Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Muhittin Ugurlu 2 Articles
A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations
Muhittin Ugurlu, Fatmanur Sari
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(1):e5.   Published online December 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e5
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to assess the clinical longevity of a bulk-fill resin composite in Class II restorations for 3-year.

Materials and Methods

Patient record files acquired from the 40 patients who were treated due to needed 2 similar sizes Class II composite restorations were used for this retrospective study. In the experimental cavity, the flowable resin composite SDR was inserted in the dentinal part as a 4 mm intermediate layer. A 2 mm coverage layer with a nano-hybrid resin composite (CeramX) was placed on SDR. The control restoration was performed by an incremental technique of 2 mm using the nano-hybrid resin composite. The restorations were blindly assessed by 2 calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 years. The data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (p = 0.05).

Results

Eighty Class II restorations were evaluated. After 3-years, 4 restorations (5%) failed, 1 SDR + CeramX, and 3 CeramX restorations. The annual failure rate (AFR) of the restorations was 1.7%. The SDR + CeramX group revealed an AFR of 0.8%, and the CeramX group an AFR of 2.5% (p > 0.05). Regarding anatomical form and marginal adaptation, significant alterations were observed in the CeramX group after 3-years (p < 0.05). The changes in the color match were observed in each group over time (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The use of SDR demonstrated good clinical durability in deep Class II resin composite restorations.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of New Generation Bulk-Fill Composites
    Zehra SÜSGÜN YILDIRIM, Ezgi SONKAYA, Zeliha Gonca BEK KÜRKLÜ
    Cumhuriyet Dental Journal.2023; 26(2): 180.     CrossRef
  • Damping Behaviour and Mechanical Properties of Restorative Materials for Primary Teeth
    Thomas Niem, Roland Frankenberger, Stefanie Amend, Bernd Wöstmann, Norbert Krämer
    Materials.2022; 15(21): 7698.     CrossRef
  • 197 View
  • 8 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Bonding of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin using universal adhesives
Muhittin Ugurlu
Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(3):e36.   Published online June 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e36
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aims to assess the effect of universal adhesives pretreatment on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin.

Materials and Methods

Fifty caries-free human third molars were employed. The teeth were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 10) based on dentin surface pretreatments: Single Bond Universal (3M Oral Care), Gluma Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer), Prime&Bond Elect (Dentsply), Cavity Conditioner (GC) and control (no surface treatment). After Fuji II LC (GC) was bonded to the dentin surfaces, the specimens were stored for 7 days at 37°C. The specimens were segmented into microspecimens, and the microspecimens were subjugated to microtensile bond strength testing (1.0 mm/min). The modes of failure analyzed using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan tests (p = 0.05).

Results

The surface pretreatments with the universal adhesives and conditioner increased the bond strength of Fuji II LC to dentin (p < 0.05). Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal provided higher bond strength to Fuji II LC than Cavity Conditioner (p < 0.05). The bond strengths obtained from Prime&Bond Elect and Cavity Conditioner were not statistically different (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The universal adhesives and polyacrylic acid conditioner could increase the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin. The use of universal adhesives before the application of RMGIC may be more beneficial in improving bond strength.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial
    Reham Hendam, Rania Mosallam, Dina Kamal
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2025; 28(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Push-Out Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements Following Post Space Irrigation with 2% Chitosan: An In Vitro Study
    Shimaa Rifaat, Ahmed Rahoma, Hind Muneer Alharbi, Sawsan Jamal Kazim, Shrouq Ali Aljuaid, Basmah Omar Alakloby, Faraz A. Farooqi, Noha Taymour
    Prosthesis.2025; 7(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Nanosilver Fluoride Application on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Carious Dentin: An In Vitro Study
    Ila Srinivasan, Yuthi Milit, Anushka Das, Neeraja Ramamurthy
    International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2024; 17(5): 565.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Surface Treatments on Shear-bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cements to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Simulated Carious Dentin
    WT Koh, OT Yeoh, NA Yahya, AU Yap
    Operative Dentistry.2024; 49(6): 714.     CrossRef
  • Desensitizing agents’ post-bleaching effect on orthodontic bracket bond strength
    Gufa Bagus Pamungkas, Dyah Karunia, Sri Suparwitri
    Dental Journal.2024; 57(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Successful Rehabilitation of Traumatized Immature Teeth by Different Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Patients
    Mohammad Kamran Khan
    Journal of the Scientific Society.2023; 50(1): 111.     CrossRef
  • Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Juliana Benace Fernandes, Sheila Mondragón Contreras, Manuela da Silva Spinola, Graziela Ribeiro Batista, Eduardo Bresciani, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of tooth preparation on the microleakage of fissure sealant
    Gesti Kartiko Sari, Sri Kuswandari, Putri Kusuma Wardani Mahendra
    Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).2022; 55(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Rheological Properties, Surface Microhardness, and Dentin Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Methacrylate-Functionalized Polyacids and Spherical Pre-Reacted Glass Fillers
    Whithipa Thepveera, Wisitsin Potiprapanpong, Arnit Toneluck, Somruethai Channasanon, Chutikarn Khamsuk, Naruporn Monmaturapoj, Siriporn Tanodekaew, Piyaphong Panpisut
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2021; 12(3): 42.     CrossRef
  • 458 View
  • 9 Download
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP