Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Ugur Erdemir 1 Article
The influence of various adhesive applicators on the bond strength to dentin: an in vitro experimental study
Ahmed Alshawi, Benin Dikmen, Fadimeana Lal, Sevda Ozel Yildiz, Ugur Erdemir
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent ;Published online May 12, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2026.51.e30
AbstractAbstract PubReaderePub
Objectives
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of various adhesive applicators on the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of flowable resin composite to dentin.
Methods
Forty-two extracted molars were prepared as disks and divided into two groups. In the first group, GLUMA Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH) was applied to the tooth surface for 20 seconds using a bristle brush, while in the second group, the same adhesive was applied by the same operator using a microbrush. Photopolymerization was performed for 10 seconds using a Valo light-curing unit (Ultradent Products Inc.). Microcylindrical silicone tubes (2 mm long, 0.8 mm inner diameter) were used as molds on the bonded dentin surfaces, and Charisma Bulk Flow ONE resin composite (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH) was injected and cured for 20 seconds. Both groups underwent a µSBS test, and the failure modes were examined microscopically. Student’s t-test compared the failure stress between the groups (p < 0.05).
Results
The bristle brush group had the highest mean stress at failure (49.09 ± 8.76 MPa) compared to the microbrush group (37.20 ± 6.77 MPa), which also had the highest percentage of adhesive failure (95.24%).
Conclusions
The choice of adhesive applicator plays a decisive role in determining the µSBS of flowable resin composite to dentin. It is advisable to use a bristle brush applicator when applying adhesive.
  • 0 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP