-
Retentive strength of different intracanal posts in restorations of anterior primary teeth: an in vitro study
-
Mahtab Memarpour, Fereshteh Shafiei, Maryam Abbaszadeh
-
Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(4):215-221. Published online November 12, 2013
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.4.215
-
-
Abstract
PDF PubReader ePub
- Objectives
To determine the retentive strength and failure mode of undercut composite post, glass fiber post and polyethylene fiber post luted with flowable composite resin and resin-cement. Materials and MethodsCoronal parts of 120 primary canine teeth were sectioned and specimens were treated endodontically. The teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 20). Prepared root canals received intracanal retainers with a short composite post, undercut composite post, glass fiber post luted with flowable resin or resin-cement, and polyethylene fiber post luted with flowable resin or resin-cement. After crown reconstruction, samples were tested for retentive strength and failure mode. Statistical analysis was done with one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). ResultsThere were statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.001). Mean bond strength in the undercut group was significantly greater than in the short composite post (p = 0.030), and the glass fiber post (p = 0.001) and the polyethylene fiber post group luted with resin-cement (p = 0.008). However, the differences between the undercut group and the groups with flowable composite as the luting agent were not significant (p = 0.068, p = 0.557). Adhesive failure was more frequent in the fiber post groups. ConclusionsAlthough the composite post with undercutting showed the greatest resistance to dislodgement, fiber posts cemented with flowable composite resin provided acceptable results in terms of retentive strength and fracture mode.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Mechanical Properties and Clinical Success of Intracanal Posts in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Selvakumar Haridoss, MS Muthu, Kavitha Swaminathan, Yamuna Shanmugam, Aksshaya Raghu, Krishnapillai Chandrababu Vignesh, Sunil Babu Kotha International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2024; 16(S3): S293. CrossRef - Comparison of shear bond strength of different types of intracanal posts in restoring extensively damaged primary anterior teeth
Shabnam Asghari Mollabashi, Shima Nourmohamadi, Afrooz Nakhostin Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects.2024; 18(2): 95. CrossRef - Effects of glass fibers reinforced and non-reinforced composite resin on fracture behavior of severely destructed primary incisors and restored with post and core system
Rizk El Agamy The Saudi Dental Journal.2024; 36(3): 451. CrossRef - Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
Ali Nozari, Boshra Rasoolzade, Zahra Jowkar, Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi, Mohammad Jowkar, Murilo Baena Lopes International Journal of Dentistry.2023; 2023: 1. CrossRef - Comparison of the Pull-Out Resistance of Grossly Decayed Primary Anterior Teeth Restored With Two Different Intracanal Posts: An In Vitro Study
Ayham Hijaz, Mohamed K Altinawi, Imad Katbeh, Eyad Gergos, Gharawi Alhamzah Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Comparison of fracture resistance of primary incisor teeth restored with glass fiber post and reversed-oriented metal post – an in vitro study
Hamideh Barghi, Samira Sharifi Dental Research Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Clinical and radiographic comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of restoring destroyed primary incisors using two different techniques—A pilot study
Seba Ibrahim, Abdul Wahab Nourallah Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2020; 6(5): 537. CrossRef - Coronal Microleakage of Teeth Restored with Cast Posts and Cores Cemented with Four Different Luting Agents after Thermocycling
Maryam Mohajerfar, Kaveh Nadizadeh, Tabasom Hooshmand, Elaheh Beyabanaki, Hamid Neshandar Asli, Siamak Sabour Journal of Prosthodontics.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Evaluation of the effect of different post materials and adhesive systems on the bonding strength of short‐post technique for primary teeth
Nihal Beldüz Kara, Tunahan Kanyilmaz, Soner Çankaya, Cankat Kara International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry.2018; 28(2): 239. CrossRef - Effect of ultrasonic tip designs on intraradicular post removal
Anny Carine Barros Aguiar, Daniely Amorim de Meireles, André Augusto Franco Marques, Emílio Carlos Sponchiado Júnior, Angela Delfina Bitencourt Garrido, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2014; 39(4): 265. CrossRef
-
189
View
-
2
Download
-
10
Crossref
|