Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Seonah Kim 2 Articles
Prevalence of referral reasons and clinical symptoms for endodontic referrals
Seonah Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2014;39(3):210-214.   Published online June 23, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.210
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

To investigate the prevalence of different primary reasons for endodontic referrals and the clinical symptoms of the referred cases.

Materials and Methods

Clinical data of total endodontic treatment cases (1,014 teeth) including endodontic referral cases (224 teeth) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012, at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, were investigated retrospectively. The one major reason for referral, the clinical symptoms, and the resulting treatment procedures of referral cases were recorded. The percentages of clinical symptoms of the endodontic referral cases and the total endodontic treatment cases were compared by χ2 test for each symptom.

Results

Persistent pain was the most frequent reason for endodontic referral (29.5%), followed by presence of gingival swelling and sinus tract (24.1%), and apical radiolucency (12.9%). Referrals in cases involving endodontic difficulties such as canal calcification, broken instruments, post, perforation, and resorption were less than 5.0%, respectively. The percentages of four major clinical symptoms of pain, apical radiolucency, previous endodontic treatment, and gingival swelling and sinus tract were significantly higher in the endodontic referral cases than those in the total endodontic cases (p = 0.001). Among the included referral cases, 72.8% were treated with nonsurgical endodontic treatment only. Teeth other than the referred teeth were diagnosed as the origin of the problem in 5.8% of the referrals.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of pain, apical radiolucency, previous treatment, and gingival swelling and sinus tract in endodontic referral cases suggest that these symptoms may be what general practitioners consider to be difficult and refer to endodontists.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • VARIABLES AFFECTING PATIENT REFERRALS FROM GENERAL DENTAL PRACTITIONERS TO ENDODONTISTS
    R. Peršić Bukmir, E Paljević, J. Vidas Hrstić, E Božac, I. Vidović Zdrilić, I. Brekalo Pršo
    Česká stomatologie a praktické zubní lékařství.2024; 124(4): 89.     CrossRef
  • The necessity and reasons for referrals to endodontists among general dentists in Mashhad: A cross-sectional study
    Maryam Gharechahi, Armita Rouhani, Amin Khazai Ahmadi, Mina Davaji
    Saudi Endodontic Journal.2024; 14(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • A comparison of endodontic referrals and treatment in the public and private sectors in Western Australia
    Charn Thanissorn, Johnson Ye, Daniel Girgis, Nathan van Dort, Paul V. Abbott
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2023; 49(S1): 390.     CrossRef
  • Case complexity of root canal treatments accepted for training in a secondary care setting assessed by three complexity grading systems: A service evaluation
    Ruby Long, Arindam Dutta, Matthew B. M. Thomas, Morgana Eli Vianna
    International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(11): 1190.     CrossRef
  • Comparing the pulp/tooth area ratio and dentin thickness of mandibular first molars in different age groups: A cone-beam computed tomography study
    Mathukan Chaleefong, Sangsom Prapayasatok, Sakarat Nalampang, Phumisak Louwakul
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(2): 166.     CrossRef
  • Survival of molar teeth in need of complex endodontic treatment: Influence of the endodontic treatment and quality of the restoration
    Maurits C.F.M. de Kuijper, Eric W. Meisberger, Amarins G. Rijpkema, Cathleen T. Fong, Jantien H.W. De Beus, Mutlu Özcan, Marco S. Cune, Marco M.M. Gresnigt
    Journal of Dentistry.2021; 108: 103611.     CrossRef
  • Novel tier 2 service model for complex NHS endodontics
    Gareth M. Thomas, Richard Newton, Warren J. Tolley, Karl Bishop
    British Dental Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Dentists’ Referral Patterns to Endodontist in Turkey
    Öznur SARIYILMAZ, Elif KALYONCUOĞLU
    Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science.2020; 6(2): 220.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of teeth referred to a dental university hospital for endodontic reason
    Su-Jin Jeon, Soo-Jeong Hwang, Min-Seock Seo
    Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science.2019; 35(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of teeth referred to a public dental specialist clinic in endodontics
    D. Sebring, H. Dimenäs, S. Engstrand, T. Kvist
    International Endodontic Journal.2017; 50(7): 629.     CrossRef
  • 183 View
  • 2 Download
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic factors influencing clinical outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment
Seonah Kim
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35(6):436-444.   Published online November 30, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.436
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to assess prospectively the clinical outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment and identify patient- and tooth-related factors, rather than treatment-related factors, that were the best predictors of this outcome.

Materials and Methods

The inception cohort comprised 441 teeth (320 patients) and 175 teeth (123 patients) were followed up for 1-2 years. Age, gender, presence of medical disease, number of canals, previous endodontic treatment, presence of sensitivity and pain, pulp vitality, swelling or sinus tract of pulpal origin on the gingiva, periapical radiolucency and tendency of unilateral bite on the affected tooth were recorded at treatment start.

Results

The outcome was classified on the basis of periapical radiolucency as healed or non healed. The overall healed rate in these cases, including nonsurgical retreatment, was 81.1%. Four tooth-related factors had a negative impact in the bivariate analysis: previous endodontic treatment, necrotic pulp, preoperative gingival swelling or sinus tract of pulpal origin, and preoperative periapical radiolucency. Stepwise logistic regression analysis including patient-, tooth-related factors and level of the root canal filling as a treatment-related factor showed that preoperative gingival lesion (odds ratio [OR]: 4.4; p = 0.005), preoperative periapical radiolucency (OR: 3.6; p = 0.011), and ≤ 1-2 mm under root filling length (OR: 9.6; p = 0.012) were significant predictors of failure.

Conclusions

A preoperative gingival lesion of pulpal origin can influence the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment in addition to preoperative periapical radiolucency.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A retrospective study on the prognostic factors and success, survival, and failure outcomes of treated endodontic‐periodontal lesions
    Ingar Wong, An Ton, Amiel J. Cassidy, Nicolette Fozzard, Lavanya Ajay Sharma, Robert M. Love, Ajay Sharma
    Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of gutta-percha removal from the dentinal tubules using different instrumentation techniques with or without solvent: An In vitro study
    MukeshKumar Hasija, Babita Meena, Deepti Wadhwa, KulvinderKaur Wadhwani, Virender Yadav
    Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization.2020; 12(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Surgical endodontic management of infected lateral canals of maxillary incisors
    Ji-Hyun Jang, Jung-Min Lee, Jin-Kyu Yi, Sung-Baik Choi, Sang-Hyuk Park
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2015; 40(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • 198 View
  • 1 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP