Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength

Hee-Young Kang; Young-Gon Cho; Jong-Uk Kim; Byung-Cheul Park; Sang-Hoon Yoo; Cheul-Hee Jin; Hee-Young Choi; Young-Jae Ki

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.153

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 29(2); 2004 > Article

Original Article Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength: Hee-Young Kang, Young-Gon Cho, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park, Sang-Hoon Yoo, Cheul-Hee Jin, Hee-Young Choi, Young-Jae Ki; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2004;29(2):153-161.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.153
Published online: March 31, 2004

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 375 Susuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-759, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

16 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

This study investigated that the effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength (µTBS). Human molars were sectioned to expose the superficial dentin surfaces.

Samples were divided into two groups according to type of adhesives-Single Bond (S) and One-Step (O)], and again subdivided into five groups by different dentin surface treatment-dry for 15s (D), blot dry (BD) or dry for 15s, and rewet with different rewetting agents [distilled water (DW), Gluma Desensitizer (GD) and Aqua-Prep (AP)] for 30s. After application of adhesive, composite resin was built up on the bonding surface. Each tooth was sectioned to obtain stick with 1 mm² cross sectional area and the µTBS was determined by EZ test.

In the S group, the mean µTBS of GD, AP and BD group was significantly higher than that of DW and D group (p < 0.05). In the O group, the mean µTBS of AP, GD, BD and DW group was significantly higher than that of D group (p < 0.05).

The data suggested that Gluma Desensitizer and Aqua-Prep could be successfully used as rewetting agents, and Distilled water could be acceptable in aceton based adhesive system only.
Keywords: Microtensile bond strength; One-bottle adhesive; Rewetting agent; Distilled water; Gluma Desensitizer; Aqua-Prep

REFERENCES

1. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL Jr. Microleakage of hydrophillic systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2001;14(1):31-34.PubMed
2. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I. Bond strength of single bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent. 2000;25: 2-10.PubMed
3. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer-adhesives. Dent Mater. 1996;12: 236-244.Article PubMed
4. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent. 2000;13(6):324-328.PubMed
5. Perdigão J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re-wetting agent on the performance of acetone-based dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 1998;11: 207-213.PubMed
6. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int. 2001;32(5):385-390.PubMed
7. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent. 1992;5: 127-129.PubMed
8. Kanca J. Effect of drying on bonding strength. J Dent Res. 1991;70: 304. (Abstract 1029).
9. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent. 1994;7(3):144-148.PubMed
10. Marshall GW, Watanabe LG, Wu-Magidi IL. AFM study of drying and rehydration of etched dentin. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 390.
11. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible re-wetting. Am J Dent. 1997;10: 77-82.PubMed
12. Perdigao J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater. 1999;15: 282-295.PubMed
13. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effects of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(2):85-96.Article PubMed
14. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono T, Fernades CA, Tay F. The micro-tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1: 299-309.PubMed
15. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. J Esthet Dent. 1994;6: 227-244.PubMed
16. Chappell RP, Schreiner RF, Glaros AG, Eixk J. Pilot study of determine sample size for micro-tensile testing. J Dent Res. 1997;76: 38. (Abstract 193).
17. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. J Dent Res. 1995;74: 1093-1102.Article PubMed
18. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Erick JD. Microtensile testing of dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998;14(3):194-201.PubMed
19. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Horner JA, Phashley DH. Tensile bond strength versus surface area for dentin bonding-Evaluation of a method using limited surface areas. J Conserv Dent. 1994;37: 882-887.
20. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1992;8: 229-233.PubMed
21. Cho YG, Park YY, Lee YG. Effect of a rewetting agent on dentin adhesion. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003;28(1):11-22.Article
22. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16: 265-273.PubMed
23. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE. Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strenghs and hybrid layer formation. Am J Dent. 2001;14(5):319-323.PubMed
24. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int. 1993;24(8):571-582.PubMed
25. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995;11: 117-125.Article PubMed
26. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR. In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strength of one-bottle adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(1):31-38.PubMed
27. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28: 215-235.PubMed
28. Suzuke K, Takahashi M, Nakai H. Treatment of dentin by aqueous solution of amino acid derivatives: HEMA. J Adhes Dent. 1990;8: 43-51.
29. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengths of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 394-398.PubMed
30. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagatun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater. 2002;18: 359-369.PubMed
31. Nunes MF, Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to humam dentin. Am J Dent. 2001;14: 340-343.PubMed
32. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas M. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 212-222.PubMed
33. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent. 1992;5: 213-215.PubMed
34. Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent. 1996;9: 273-276.PubMed
35. Carvalho RM, Yoshima M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41: 369-377.PubMed
36. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water free adhesive primers.. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 1034-1044.PubMed
37. Gallo JR, Henderson M, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000;13(5):267-270.PubMed
38. Kanca J 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(1):39-41.PubMed
39. Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent. 1998;11(5):225-228.PubMed
40. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 1851-1858.PubMed
41. Harashima I, Hirasawa T. Adsorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater J. 1990;9: 36-46.Article PubMed
42. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effects of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater. 1992;8: 125-130.PubMed
43. Nakabayashi N, Watanae A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater. 1992;8: 259-264.PubMed
44. Sugizaki J. The effects of various primers on dentin adhesion of resin composites. SEM and TEM observation of the resin impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primer. Jap J Cons Dent. 1991;34: 228-265.
45. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Improved efficacy of dentin bonding agents. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105(5 Pt 1):434-439.Article PubMed

Figure 1

Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2

EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to adhesives and dentin surface treatment

Table 1

Chemical formulations of the adhesive systems used

Bis-GMA = bisphenol-glysidyl-methacrylate, HEMA = 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2

Chemical formulations of the rewetting agent used

Table 3

The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis of each adhesive in different dentin surface treatment

S: Single Bond, O: One-Step

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 4

The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) according to different dentin treatment and statistical analysis

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29(2):153-161. Published online March 31, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.153

XML Download

Figure

Related articles

Effect of an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent on the dentin shear bond strength of a universal adhesive

Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength

Figure 1 Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2 EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3 Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to adhesives and dentin surface treatment

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength

Table 1

Chemical formulations of the adhesive systems used

Bis-GMA = bisphenol-glysidyl-methacrylate, HEMA = 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2

Chemical formulations of the rewetting agent used

Table 3

The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis of each adhesive in different dentin surface treatment

S: Single Bond, O: One-Step

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 4

The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) according to different dentin treatment and statistical analysis

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 1 Chemical formulations of the adhesive systems used

Bis-GMA = bisphenol-glysidyl-methacrylate, HEMA = 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2 Chemical formulations of the rewetting agent used

Table 3 The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis of each adhesive in different dentin surface treatment

S: Single Bond, O: One-Step

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 4 The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) according to different dentin treatment and statistical analysis

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).