Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Sandra Helena Penha de Oliveira 1 Article
Biological assessment of a new ready-to-use hydraulic sealer
Francine Benetti, João Eduardo Gomes-Filho, India Olinta de Azevedo-Queiroz, Marina Carminatti, Letícia Citelli Conti, Alexandre Henrique dos Reis-Prado, Sandra Helena Penha de Oliveira, Edilson Ervolino, Elói Dezan-Júnior, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(2):e21.   Published online March 24, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e21
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study compared the cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and tenascin immunolabeling of a new ready-to-use hydraulic sealer (Bio-C Sealer) with MTA-Fillapex and white MTA-Angelus.

Materials and Methods

L929 fibroblasts were cultivated and exposed to undiluted and diluted material extracts. Polyethylene tubes with or without (the control) the materials were implanted into the dorsa of rats. At 7 days and 30 days, the rats were euthanized, and the specimens were prepared for analysis; inflammation and immunolabeling were measured, and statistical analysis was performed (p < 0.05).

Results

MTA-Fillapex exhibited greater cytotoxicity than the other materials at all time points (p < 0.05). The undiluted Bio-C Sealer exhibited greater cytocompatibility at 6 and 48 hours than white MTA-Angelus, with higher cell viability than in the control (p < 0.05). White MTA-Angelus displayed higher cell viability than the control at 24 hours, and the one-half dilution displayed similar results at both 6 and 48 hours (p < 0.05). At 7 days and 30 days, the groups exhibited moderate inflammation with thick fibrous capsules and mild inflammation with thin fibrous capsules, respectively (p > 0.05). At 7 days, moderate to strong immunolabeling was observed (p > 0.05). After 30 days, the control and MTA-Fillapex groups exhibited strong immunolabeling, the white MTA-Angelus group exhibited moderate immunolabeling (p > 0.05), and the Bio-C Sealer group exhibited low-to-moderate immunolabeling, differing significantly from the control (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Bio-C Sealer and white MTA-Angelus exhibited greater cytocompatibility than MTA-Fillapex; all materials displayed adequate biocompatibility and induced tenascin immunolabeling.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of photoactivation on tissue response to different dyes used in photodynamic therapy and laser ablation therapy
    Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra, Cristiane Cantiga-Silva, Henrique Augusto Banci, Flávio Duarte Faria, Nathália Evelyn da Silva Machado, Carolina de Barros Morais Cardoso, Pedro Henrique Chaves de Oliveira, Lucas Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela, Gustavo Sivieri
    Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology.2024; 251: 112843.     CrossRef
  • Bleaching effectiveness and cytotoxicity of new experimental formulation of niobium-based bleaching gel
    Camila de Sousa Caneschi, Francine Benetti, Luiz Carlos Alves de Oliveira, Jadson Cláudio Belchior, Raquel Conceição Ferreira, Allyson Nogueira Moreira, Luís Fernando dos Santos Alves Morgan
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2023; 27(4): 1613.     CrossRef
  • Biological investigation of resinous endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide
    Carlos Roberto Emerenciano Bueno, Francine Benetti, Marina Tolomei Sandoval Cury, Ana Maria Veiga Vasques, Leopoldo Cosme-Silva, Índia Olinta de Azevedo Queiroz, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues da Silva, Rogério de Castilho Jacinto, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra, E
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(7): e0287890.     CrossRef
  • Tricalcium silicate cement sealers
    Anita Aminoshariae, Carolyn Primus, James C. Kulild
    The Journal of the American Dental Association.2022; 153(8): 750.     CrossRef
  • Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
    Chandrasekhar Veeramachaneni, Swathi Aravelli, Sreeja Dundigalla
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2022; 25(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • 315 View
  • 7 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP