Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Longevity"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Articles
A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations
Muhittin Ugurlu, Fatmanur Sari
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(1):e5.   Published online December 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e5
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to assess the clinical longevity of a bulk-fill resin composite in Class II restorations for 3-year.

Materials and Methods

Patient record files acquired from the 40 patients who were treated due to needed 2 similar sizes Class II composite restorations were used for this retrospective study. In the experimental cavity, the flowable resin composite SDR was inserted in the dentinal part as a 4 mm intermediate layer. A 2 mm coverage layer with a nano-hybrid resin composite (CeramX) was placed on SDR. The control restoration was performed by an incremental technique of 2 mm using the nano-hybrid resin composite. The restorations were blindly assessed by 2 calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 years. The data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (p = 0.05).

Results

Eighty Class II restorations were evaluated. After 3-years, 4 restorations (5%) failed, 1 SDR + CeramX, and 3 CeramX restorations. The annual failure rate (AFR) of the restorations was 1.7%. The SDR + CeramX group revealed an AFR of 0.8%, and the CeramX group an AFR of 2.5% (p > 0.05). Regarding anatomical form and marginal adaptation, significant alterations were observed in the CeramX group after 3-years (p < 0.05). The changes in the color match were observed in each group over time (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The use of SDR demonstrated good clinical durability in deep Class II resin composite restorations.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of New Generation Bulk-Fill Composites
    Zehra SÜSGÜN YILDIRIM, Ezgi SONKAYA, Zeliha Gonca BEK KÜRKLÜ
    Cumhuriyet Dental Journal.2023; 26(2): 180.     CrossRef
  • Damping Behaviour and Mechanical Properties of Restorative Materials for Primary Teeth
    Thomas Niem, Roland Frankenberger, Stefanie Amend, Bernd Wöstmann, Norbert Krämer
    Materials.2022; 15(21): 7698.     CrossRef
  • 239 View
  • 9 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
The influence of nanofillers on the properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives
Leonardo Bairrada Tavares da Cruz, Marcelo Tavares Oliveira, Cintia Helena Coury Saraceni, Adriano Fonseca Lima
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(3):e28.   Published online July 24, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e28
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different concentrations of nanofillers on the chemical and physical properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives.

Materials and Methods

Eight experimental adhesives were prepared with different nanofiller concentrations (0, 1, 2, and 4 wt%) and 2 solvent concentrations (0% and 10% ethanol). Several properties of the experimental adhesives were evaluated, such as water sorption and solubility (n = 5, 20 seconds light activation), real-time degree of conversion (DC; n = 3, 20 and 40 seconds light activation), and stability of cohesive strength at 6 months (CS; n = 20, 20 seconds light activation) using the microtensile test. A light-emitting diode (Bluephase 20i, Ivoclar Vivadent) with an average light emittance of 1,200 mW/cm2 was used.

Results

The presence of solvent reduced the DC after 20 seconds of curing, but increased the final DC, water sorption, and solubility of the adhesives. Storage in water reduced the strength of the adhesives. The addition of 1 wt% and 2 wt% nanofillers increased the polymerization rate of the adhesives.

Conclusions

The presence of nanofillers and ethanol improved the final DC, although the DC of the solvated adhesives at 20 seconds was lower than that of the non-solvated adhesives. The presence of ethanol reduced the strength of the adhesives and increased their water sorption and solubility. However, nanofillers did not affect the water sorption and strength of the tested adhesives.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development of a Boron Nitride-Filled Dental Adhesive System
    Senthilguru Kulanthaivel, Jeremiah Poppen, Sandra Ribeiro Cunha, Benjamin Furman, Kyumin Whang, Erica C. Teixeira
    Polymers.2023; 15(17): 3512.     CrossRef
  • Analyses of Experimental Dental Adhesives Based on Zirconia/Silver Phosphate Nanoparticles
    Abdul Khan, Yasmin Alhamdan, Hala Alibrahim, Khalid Almulhim, Muhammad Nawaz, Syed Ahmed, Khalid Aljuaid, Ijlal Ateeq, Sultan Akhtar, Mohammad Ansari, Intisar Siddiqui
    Polymers.2023; 15(12): 2614.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical characterization and adhesive properties of a dental adhesive modified with a polymer antibiotic conjugate
    Camila Sabatini, Russell J. Aguilar, Ziwen Zhang, Steven Makowka, Abhishek Kumar, Megan M. Jones, Michelle B. Visser, Mark Swihart, Chong Cheng
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2022; 129: 105153.     CrossRef
  • 189 View
  • 3 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Researchs
The effect of clinical performance on the survival estimates of direct restorations
Kyou-Li Kim, Cheol Namgung, Byeong-Hoon Cho
Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(1):11-20.   Published online February 26, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.11
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

In most retrospective studies, the clinical performance of restorations had not been considered in survival analysis. This study investigated the effect of including the clinically unacceptable cases according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria into the failed data on the survival analysis of direct restorations as to the longevity and prognostic variables.

Materials and Methods

Nine hundred and sixty-seven direct restorations were evaluated. The data of 204 retreated restorations were collected from the records, and clinical performance of 763 restorations in function was evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria by two observers. The longevity and prognostic variables of the restorations were compared with a factor of involving clinically unacceptable cases into the failures using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

The median survival times of amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer were 11.8, 11.0 and 6.8 years, respectively. Glass ionomer showed significantly lower longevity than composite resin and amalgam. When clinically unacceptable restorations were included into the failure, the median survival times of them decreased to 8.9, 9.7 and 6.4 years, respectively.

Conclusions

After considering the clinical performance, composite resin was the only material that showed a difference in the longevity (p < 0.05) and the significantly higher relative risk of student group than professor group disappeared in operator groups. Even in the design of retrospective study, clinical evaluation needs to be included.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Decision‐Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational Cross‐Sectional Study With Meta‐Analysis
    Ömer Hatipoğlu, João Filipe Brochado Martins, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Nessrin Taha, Thiyezen Abdullah Aldhelai, Daoud M. Ayyad, Ahmed A. Madfa, Benjamin Martin‐Biedma, Rafael Fernández‐Grisales, Bakhyt A. Omarova, Wen Yi Lim, Suha Alfirjani, Kacper Nijak
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Navigating the practical-knowledge gap in deep margin elevation: A step towards a structured case selection – a review
    Eman H. Ismail, Saba S. Ghazal, Rahaf D. Alshehri, Hajar N. Albisher, Rana S. Albishri, Abdulrahman A. Balhaddad
    The Saudi Dental Journal.2024; 36(5): 674.     CrossRef
  • A review of dental antibacterial agents and antibacterial modification of composite resins and dentin adhesives
    Hojin Moon
    Korean Journal of Dental Materials.2024; 51(4): 189.     CrossRef
  • Er:YAG laser in selective caries removal and dentin treatment with chitosan: a randomized clinical trial in primary molars
    Rai Matheus Carvalho Santos, Renata Siqueira Scatolin, Sérgio Luiz de Souza Salvador, Aline Evangelista Souza-Gabriel, Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona
    Lasers in Medical Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials
    Flávio Fernando Demarco, Maximiliano Sergio Cenci, Anelise Fernandes Montagner, Verônica Pereira de Lima, Marcos Britto Correa, Rafael R. Moraes, Niek J.M. Opdam
    Dental Materials.2023; 39(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keda Fang, Kenan Chen, Mengqi Shi, Liang Wang
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2023; 27(6): 2495.     CrossRef
  • Survival of direct resin composite onlays and indirect tooth-coloured adhesive onlays in posterior teeth: a systematic review
    Colin E. McGrath, Stephen J. Bonsor
    British Dental Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A 2-year clinical evaluation of direct and semi-direct resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomized clinical study
    Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele, Laura Célia Fernandes Meirelles, Rafael Santos Rocha, Lucélia Lemes Gonçalves, Daniele Mara Silva Ávila, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves, Eduardo Bresciani
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2020; 24(3): 1321.     CrossRef
  • Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Bruna M. Vetromilla, Niek J. Opdam, Ferdinan L. Leida, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre, Flavio F. Demarco, Mark P.J. van der Loo, Maximiliano S. Cenci, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
    The Journal of the American Dental Association.2020; 151(8): 614.     CrossRef
  • Effect of a novel prime‐and‐rinse approach on short‐ and long‐term dentin bond strength of self‐etch adhesives
    Mingxing Li, Jingqiu Xu, Ling Zhang, Chaoyang Wang, Xiaoting Jin, Yan Hong, Baiping Fu, Matthias Hannig
    European Journal of Oral Sciences.2019; 127(6): 547.     CrossRef
  • Longevity of resin-bonded fixed partial dental prostheses made with metal alloys
    Naomi Tanoue
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2016; 20(6): 1329.     CrossRef
  • Amalgam vs Composite Restoration, Survival, and Secondary Caries
    Muhanad Alhareky, Mary Tavares
    Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice.2016; 16(2): 107.     CrossRef
  • Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial
    G. Moncada, E. Fernández, K. Mena, J. Martin, P. Vildósola, O.B. De Oliveira, J. Estay, I.A. Mjör, V.V. Gordan
    Journal of Dentistry.2015; 43(11): 1371.     CrossRef
  • Longitudinal Results of a 10-year Clinical Trial of Repair of Amalgam Restorations
    G Moncada, P Vildósola, E Fernández, J Estay, OB de Oliveira Júnior, MF de Andrade, J Martin, IA Mjör, VV Gordan
    Operative Dentistry.2015; 40(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vittorio Moraschini, Cheung Ka Fai, Raphael Monte Alto, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos
    Journal of Dentistry.2015; 43(9): 1043.     CrossRef
  • Aumento de longevidad de restauraciones de resinas compuestas y de su unión adhesiva. Revisión de tema
    Gustavo Moncada, Patricio Vildósola, Eduardo Fernandez, Juan Estay, Osmir B de Oliveira Junior, Javier Martin
    Revista Facultad de Odontología.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparison of resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite polymerisation shrinkage stress in a wet environment
    Joshua J. Cheetham, Joseph E.A. Palamara, Martin J. Tyas, Michael F. Burrow
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2014; 29: 33.     CrossRef
  • 248 View
  • 1 Download
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
The evaluation of clinical efficacy and longevity of home bleaching without combined application of In-office bleaching
Byunk-Gyu Shin, Sung-Eun Yang
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35(5):387-394.   Published online September 30, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.387
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the whitening efficacy and longevity of home bleaching.

Materials and Methods

A total of 28 patients were divided into either experimental group (Opalescence F; 15% carbamide peroxide) or control group randomly. The patients in experimental group were instructed to wear individual trays applied with bleaching gel for 2 hours a day for 4 weeks. Any treatments weren't applied to the patients in control group. The color measurements of central incisors, lateral incisors & canines of upper and lower arch were recorded at base line, immediately after the finishment of treatmemt (4 weeks), 8 weeks and 12 weeks using Colorimeter (Chroma Meter, 2600d Konica Minolta co.) and Vitapan classical shade guide (Vita Zahnfabrik).

Results

A significantly stronger color change was observed for overall teeth samples in experimental group immediately after treatment (at 4 weeks) compared to ones in control group (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference between baseline and 8 weeks or 12 weeks separately though color rebouncing phenomenon occurred as time went by (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical effecacy and longevity of home bleaching without combined application of in-office bleaching was observed through this experiment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of Citrus limon Extract on Oxidative Stress-Induced Nitric Oxide Generation and Bovine Teeth Bleaching
    Soon-Jeong Jeong
    Journal of Dental Hygiene Science.2021; 21(2): 96.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of a self - applied paint - on whitening gel combined with wrap
    Soo-Yeon Kim, Jae-Hyun Ahn, Ji-Young Kim, Jin-Woo Kim, Se-Hee Park, Kyung-Mo Cho
    Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science.2018; 34(3): 175.     CrossRef
  • Home-based chemically-induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults
    Prashanti Eachempati, Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Salian Kiran Kumar Krishanappa, Puneet Gupta, Ibrahim Ethem Yaylali
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of preference drinks on tooth color reduction after tooth bleaching: A 12-momth follow-up study
    Hyo Jin Goo, Min Jeong Cho, Yun Sook Jung, Ji Hye Kim, Fan Dong, Keun Bae Song
    Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health.2016; 40(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • Tooth color reduction and consequent patient satisfaction after office and home bleaching: a 6-month follow-up study
    Hyo-Jin Goo, Hyeon-Sook Kwun, Jeong-Hee Park, Min-Jeong Cho, Eun-Kyong Kim, Youn-Hee Choi, Keun-Bae Song
    Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health.2015; 39(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • 153 View
  • 1 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP