Influence of the curing time for the adhesive on the oxygen-inhibited layer thickness and the shear bond strength to dentin

Yong-Hoon Choi; Ji-Hyun Bae; Ho-Hyun Son; In-Bog Lee; Chung-Moon Um; Seung-Ho Baek; Oh-Young Kim; Chang-Keun Kim; Byeong-Hoon Cho

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.177

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 29(2); 2004 > Article

Original Article Influence of the curing time for the adhesive on the oxygen-inhibited layer thickness and the shear bond strength to dentin: Yong-Hoon Choi¹, Ji-Hyun Bae¹, Ho-Hyun Son¹, In-Bog Lee¹, Chung-Moon Um¹, Seung-Ho Baek¹, Oh-Young Kim², Chang-Keun Kim³, Byeong-Hoon Cho^1,; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2004;29(2):177-184.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.177
Published online: January 14, 2004

¹Department of Conservative Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University

²Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Dankook University

³Department of Chemical Engineering, Chung-ang University

Corresponding author: Byeong-Hoon Cho, Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University 28-2 Yeongun-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul, Korea 110-749, Tel : 82-2-760-3514, 2651, Fax : 82-2-764-3514, E-mail : chobh@plaza.snu.ac.kr

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

17 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Objectives:
This study investigated the hypothesis that increasing light-curing time would leave the oxygen-inhibited layer (OIL) of the adhesive thinner, and in turn, result in lower shear bond strength (SBS) than those obtained by the routine curing procedures.
Methods:
120 human extracted posterior teeth were randomly divided into three groups for bonding with three adhesives: All Bond 2®, One Step®, and Adper Prompt®. They were subsequently divided into four subgourps with different light-curing time (10, 20, 30 and 60 s). The assigned adhesives were applied on superficial occlusal dentin according to the manufacturer’s instructions and cured with one of the four curing times. Composite resin cylinder, 2.35 mm in diameter, were built on the cured adhesive and light-cured for 40 s. SBS were measured after 24 h from the bonding using a universal testing machine (crosshead speed 1.0 mm/min). The relative thickness of the OIL and the degree of conversion (DC) were determined from the adhesive on a slide glass using FT-NIR in an absorbance mode. Data were analysed with One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple test (p < 0.05).
Results:
With increasing cure time, although there were no significant difference in th SBS of One-step and Adper Prompt (p > 0.05), those of All Bond 2 decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The relative thicknesses of the OIL on each adhesive were not affected by the cure time (p > 0.05). Although the DC of All-Bond 2 were statistically not different with increasing cure time (p > 0.05), those of One-Step and Adper Prompt showed an increasing trends with increasing cure time (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Increasing light-curing time did not affect on the relative thickness of the OIL of the adhesives, and in turn, on the SBS to dentin.
Keywords: Oxygen inhibited layer; Shear bond strength; FT-NIR; Light curing time

Table 1.

Mean shear bond strength of three dentin adhesive systems with increasing cure time (Mean ± S.D., n = 10, unit: MPa).

	10 sec	20 sec	30 sec	60 sec
All bond 2	26.44 ± 7.82^a	30.73 ± 5.52^a	17.81 ± 6.34^b	17.63 ± 5.02^b
One Step	20.46 ± 5.68^a	17.06 ± 6.13^a	15.26 ± 3.36^a	18.39 ± 5.25^a
Adper Prompt	15.96 ± 7.42^a	21.04 ± 4.78^b	22.62 ± 3.01^b	18.85 ± 3.03^b

* The same superscripts mean that they are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05)

Table 2.

The difference between the % absorbance of the second spectra obtained after curing and that of the third spectra obtained after removing overlying uncured layer with alcohol sponge (% Absorbance; Mean ± S.D., n = 8)

	10 sec	20 sec	30 sec	60 sec
All bond 2	0.0023 ± 0.00010^a	0.0022 ± 0.0003^a	0.0023 ± 0.0008^a	0.0022 ± 0.0006^a
One Step	0.0013 ± 0.0004^a	0.0011 ± 0.0002^a	0.0011 ± 0.0001^a	0.001 ± 0.0001^a
Adper Prompt	0.0017 ± 0.0004^a	0.0015 ± 0.0004^a	0.0018 ± 0.0002^a	0.0016 ± 0.0003^a

* The same superscripts mean that they are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05)

Table 3.

