Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Gary Shun-Pan Cheung 1 Article
Preference of undergraduate students after first experience on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments
Sang Won Kwak, Gary Shun-Pan Cheung, Jung-Hong Ha, Sung Kyo Kim, Hyojin Lee, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(3):176-181.   Published online June 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.176
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to compare two nickel-titanium systems (rotary vs. reciprocating) for their acceptance by undergraduate students who experienced nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments for the first time.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-one sophomore dental students were first taught on manual root canal preparation with stainless-steel files. After that, they were instructed on the use of ProTaper Universal system (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer), then the WaveOne (WO, Dentsply Maillefer). They practiced with each system on 2 extracted molars, before using those files to shape the buccal or mesial canals of additional first molars. A questionnaire was completed after using each file system, seeking students' perception about 'Ease of use', 'Flexibility', 'Cutting-efficiency', 'Screwing-effect', 'Feeling-safety', and 'Instrumentation-time' of the NiTi files, relative to stainless-steel instrumentation, on a 5-point Likert-type scale. They were also requested to indicate their preference between the two systems. Data was compared between groups using t-test, and with Chi-square test for correlation of each perception value with the preferred choice (p = 0.05).

Results

Among the 81 students, 55 indicated their preferred file system as WO and 22 as PTU. All scores were greater than 4 (better) for both systems, compared with stainless-steel files, except for 'Screwing-effect' for PTU. The scores for WO in the categories of 'Flexibility', 'Screwing-effect', and 'Feeling-safety' were significantly higher scores than those of PTU. A significant association between the 'Screwing-effect' and students' preference for WO was observed.

Conclusions

Novice operators preferred nickel-titanium instruments to stainless-steel, and majority of them opted for reciprocating file instead of continuous rotating system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endodontic Procedural Errors and Associated Factors among Undergraduate Dental Students: A Cross-sectional Study
    Vivek Padmanabhan, Md Sofiqul Islam, Mohamed A Elsayed, Duaa R Saleh, Amal M Alnahdi
    The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2024; 24(12): 998.     CrossRef
  • Clinicians’ perspectives, inducements, preferences, and clinical experiences regarding the use of electronic apex locator and apex locator integrated engine-driven instrumentation: a cross-sectional study
    Sena Kaşıkçı, Sena Kolunsağ Özbek, Ebru Şirinoğlu, Olcay Özdemir
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation and Comparison of Manual and Mechanical Endodontic Instrumentation Completed by Undergraduate Dental Students on Endodontic Blocks
    António Ginjeira, Abayomi O. Baruwa, Karla Baumotte
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(11): 363.     CrossRef
  • The first experiences of preclinical dentistry students with rotary instruments: A pilot study
    Işıl Kaya Büyükbayram, Gizem Çolakoğlu, Sana Mahroos Al-Shammari, Katia Stoicefidis
    Saudi Endodontic Journal.2024; 14(2): 205.     CrossRef
  • First Experience of an Undergraduate Dental Student with a Reciprocating System in Simulated Root Canals—A Pilot Study
    Ana Rita Arede, Inês Ferreira, Ana Cristina Braga, Irene Pina-Vaz
    Applied Sciences.2023; 13(8): 4848.     CrossRef
  • Effect on undergraduate student self-confidence in using 3D printed primary molars for root canal treatment simulation training
    C. Delfosse, T. Marquillier, S. Ndoye, P.-Y. Cousson, M. Hennequin, C. Catteau
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2023; 24(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • Influence of operator expertise on glide path and root canal preparation of curved root canals with rotary and reciprocating motions
    Ana Belén Dablanca‐Blanco, Ana Arias, María José Ginzo‐Villamayor, María Consuelo Pérez, Pablo Castelo‐Baz, Benjamín Martín‐Biedma
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2022; 48(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using nickel‐titanium reciprocating versus hand instruments
    Seniha Miçooğulları Kurt, Gözde Kandemir Demirci, Burcu Serefoglu, Mehmet Emin Kaval, Pelin Güneri, Mehmet Kemal Çalışkan
    Journal of Dental Education.2022; 86(12): 1662.     CrossRef
  • Radiographic assessment of endodontic mishaps in an undergraduate student clinic: a 2-year retrospective study
    Manal Matoug-Elwerfelli, Ahmed Abdou, Wejdan Almutairi, Malak Alhuthayli, Shaikhah Aloyaynaa, Rahaf Almohareb
    PeerJ.2022; 10: e13858.     CrossRef
  • Ex vivo shaping ability of reciprocating instruments operated by new users: Reciproc versus WaveOne
    Mary S. H. Lam, Jeffrey W. W. Chang, Gary S. P. Cheung
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2021; 25(5): 2791.     CrossRef
  • Body temperature fatigue behaviour of reciprocating and rotary glide path instruments in sodium hypochlorite solutions alone or combined with etidronate
    Dario Perez‐Villalba, José C. Macorra, Juan J. Perez‐Higueras, Ove A. Peters, Ana Arias
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2021; 47(3): 450.     CrossRef
  • Undergraduate Students’ Acceptance of a Reciprocating One-File System for Endodontic Treatment
    Benjamin Mahmoodi, Adriano Azaripour, Kawe Sagheb, Keyvan Sagheb, Brita Willershausen, Jens Weusmann
    European Journal of Dentistry.2020; 14(03): 393.     CrossRef
  • Fracture of endodontic instruments - Part 1: Literature review on factors that influence instrument breakage
    Maheshan Pillay, Martin Vorster, Peet J Van der Vyver
    South African Dental Journal.2020; 75(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
    Gül Çelik, Feyza Özdemir Kısacık, Emir Faruk Yılmaz, Arife Mersinlioğlu, İhsan Furkan Ertuğrul, Hikmet Orhan
    PeerJ.2019; 7: e7419.     CrossRef
  • Undergraduate dentistry students’ perception of difficulties regarding endodontic treatment
    Lorrane G. Tavares, Stella M. F. Lima, Miriane G. Lima, Marcos P. Arruda, Thiago C. Menegazzi, Taia M. B. Rezende
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2019; 45(1): 98.     CrossRef
  • First Experience of Rotary Nickel Titanium Root Canal Instrumentation Performed by Undergraduate Students and General Dentists
    marwa sharaan, Noreen Kamel, Dimitrios Tziafas
    Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care.2017; 3(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • 203 View
  • 2 Download
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP