-
Comparison of viability of oral epithelial cells stored by different freezing methods
-
Do-Young Baek, Seung-Jong Lee, Han-Sung Jung, EuiSeong Kim
-
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2009;34(6):491-499. Published online November 30, 2009
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.491
-
-
Abstract
PDF PubReader ePub
This study examined the influence of the storage methods on the viability of oral epithelial cells using conventional cell freezing storage, slow freezing preservation, rapid freezing preservation, and slow freezing preservation with a pressure of 2 Mpa or 3 Mpa. The cell viability was evaluated by cell counting, WST-1 and the clonogenic capacity after 6 days of freezing storage. After 6 days, the frozen cells were thawed rapidly, and the cell counting, WST-1, and clonogenic capacity values were measured and compared.
The results from cell counting demonstrated that conventional cryopreservation, slow freezing under a 2 Mpa pressure and slow freezing under a 3 Mpa pressure showed significantly higher values than slow freezing preservation and rapid freezing preservation (p<0.05).
The results from the optical density by WST-1 demonstrated that slow freezing under a 2 Mpa pressure showed significantly higher values than slow freezing preservation and rapid freezing preservation (p<0.05).
The clonogenic capacity demonstrated that slow freezing under a 2 Mpa pressure showed significantly higher values than slow freezing preservation and rapid freezing preservation (p<0.05).
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Evaluation of the Viability of Rat Periodontal Ligament Cells after Storing at 0℃/2 MPa Condition up to One Week: In Vivo MTT Method
Sun Mi Jang, Sin-Yeon Cho, Eui-Seong Kim, Il-Young Jung, Seung Jong Lee Journal of Korean Dental Science.2016; 9(1): 1. CrossRef - The evaluation of periodontal ligament cells of rat teeth after low-temperature preservation under high pressure
Jin-Ho Chung, Jin Kim, Seong-Ho Choi, Eui-Seong Kim, Jiyong Park, Seung-Jong Lee Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(4): 285. CrossRef
-
155
View
-
1
Download
-
2
Crossref
|