Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Sang Won Kwak 3 Articles
Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium files with a similar cross-section
Sang Won Kwak, Joo Yeong Lee, Hye-Jin Goo, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(3):216-223.   Published online June 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.216
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of various nickel-titanium (NiTi) files with similar tapers and cross-sectional areas depending on whether they were surface-treated.

Materials and Methods

Three NiTi file systems with a similar convex triangular cross-section and the same ISO #25 tip size were selected for this study: G6 (G6), ProTaper Universal (PTU), and Dia-PT (DPT). To test torsional resistance, 5 mm of the straightened file's tip was fixed between polycarbonate blocks (n = 15/group) and continuous clockwise rotation until fracture was conducted using a customized device. To evaluate cyclic fatigue resistance, files were rotated in an artificial curved canal until fracture in a dynamic mode (n = 15/group). The torsional data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post-hoc comparison test, while the cyclic fatigue data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test at a significance level of 95%.

Results

PTU showed significantly greater toughness, followed by DPT and G6 (p < 0.05). G6 showed the lowest resistance in ultimate torsional strength, while it showed a higher fracture angle than the other files (p < 0.05). In the cyclic fatigue test, DPT showed a significantly higher number of cycles to failure than PTU or G6 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the torsional resistance of NiTi files was affected by the cross-sectional area, while the cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi files was influenced by the surface treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • FARKLI YAPISAL ÖZELLİKTEKİ NİKEL-TİTANYUM KÖK KANAL EĞELERİNİN SODYUM HİPOKLORİT VE SERUM FİZYOLOJİK ÇÖZELTİLERİNDEKİ DÖNGÜSEL YORGUNLUK DİRENÇLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTİRİLMASI
    Abdulkadir ÖZŞAHİN, Meltem DARTAR ÖZTAN, Emine ODABAŞI TEZER
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Heat Treatment and Surface Treatment of Nickel–Titanium Endodontic Instruments
    Sang Won Kwak, Ya Shen, He Liu, Zhejun Wang, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Markus Haapasalo
    Frontiers in Dental Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Torsional Resistance of Two New Heat Treated Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments: An in Vitro Evaluation
    Gianluca Gambarini, Gabriele Miccoli, Dario Di Nardo, Andrea Del Giudice, Alessandro Mazzoni, Marco Seracchiani, Luca Testarelli
    Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 176 View
  • 0 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Screw-in forces during instrumentation by various file systems
Jung-Hong Ha, Sang Won Kwak, Sung-Kyo Kim, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(4):304-309.   Published online November 8, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.304
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum screw-in forces generated during the movement of various Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) file systems.

Materials and Methods

Forty simulated canals in resin blocks were randomly divided into 4 groups for the following instruments: Mtwo size 25/0.07 (MTW, VDW GmbH), Reciproc R25 (RPR, VDW GmbH), ProTaper Universal F2 (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer), and ProTaper Next X2 (PTN, Dentsply Maillefer, n = 10). All the artificial canals were prepared to obtain a standardized lumen by using ProTaper Universal F1. Screw-in forces were measured using a custom-made experimental device (AEndoS-k, DMJ system) during instrumentation with each NiTi file system using the designated movement. The rotation speed was set at 350 rpm with an automatic 4 mm pecking motion at a speed of 1 mm/sec. The pecking depth was increased by 1 mm for each pecking motion until the file reach the working length. Forces were recorded during file movement, and the maximum force was extracted from the data. Maximum screw-in forces were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc comparison at a significance level of 95%.

Results

Reciproc and ProTaper Universal files generated the highest maximum screw-in forces among all the instruments while M-two and ProTaper Next showed the lowest (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Geometrical differences rather than shaping motion and alloys may affect the screw-in force during canal instrumentation. To reduce screw-in forces, the use of NiTi files with smaller cross-sectional area for higher flexibility is recommended.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of mechanical properties and shaping performance of ProGlider and ProTaper ultimate slider
    Jeyi Song, Ji-Hyun Jang, Seok Woo Chang, Shin Hye Chung, Soram Oh
    BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screw-in force, torque generation, and performance of glide-path files with three rotation kinetics
    Jee-Yeon Woo, Ji-Hyun Jang, Seok Woo Chang, Soram Oh
    Odontology.2024; 112(3): 761.     CrossRef
  • Comparative evaluation of stress distribution against the root canal wall at three different levels using novel NiTi rotary files – A finite element analysis
    Rimjhim Singh, Sandeep Dubey, Palak Singh, Praveen Singh Samant, Suparna Ganguly Saha
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2024; 27(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • Restoration of teeth lacking complete ferrules using cast precious metal alloy post-and-cores and knife-edged crowns: A retrospective clinical study
    Fangyue Xiang, Keying Shi, Haoyang Hua, Jing Zhao, Yuanna Zheng
    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Periodic Changes in Rotation Speed on Torsional Stress and Screw-in Force by Alternative Rotation Technique
    Jung-Hong Ha, Hyo-Jin Jo, Sang Won Kwak, Asgeir Sigurdsson, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
    Journal of Endodontics.2023; 49(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • A Comparative Evaluation of the Apically Extruded Debris from Root Canals Prepared by R-Motion NiTi File System
    Farah B. Al-Saffar, Hikmet A. Al-Gharrawi, Luca Testarelli
    International Journal of Dentistry.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Rotational Modes on Torque/Force Generation and Canal Centering Ability during Rotary Root Canal Instrumentation with Differently Heat-Treated Nickel–Titanium Instruments
    Satoshi Omori, Arata Ebihara, Keiko Hirano, Yuka Kasuga, Hayate Unno, Taro Nakatsukasa, Shunsuke Kimura, Keiichiro Maki, Takao Hanawa, Takashi Okiji
    Materials.2022; 15(19): 6850.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Core Mass and Alloy on Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Different Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments in Matching Artificial Canals
    Sebastian Bürklein, Lennart Zupanc, David Donnermeyer, Karsten Tegtmeyer, Edgar Schäfer
    Materials.2021; 14(19): 5734.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Torque, Screw-in Force, and Shaping Ability of Glide Path Instruments in Continuous Rotation and Optimum Glide Path Motion
    Pyae Hein Htun, Arata Ebihara, Keiichiro Maki, Shunsuke Kimura, Miki Nishijo, Moe Sandar Kyaw, Takashi Okiji
    Journal of Endodontics.2021; 47(1): 94.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Torque and Force Induced by Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments during Root Canal Preparation: A Systematic Review
    Myint Thu, Arata Ebihara, Sherif Adel, Takashi Okiji
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(7): 3079.     CrossRef
  • Influence of rotational speed on torque/force generation and shaping ability during root canal instrumentation of extracted teeth with continuous rotation and optimum torque reverse motion
    M. S. Kyaw, A. Ebihara, Y. Kasuga, K. Maki, S. Kimura, P. H. Htun, T. Nakatsukasa, T. Okiji
    International Endodontic Journal.2021; 54(9): 1614.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Optimum Torque Reverse Motion on Torque and Force Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Crown-down and Single-length Techniques
    Shunsuke Kimura, Arata Ebihara, Keiichiro Maki, Miki Nishijo, Daisuke Tokita, Takashi Okiji
    Journal of Endodontics.2020; 46(2): 232.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of torque and apical force to assess the cutting behaviour of ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal endodontic instruments
    Gustavo de Cristofaro Almeida, Diego Pinheiro Aun, Pedro Damas Resende, Isabella Faria da Cunha Peixoto, Ana Cecília Diniz Viana, Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono, Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2020; 46(1): 52.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced root canal-centering ability and reduced screw-in force generation of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with a post-machining thermal treatment
    Keiichiro MAKI, Arata EBIHARA, Shunsuke KIMURA, Miki NISHIJO, Daisuke TOKITA, Kana MIYARA, Takashi OKIJI
    Dental Materials Journal.2020; 39(2): 251.     CrossRef
  • Ex-Vivo Comparison of Torsional Stress on Nickel–Titanium Instruments Activated by Continuous Rotation or Adaptive Motion
    Joo Yeong Lee, Sang Won Kwak, Jung-Hong Ha, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
    Materials.2020; 13(8): 1900.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of stress distribution in nickel-titanium rotary instruments with different geometrical designs subjected to bending and torsional load: a finite element study
    Manar Galal, Tamer M. Hamdy
    Bulletin of the National Research Centre.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of mechanical properties of WaveOne Gold Primary reciprocating instruments
    Tong FANGLI, Keiichiro MAKI, Shunsuke KIMURA, Miki NISHIJO, Daisuke TOKITA, Arata EBIHARA, Takashi OKIJI
    Dental Materials Journal.2019; 38(3): 490.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Screw-In Forces during Movement of Endodontic Files with Different Geometries, Alloys, and Kinetics
    Sang Won Kwak, Chan-Joo Lee, Sung Kyo Kim, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Jung-Hong Ha
    Materials.2019; 12(9): 1506.     CrossRef
  • Gripping the Gripped: Removal of Foreign Bodies from Root Canal System
    Shweta Jain, Sachin Jain, Shikha Jain, Sophia Thakur
    Dental Research and Management.2019; : 13.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Properties of Orifice Preflaring Nickel-titanium Rotary Instrument Heat Treated Using T-Wire Technology
    Maamoun Ataya, Jung-Hong Ha, Sang Won Kwak, Ibrahim H. Abu-Tahun, Rashid El Abed, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
    Journal of Endodontics.2018; 44(12): 1867.     CrossRef
  • How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures?
    Carlos José Soares, Monise de Paula Rodrigues, André Luis Faria-e-Silva, Paulo Cesar Freitas Santos-Filho, Crisnicaw Veríssimo, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Antheunis Versluis
    Brazilian Oral Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of NiTi rotary glide path files manufactured from controlled memory wires
    Miki NISHIJO, Arata EBIHARA, Daisuke TOKITA, Hisashi DOI, Takao HANAWA, Takashi OKIJI
    Dental Materials Journal.2018; 37(4): 549.     CrossRef
  • Nickel–titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art
    Giulio Gavini, Marcelo dos Santos, Celso Luis Caldeira, Manoel Eduardo de Lima Machado, Laila Gonzales Freire, Elaine Faga Iglecias, Ove Andrea Peters, George Táccio de Miranda Candeiro
    Brazilian Oral Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dynamic Torque and Vertical Force Analysis during Nickel-titanium Rotary Root Canal Preparation with Different Modes of Reciprocal Rotation
    Daisuke Tokita, Arata Ebihara, Miki Nishijo, Kana Miyara, Takashi Okiji
    Journal of Endodontics.2017; 43(10): 1706.     CrossRef
  • 213 View
  • 4 Download
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
Preference of undergraduate students after first experience on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments
Sang Won Kwak, Gary Shun-Pan Cheung, Jung-Hong Ha, Sung Kyo Kim, Hyojin Lee, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(3):176-181.   Published online June 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.176
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to compare two nickel-titanium systems (rotary vs. reciprocating) for their acceptance by undergraduate students who experienced nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments for the first time.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-one sophomore dental students were first taught on manual root canal preparation with stainless-steel files. After that, they were instructed on the use of ProTaper Universal system (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer), then the WaveOne (WO, Dentsply Maillefer). They practiced with each system on 2 extracted molars, before using those files to shape the buccal or mesial canals of additional first molars. A questionnaire was completed after using each file system, seeking students' perception about 'Ease of use', 'Flexibility', 'Cutting-efficiency', 'Screwing-effect', 'Feeling-safety', and 'Instrumentation-time' of the NiTi files, relative to stainless-steel instrumentation, on a 5-point Likert-type scale. They were also requested to indicate their preference between the two systems. Data was compared between groups using t-test, and with Chi-square test for correlation of each perception value with the preferred choice (p = 0.05).

Results

Among the 81 students, 55 indicated their preferred file system as WO and 22 as PTU. All scores were greater than 4 (better) for both systems, compared with stainless-steel files, except for 'Screwing-effect' for PTU. The scores for WO in the categories of 'Flexibility', 'Screwing-effect', and 'Feeling-safety' were significantly higher scores than those of PTU. A significant association between the 'Screwing-effect' and students' preference for WO was observed.

Conclusions

Novice operators preferred nickel-titanium instruments to stainless-steel, and majority of them opted for reciprocating file instead of continuous rotating system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endodontic Procedural Errors and Associated Factors among Undergraduate Dental Students: A Cross-sectional Study
    Vivek Padmanabhan, Md Sofiqul Islam, Mohamed A Elsayed, Duaa R Saleh, Amal M Alnahdi
    The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2024; 24(12): 998.     CrossRef
  • Clinicians’ perspectives, inducements, preferences, and clinical experiences regarding the use of electronic apex locator and apex locator integrated engine-driven instrumentation: a cross-sectional study
    Sena Kaşıkçı, Sena Kolunsağ Özbek, Ebru Şirinoğlu, Olcay Özdemir
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation and Comparison of Manual and Mechanical Endodontic Instrumentation Completed by Undergraduate Dental Students on Endodontic Blocks
    António Ginjeira, Abayomi O. Baruwa, Karla Baumotte
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(11): 363.     CrossRef
  • The first experiences of preclinical dentistry students with rotary instruments: A pilot study
    Işıl Kaya Büyükbayram, Gizem Çolakoğlu, Sana Mahroos Al-Shammari, Katia Stoicefidis
    Saudi Endodontic Journal.2024; 14(2): 205.     CrossRef
  • First Experience of an Undergraduate Dental Student with a Reciprocating System in Simulated Root Canals—A Pilot Study
    Ana Rita Arede, Inês Ferreira, Ana Cristina Braga, Irene Pina-Vaz
    Applied Sciences.2023; 13(8): 4848.     CrossRef
  • Effect on undergraduate student self-confidence in using 3D printed primary molars for root canal treatment simulation training
    C. Delfosse, T. Marquillier, S. Ndoye, P.-Y. Cousson, M. Hennequin, C. Catteau
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2023; 24(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • Influence of operator expertise on glide path and root canal preparation of curved root canals with rotary and reciprocating motions
    Ana Belén Dablanca‐Blanco, Ana Arias, María José Ginzo‐Villamayor, María Consuelo Pérez, Pablo Castelo‐Baz, Benjamín Martín‐Biedma
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2022; 48(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using nickel‐titanium reciprocating versus hand instruments
    Seniha Miçooğulları Kurt, Gözde Kandemir Demirci, Burcu Serefoglu, Mehmet Emin Kaval, Pelin Güneri, Mehmet Kemal Çalışkan
    Journal of Dental Education.2022; 86(12): 1662.     CrossRef
  • Radiographic assessment of endodontic mishaps in an undergraduate student clinic: a 2-year retrospective study
    Manal Matoug-Elwerfelli, Ahmed Abdou, Wejdan Almutairi, Malak Alhuthayli, Shaikhah Aloyaynaa, Rahaf Almohareb
    PeerJ.2022; 10: e13858.     CrossRef
  • Ex vivo shaping ability of reciprocating instruments operated by new users: Reciproc versus WaveOne
    Mary S. H. Lam, Jeffrey W. W. Chang, Gary S. P. Cheung
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2021; 25(5): 2791.     CrossRef
  • Body temperature fatigue behaviour of reciprocating and rotary glide path instruments in sodium hypochlorite solutions alone or combined with etidronate
    Dario Perez‐Villalba, José C. Macorra, Juan J. Perez‐Higueras, Ove A. Peters, Ana Arias
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2021; 47(3): 450.     CrossRef
  • Undergraduate Students’ Acceptance of a Reciprocating One-File System for Endodontic Treatment
    Benjamin Mahmoodi, Adriano Azaripour, Kawe Sagheb, Keyvan Sagheb, Brita Willershausen, Jens Weusmann
    European Journal of Dentistry.2020; 14(03): 393.     CrossRef
  • Fracture of endodontic instruments - Part 1: Literature review on factors that influence instrument breakage
    Maheshan Pillay, Martin Vorster, Peet J Van der Vyver
    South African Dental Journal.2020; 75(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
    Gül Çelik, Feyza Özdemir Kısacık, Emir Faruk Yılmaz, Arife Mersinlioğlu, İhsan Furkan Ertuğrul, Hikmet Orhan
    PeerJ.2019; 7: e7419.     CrossRef
  • Undergraduate dentistry students’ perception of difficulties regarding endodontic treatment
    Lorrane G. Tavares, Stella M. F. Lima, Miriane G. Lima, Marcos P. Arruda, Thiago C. Menegazzi, Taia M. B. Rezende
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2019; 45(1): 98.     CrossRef
  • First Experience of Rotary Nickel Titanium Root Canal Instrumentation Performed by Undergraduate Students and General Dentists
    marwa sharaan, Noreen Kamel, Dimitrios Tziafas
    Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care.2017; 3(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • 203 View
  • 2 Download
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP