Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Juliana Nunes Rolla

1 Article

Spectrophotometric evaluation of restorative composite shades and their match with a classical shade guide: Rafael Melara, Luciana Mendonça, Fábio Herrmann Coelho-de-Souza, Juliana Nunes Rolla, Luciano de Souza Gonçalves; Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(4):e60. Published online November 12, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e60

Objectives

The aim of this study was to verify the match between 5 shades of composites from different manufacturers with a shade guide and among the systems using a portable spectrophotometer.

Materials and Methods

Shade measurements were performed on specimens of Z350 XT (3M ESPE), Charisma Diamond (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH), Esthet X-HD (Dentsply Caulk), and Empress Direct (Ivoclar-Vivadent) for shades A1, A2, A3, B1, and C3 using a Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik) against a white background. Corresponding shades of Vitapan Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik) guide were measured likewise and shade variation (ΔE) was calculated based on International Commission on Illumination L*a*b* parameters. The ΔE of the composites in each shade was compared by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results

All composites presented ΔE > 3.7 compared with the shade guide. Variation in shades A3, B1, and C3 was significantly different for all composites. ΔE of Z350 XT was significantly lower for A1 than for the other shades, whereas ΔE of Z350 XT and Charisma Diamond were significantly lower for A2 than for the other shades.

Conclusions

No composite shade matched with the shade guide. Equivalent shades of the restorative composite from different manufacturers may show clinically noticeable ΔE.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Evaluation of the roughness, color match, and color stability of two monochromatic composite resins: a randomized controlled laboratory study
Iara Campos Santana, Sabrina Sobral de Oliveira, Karolina Pena Botelho, Renan Leonardi de Oliveira Rigotti, José Cristiano Ramos Glória, Adriana Maria Botelho, Dhelfeson Willya Douglas-de-Oliveira, Karine Taís Aguiar Tavano
BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Instrumental and Visual Evaluation of the Chameleon Effect of Single-shaded Composite Resins
RM Adiguzel, LK Kose, N Arhun
Operative Dentistry.2024; 49(4): 432. CrossRef
Color Stability of Bioactive Restorative Material vs Nanohybrid Resin Composite: An In Vitro Study
Esraa H Saber, Mohsen H Abielhassan, Yasser A Abed, Shereen E Fahim
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2024; 25(3): 221. CrossRef
A system for reliable composite shade matching: Custom shade tabs and an intra‐oral mockup
Adamo Notarantonio, Amanda Seay
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2023; 35(5): 787. CrossRef
Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of a recently introduced single‑shade composite resin versus multishade composite resins
Jiakang Zhu, Yue Xu, Mengxun Li, Cui Huang
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Color Stability of Bioactive Restorative Materials After Immersion in Various Media
Shara I Sajini, Ali B Mushayt, Talal A Almutairi, Roaa Abuljadayel
Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry.2022; 12(4): 418. CrossRef

204 View
10 Download
4 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Author index