Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin

Jung Min Lee; Young Kyung Kim; Jeong-won Park

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 27(4); 2002 > Article

Original Article Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin: Jung Min Lee, Young Kyung Kim, Jeong-won Park; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2002;27(4):394-402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394
Published online: January 14, 2002

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

24 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

REFERENCES

Fig. 1.

Dye leakage test score. O=no leakage, 1; leakage within half of the gingival wall, 2; leakage within the gingival wall, 3; leakage pass the gingival wall to the axial

(D=dentin, CR=composite resin, ER=embedding resin)

Table 1.

Filling techniques investigated in this study

Group	Flowable composite lining and its thickness	Incremental insertion technique of overlying composite resin
1	Not used	horizontal
2	Not used	oblique
3	0.5 - 1 mm	horizontal
4	0.5 - 1 mm	oblique
5	2 - 3 mm	horizontal
6	2 - 3 mm	oblique

Table 2.

Frequency of dye penetration scores

Groups				Total
Groups	1	2	3	Total
1	3	8	9	20
2	10	7	3	20
3	8	2	10	20
4	7	3	10	20
5	5	4	11	20
6	6	2	12	20
Total	39	26	55	120

No significant difference between groups(p>0.05).

Table 3.

Frequency of dye penetration scores for oblique incremental fillings

Groups				Total
Groups	1	2	3	Total
2	10	7	3	20
4	7	3	10	20
6	6	2	12	20
Total	23	12	25	60

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

Table 4.

Frequency of dye penetration scores for horizontal incremental fillings

Groups				Total
Groups	1	2	3	Total
1	3	8	9	20
3	8	2	10	20
5	5	4	11	20
Total	16	14	30	60

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

REFERENCES

1. Hansen E K. Contraction pattern of composite resins in dentin cavities. Scand J. Dent. Res. 90:480-483. 1982.Article PubMed
2. De Gee A J, Davidson C L, Smith A A. Modified dilatometer of continuous recording of volumetric polymerization shrinkage of composite restorative materials. J Dent. 9:36-42. 1981.PubMed
3. Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet. Dent. 59:297-300. 1988.PubMed
4. Bra¨nnstro¨m M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 9:57-68. 1984.PubMed
5. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjo¨r I A. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol. Scand. 48:305-311. 1990.Article PubMed
6. Kim J H, Park J.-W, Park J.-H, Kim S K. Bond strength and microleakage in resin bonding to tooth structure. J Kor. Acad. Conserv. Dent. 24:570-577. 1999.
7. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg T R. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quint Int. 17:777-784. 1986.
8. Koenigsberg S, Fuks A, Grajower R. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quint Int. 20:117-121. 1989.
9. Dietschi D, Siebenthal G D, Nevei-Rosenstand L, Holz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quint Int. 26:717-727. 1995.
10. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quint Int. 18:125-131. 1987.
11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 7:107-113. 1991.Article PubMed
12. Neiva I F, De Andrada M A C, Baratieri L N, Monteiro S Jr., Ritter A V. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent. 23:282-289. 1998.PubMed
13. Rada E R. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts. Quint Int. 24:793-798. 1993.
14. Bertolotti R. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. J. Practical Periodontics and Aesthet Dent. 3:53-58. 1991.
15. Crim G A, Chapman K W. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quint Int. 25:781-785. 1994.
16. Swift E J, Triolo P T Jr., Barkmeier W W, Bird J L, Bounds S J. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. 9: 100-104. 1996.PMC
17. Leevailoj C, Cochran M A, Matis B A, Moore B K, Platt J A. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent. 26:302-307. 2001.PubMed
18. Moon J.-H, Ko K.-H. The effect of flowable resin lining on the marginal microleakage of condensable resin restoration. J. Kor. Acad. Conserv Dent. 26:16-22. 2001.
19. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J. Dent Res. 69:1240-1243. 1990.PubMed
20. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J. Prosthet Dent. 64:658-664. 1990.Article PubMed
21. Rooklidge E, Boyer D, Bouschlicher M. Cusp deformation by shrinkage of condensable composite. J Dent. Res. 78:Abstracts of Papers. p399; Abstract 2349. 1999.
22. Unterbrink G L, Liebenberg W H. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quint Int. 30:249-257. 1999.
23. Belli S, Inokoshi S, zer F, Pereira P N R, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent. 26:70-75. 2001.PubMed
24. Tung F F, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: An in vitro investigation. Quint Int. 31:430-434. 2000.
25. Chuang S F, Liu J K, Jin Y T. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent. 26:193-200. 2001.
26. Beznos C. Microleakage at the Cervical Margin of Composite Class II Cavities with Different Restorative Techniques. Oper Dent. 26:60-69. 2001.PubMed
27. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis J P, Roos J R, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent. Res. 72:1434-1442. 1993.Article PubMed PDF
28. Davidson C L, De Gee A J, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent. Res. 63:1396-1399. 1984.Article PubMed PDF
29. Jang B S, Kim S K. Bonding of resin inlay to glass-ionomer base with various treatments in inlay surface. J Kor. Acad. Conserv. Dent. 25:399-406. 2000.
30. Carvalho R M, Pereira J C, Yoshiyama M, Pashley D H. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 21:17-24. 1996.PubMed
31. Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J. Dent Res. 66:1636-1639. 1987.Article PubMed PDF
32. Kinomoto Y, Torii M. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stress in resin composite restoration. J Dent. 26:165-171. 1998.PubMed
33. Bayne S C, Thompson J Y, Swift E D Jr., Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J. Dent Ass. 129:567-577. 1998.Article PubMed
34. Leinfelder K F, Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 17:112-116. 1998.
35. The Dental Advisor : Packable composites. The Dental Advisor 16:1-4. 1999.
36. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 15:128-137. 1999.Article PubMed
37. Tolidis K, Setcos J C. Initial degree of polymerization shrinkage exhibited by flowable composite resins. J Dent. Res. 78:Abstracts of Papers p482 Abstract 3015. 1999.
38. Alomari Q D, Reinhardt J W, Boyer D B. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 26:406-411. 2001.PubMed
39. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Restoration quality in relation to wedge-mediated light channeling. Quint Int. 23:763-767. 1992.
40. Ciamponi A L, Del Portillo Lujan V A, Ferreira Santos J F. Effectiveness of reflective wedges on the polymerization of composite resins. Quint Int. 25:599-602. 1994.
41. Barnes D M, Holston A M, Strassler H E, Shires P J. Evaluation of clinical performance of twelve posterior composite resins with a standardized placement technique. J Esthet. Dent. 2:36-43. 1990.Article PubMed
42. Eick J D, Welch F H. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quint Int. 17:103-111. 1986.
43. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W H. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent. Res. 77:1435-1445. 1998.Article PubMed PDF
44. Ferracane J L. Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews of Oral Biology and Medicine 6:302-318. 1995.Article PubMed PDF
45. Pires J A F, Cvitko E, Denehy G E, Swift E J Jr. Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quint Int. 24:517-521. 1993.
46. Rueggeberg F A, Jordan D M. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J. Prosthet. 6:364-370. 1993.
47. Dang H M, Sarrett D C. Wear behavior of flowable and condensable composite resins. J Dent. Res. 78 Abstracts of Papers p447 Abstract 2736. 1999.
48. Ulusu T, Oztas N, Tulunoglu O. Comparison of the effect of insertion techniques of a resin composite on dentinal adaptation of two visible light-cured bases: Direct evaluation versus a replica technique. Quint Int. 27:63-68. 1996.

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27(4):394-402. Published online January 14, 2002

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394

XML Download

Figure

Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin

Fig. 1. Dye leakage test score. O=no leakage, 1; leakage within half of the gingival wall, 2; leakage within the gingival wall, 3; leakage pass the gingival wall to the axial

Fig. 1.

Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin

Group	Flowable composite lining and its thickness	Incremental insertion technique of overlying composite resin
1	Not used	horizontal
2	Not used	oblique
3	0.5 - 1 mm	horizontal
4	0.5 - 1 mm	oblique
5	2 - 3 mm	horizontal
6	2 - 3 mm	oblique

Groups				Total
Groups	1	2	3	Total
1	3	8	9	20
2	10	7	3	20
3	8	2	10	20
4	7	3	10	20
5	5	4	11	20
6	6	2	12	20
Total	39	26	55	120

Groups				Total
Groups	1	2	3	Total
2	10	7	3	20
4	7	3	10	20
6	6	2	12	20
Total	23	12	25	60

Groups				Total
Groups	1	2	3	Total
1	3	8	9	20
3	8	2	10	20
5	5	4	11	20
Total	16	14	30	60

Table 1. Filling techniques investigated in this study

Table 2. Frequency of dye penetration scores

No significant difference between groups(p>0.05).

Table 3. Frequency of dye penetration scores for oblique incremental fillings

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

Table 4. Frequency of dye penetration scores for horizontal incremental fillings