Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Byung-Do Lee 1 Article
Evaluation of the radiopacity and cytotoxicity of resinous root canal sealers
Chang-Kyu Kim, Hyun-Wook Ryu, Hoon-Sang Chang, Byung-Do Lee, Kyung-San Min, Chan-Ui Hong
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007;32(5):419-425.   Published online September 30, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.5.419
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity and cytotoxicity of three resin-based (AH 26, EZ fill and AD Seal), a zinc oxide-eugenol-based (ZOB Seal), and a calcium hydroxide-based (Sealapex) root canal sealers. Specimens, 10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness, were radiographed simultaneously with an aluminum step wedge using occlusal films, according to ISO 6876/2001 standards. Radiographs were digitized, and the radiopacity of sealers was compared to the different thicknesses of the aluminum step wedge, using the Scion image software. Using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, the cytotoxicity of each material was determined in immortalized human periodontal ligament (IPDL) cells.

The results demonstrated that EZ fill was the most radiopaque sealer, while Sealapex was the least radiopaque (p < 0.05). AH 26, AD Seal and ZOB Seal presented intermediate radiopacity values. All the materials evaluated, except for Sealapex, presented the minimum radiopacity required by ISO standards. The cell viabilities of resin-based root canal sealers were statistically higher than that of other type of root canal sealers through the all experimental time. Further, EZ fill showed statistically lower cell viability in 24 and 48 hours compared to AD Seal and in 72 hours compared to all other resin-based root canal sealers. However, there was no correlation between the radiopacity and cytotoxicity of three resin-based root canals sealers (p > 0.05).

These results indicate that resin-based root canal sealer is more biocompatible and has advantage in terms of radiopacity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Comparative Evaluation of Two Commonly Used GP Solvents on Different Epoxy Resin-based Sealers: An In Vitro Study
    Sakshi Tyagi, Ekta Choudhary, Rajat Chauhan, Ashish Choudhary
    International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2020; 13(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of softening ability of Xylene & Endosolv-R on three different epoxy resin based sealers within 1 to 2 minutes - anin vitrostudy
    Pratima Ramakrishna Shenoi, Gautam Pyarelal Badole, Rajiv Tarachand Khode
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2014; 39(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: anin vitrostudy
    Gautam Pyarelal Badole, Manjusha Madhukar Warhadpande, Ganesh Kothiramji Meshram, Rakesh Namdeoraoji Bahadure, Shubha Gopal Tawani, Gopal Tawani, Shital Gautam Badole
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2013; 38(4): 204.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of radiopacity and discriminability of various fiber reinforced composite posts
    Eun-Hye Lee, Hang-Moon Choi, Se-Hee Park, Jin-Woo Kim, Kyung-Mo Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(3): 188.     CrossRef
  • A comparative study on radiopacity of root canal sealers
    Tae-Min Kim, Seo-Kyoung Kim, In-Nam Hwang, Yun-Chan Hwang, Byung-Cheol Kang, Suk-Ja Yoon, Jae-Seo Lee, Won-Mann Oh
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2009; 34(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • A comparative study on radiopacity of canal filling and retrograde root-end filling materials
    Yong-Sang Kim, Seo-Kyong Kim, Yun-Chan Hwang, In-Nam Hwang, Won-Mann Oh
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(2): 107.     CrossRef
  • 183 View
  • 2 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP