond was used and tooth surfaces were treated as the same way. Each specimen was prepared for microtensile bond testing, and were stored for 24hrs in 37℃ distilled water. After that, microtensile bond strength for each specimen was measured. Specimens were fabricated to examine the failure patterns of interface between resin and dentin and observed under the SEM.
    The results were as follows;
    1. The results(mean±SD) of microtensile test were group 1, 25.69±4.31MPa; group 2, 40.93±10.94MPa; group 3, 47.65±8.85MPa; group 4, 36.98±9.14MPa; group 5, 39.66±8.45MPa; group 6, 43.26±13.01MPa; group 7, 25.07±4.2MPa; group 8, 30.4±4.74MPa; group 9, 33.61±7.88MPa.
    2. One-Up Bond F was showed the highest value of 36.98±9.14MPa in dentin surface treatment with smearing, and there were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).
    3. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 40.93±10.94MPa in dentin surface treatment with ultrasonic cleansing, but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05).
    4. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65±8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment with etching(10%phosphoric acid), and there were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).
    5. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65±8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment according to manufacture's directions, but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05).
    6. AQ Bond was showed the lowest microtensile bond strength with various dentin surface treatment, and the were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).
  • 1. Buonocore M. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1995;34: 849-853.ArticlePDF
  • 2. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test : a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(4):299-309.PubMed
  • 3. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998 06;14: 194-201.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Chappell R, Schreiner R, Glaros A, Eixk J. Pilot study to determine sample size for micro-tensile testing. J Dent Res. 1997;76: 38. Abstr. no. 193.
  • 5. Sano H, Sonoda H, Shono J, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between suface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength -Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994;10: 236-240.PubMed
  • 6. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res. 1994;73: 1205-1211.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 7. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of resin-infiltrated demineralized human dentin. J Dent Res. 1995;74: 1093-1102.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 8. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PNR, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78: 906-911.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 9. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 194-202.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of surface area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater. 1997;13: 290-296.PubMed
  • 11. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 001 Jan-Feb;26(1):97-104.
  • 12. Samsri S, Van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent. 1999;1: 57-67.PubMed
  • 13. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent. 1989;17: 61-67.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin. J Dent Res. 1997;76: 1298-1307.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 15. Pashey DH, Samo H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents : A Review. Dent Mater. 1995;11: 117-125.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Cardoso PEC, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of microtensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1999;14: 394-398.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth states. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16: 265-273.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives The Physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol. 1967;12: 1615-1620.PubMed
  • 19. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol. 1968;13: 61-70.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Simmelink JW, Nygaard VK, Scott DB. Penetration of resins in0to partially demineralized enamel in vivo. Arch Oral Biol. 1974;18: 435-439.
  • 21. Gwinnet AJ, Ripa LW. Penetration of pit and fissure sealants into conditioned enamel in vivo. Arch Oral Biol. 1973;18: 435-439.PubMed
  • 22. Wakabayashi H, Kondo Y, Suzuki K, Yatani H, Ymashita A. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7: 302-306.PubMed
  • 23. Kanca J. Wet bond. Effect of drying tome and distance. Am J Dent. 1996;9: 273-276.PubMed
  • 24. Gwinnet AG, Tay FR, Wei SHY. In: Shino M, Maeda T, Suda H, Takayashi K, editors. Bridging the gap between overly dry and overwet bonding phenomenon of dentin hybridization and tubular seal. Dentin/pulp complex. 1996;Tokyo: Quintessence; 359-363.
  • 25. Suzuki M, Kato H, Wakumoto S. Vibrational analysis by Raman spectroscopy of the interface between dental adhesive resin and dentin. J Dent Res. 1991;70: 1092-1097.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 26. Sano H, Shono t, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent. 1994;19: 59-64.PubMed
  • 27. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentin permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent. 1997;25: 355-372.PubMed
  • 28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 296-308.PubMed
  • 29. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 1706-1715.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 30. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V reatorations. Am J Dent. 1997;10: 66-70.PubMed
  • 31. Watanable I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res. 1994;73: 1212-1220.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 32. Hume WR. Influence of dentine on the pulpward release of eugenol or acids from restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21: 469-473.ArticlePubMed
  • 33. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Effect of smear layer on bonding to ground dentin-relationship between grinding condition and tensile bond strength. Dent Mater J. 1994;13: 101-108.
  • 34. Toida T, Watanabe A, Nakabayashi N. Effect of smear layer on bonding to dentin prepared with bur. Dent Mater J. 1995;14: 109-116.PubMed
  • 35. Miyasaka K, Nakabayashi N. Combination of EDTA conditioner and Phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dental Materials. 1999;15: 153-157.PubMed
  • 36. Eliades G, Vougiouklakis G, Palaghias G. Heterogeneous distribution of single-bottle adhesive monomers in th resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 277-288.PubMed
  • 37. Sano H, Uno S, Inous S. In: Sano H, Uno S, Inous S, editors. Clinical considerations of dentin adhesion. Modern trends in adhesive dentistry. 1998;Osaka: Kuraray; 1-13.
  • 38. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Natthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995;20: 18-25.PubMed
  • 39. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent. 1994;19: 59-64.PubMed
  • 40. Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Burrow MF, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nonoleakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995;20: 160-170.PubMed
  • 41. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface : its influence on dentinal adhesion III. Quintessence Int. 1993;24(8):571-574.PubMed
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of the microtensile test
jkacd-27-299-g001.jpg
Fig. 2
Microtensile tester
jkacd-27-299-g002.jpg
Fig. 3
Tensile Bond Strengths(MPa) of Adhesives Using Various Surface Treatments
jkacd-27-299-g003.jpg
Fig. 4
Tensile Bond Strength(MPa) According to Various Surface Treatments
jkacd-27-299-g004.jpg
Fig. 5
Tensile Bond Strengths(MPa) of Adhesives According to Manufacture s Directions
jkacd-27-299-g005.jpg
Fig. 6
Failure pattern
jkacd-27-299-g006.jpg
Fig. 7
All Bond 2 Smearing SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:resin, 2:dentin, 3:separated resin
jkacd-27-299-g007.jpg
Fig. 8
All Bond 2 Ultrasonic cleaning SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:resin, 2:separated resin
jkacd-27-299-g008.jpg
Fig. 9
All Bond 2 Etching SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:dentin, 2:bonding agent, 3:resin, 4:separated resin
jkacd-27-299-g009.jpg
Fig. 10
One-Up Bond F Smearing SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:bonding agent, 2:resin
jkacd-27-299-g010.jpg
Fig. 11
One-Up Bond F Ultrasonic cleaning SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:dentin, 2:resin, 3:separated dentin
jkacd-27-299-g011.jpg
Fig. 12
One-Up Bond F Etching SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:separated dentin, 2:dentin, 3:resin, 4:dentin
jkacd-27-299-g012.jpg
Fig. 13
AQ Bond Smearing SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:separated resin, 2:dentin, 3:resin, 4:separated dentin
jkacd-27-299-g013.jpg
Fig. 14
AQ Bond Ultrasonic cleaning SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
jkacd-27-299-g014.jpg
Fig. 15
AQ Bond Etching SEM
A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
1:dentin, 2:separated resin, 3:separated dentin, 4:resin, 5:bonding agent
jkacd-27-299-g015.jpg
Table 1
Materals used in this study
jkacd-27-299-i001.jpg
Table 2
Group classification
jkacd-27-299-i002.jpg
Table 3
Microtensile bond strength of various surface treatments
jkacd-27-299-i003.jpg
Table 4
Comparison of microtensile strength in groups according to various surf. tx.

P<0.05 (One-Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferrori)

jkacd-27-299-i004.jpg
Table 5
Comparison of microtensile strength in surface treatments according to various adhesives.

P<0.05 (One-Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferrori)

jkacd-27-299-i005.jpg
Table 6
Failure pattern of dentin to resin under SEM
jkacd-27-299-i006.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Microtensile bonding of one-step adhesives to smeared and non-smeared dentin
        J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27(3):299-309.   Published online May 31, 2002
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.3.299
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      • 3
      • 4
      • 5
      • 6
      • 7
      • 8
      • 9
      • 10
      • 11
      • 12
      • 13
      • 14
      Microtensile bonding of one-step adhesives to smeared and non-smeared dentin
      Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
      Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the microtensile test
      Fig. 2 Microtensile tester
      Fig. 3 Tensile Bond Strengths(MPa) of Adhesives Using Various Surface Treatments
      Fig. 4 Tensile Bond Strength(MPa) According to Various Surface Treatments
      Fig. 5 Tensile Bond Strengths(MPa) of Adhesives According to Manufacture s Directions
      Fig. 6 Failure pattern
      Fig. 7 All Bond 2 Smearing SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:resin, 2:dentin, 3:separated resin
      Fig. 8 All Bond 2 Ultrasonic cleaning SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:resin, 2:separated resin
      Fig. 9 All Bond 2 Etching SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:dentin, 2:bonding agent, 3:resin, 4:separated resin
      Fig. 10 One-Up Bond F Smearing SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:bonding agent, 2:resin
      Fig. 11 One-Up Bond F Ultrasonic cleaning SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:dentin, 2:resin, 3:separated dentin
      Fig. 12 One-Up Bond F Etching SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:separated dentin, 2:dentin, 3:resin, 4:dentin
      Fig. 13 AQ Bond Smearing SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:separated resin, 2:dentin, 3:resin, 4:separated dentin
      Fig. 14 AQ Bond Ultrasonic cleaning SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface.
      Fig. 15 AQ Bond Etching SEM A:fractured dental surface, B:fractured resin surface. 1:dentin, 2:separated resin, 3:separated dentin, 4:resin, 5:bonding agent

      Fig. 1

      Fig. 2

      Fig. 3

      Fig. 4

      Fig. 5

      Fig. 6

      Fig. 7

      Fig. 8

      Fig. 9

      Fig. 10

      Fig. 11

      Fig. 12

      Fig. 13

      Fig. 14

      Fig. 15

      Microtensile bonding of one-step adhesives to smeared and non-smeared dentin

      Materals used in this study

      Group classification

      Microtensile bond strength of various surface treatments

      Comparison of microtensile strength in groups according to various surf. tx.

      P<0.05 (One-Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferrori)

      Comparison of microtensile strength in surface treatments according to various adhesives.

      P<0.05 (One-Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferrori)

      Failure pattern of dentin to resin under SEM
      Table 1 Materals used in this study

      Table 2 Group classification

      Table 3 Microtensile bond strength of various surface treatments

      Table 4 Comparison of microtensile strength in groups according to various surf. tx.

      P<0.05 (One-Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferrori)

      Table 5 Comparison of microtensile strength in surface treatments according to various adhesives.

      P<0.05 (One-Way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferrori)

      Table 6 Failure pattern of dentin to resin under SEM

      Table 1

      Table 2

      Table 3

      Table 4

      Table 5

      Table 6

      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      © The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
      Close layer
      TOP