The degree of conversion of the three adhesives after curing with increasing cure time (Mean ± S.D., n = 8, Unit: %)

	10 sec	20 sec	30 sec	60 sec
All bond 2	40.05 ± 14.28^a	42.78 ± 7.37^a	47.28 ± 14.94^a	42.63 ± 16.87^a
One Step	57.42 ± 2.71^a	65.54 ± 6.59^b	63.18 ± 4.83^b	67.08 ± 3.47^b
Adper Prompt	19.69 ± 10.4^a	26.81 ± 10.46^a	32.23 ± 9.7^a	40.65 ± 14.95^b

^*The same superscripts mean that they are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05)

REFERENCES

1. Chappell FP, Cobb CM, Spencer P, Eick JD. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: a potential factor in adhesive bonding. J Prosthet Dent 72(2):183-188. 1994.Article PubMed
2. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265-273. 1982.Article PubMed
3. Perdigao J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 16:311-323. 2000.Article PubMed
4. Platt JA, Almeida J, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Rhodes B, Moore BK. The effect of double adhesive application on the shear bond strength to dentin of compomers using three one-bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 26:313-317. 2001.PubMed
5. Swift EJ, Wilder AD, May KN, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 22:194-199. 1997.PubMed
6. Venz S, Dickens B. Modified surface-active monomers for adhesive bonding to dentin. J Dent Res 72:582-586. 1993.Article PubMed PDF
7. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microten-sile bond strength. Oper Dent 26(1):97-104. 2001.PubMed
8. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 26(10):733-738. 1995.PubMed
9. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75(6):1404-1413. 1996.Article PubMed PDF
10. Lundin SA, Koch G. Cure profiles of visible light cured class II composite restoratives in vivo and in vitro. Dent Mater 8:7-9. 1992.PubMed
11. Eliades GC, Vougiouklakis GJ, Caputo AA. Degree of double bond conversion in light-curd composites. Dent Mater 3:19-25. 1987.PubMed
12. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorativeresins. J Biomed Mater Res 20:121-131. 1986.Article PubMed
13. Cho BH, Dickens SH. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater in press 2004.Article PubMed
14. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79:812-817. 2000.Article PubMed PDF
15. Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Yamashita T, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite. Am J Dent 15(3):159-163. 2002.PubMed
16. Van Meerbeeek, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434-1442. 1993.Article PubMed PDF
17. Tassery H, de Donato P, Barres O, Dejou J. In vitro assessment of polymerization procedures in Class II restorations: sealing, FTIR, and microhardness evaluations. J Adhes Dent 3(3):247-255. 2001.PubMed
18. Ruyter IE. Unpolymerized surface layers on sealants. Acta Odontol Scand 39(1):27-32. 1981.Article PubMed
19. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Torney DL. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites : bond strength. J Dent Res 63:1241-1244. 1984.Article PubMed PDF
20. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 69(10):1652-1658. 1990.Article PubMed PDF
21. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 61(6):791-795. 1982.Article PubMed PDF
22. Lovell LG, Lu H, Elliott JE, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. The effect of cure rate on the mechanical properties of dental resins. Dent Mater 17:504-511. 2001.Article PubMed
23. Dickens SH, Milos MF. Relationship of dentin shear bond strengths to different laboratory test designs. Am J Dent 15(3):185-192. 2002.PubMed
24. Finger WJ, Lee KS, Podszun W. Monomers with low oxygen inhibition as enamel/dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 12(4):256-261. 1996.Article PubMed
25. Lovell LG, Newman SM, Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer compos-itetionon the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res 78(8):1469-1476. 1999.Article PubMed PDF
26. Stansbury JW, Dickens SH. Determination of double bond conversion in dental resins by near infrared spectroscopy. Dent Mater 17(1):71-79. 2001.Article PubMed
27. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J Dent 28(6):447-452. 2000.Article PubMed
28. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Trevor Burke FJ, Marquis PM, Randall RC. Monomer conversion versus flexure strength of a novel dental composite. J Dent 31(5):341-351. 2003.Article PubMed

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Influence of the curing time for the adhesive on the oxygen-inhibited layer thickness and the shear bond strength to dentin

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29(2):177-184. Published online January 14, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.177

XML Download

Influence of the curing time for the adhesive on the oxygen-inhibited layer thickness and the shear bond strength to dentin

	10 sec	20 sec	30 sec	60 sec
All bond 2	26.44 ± 7.82^a	30.73 ± 5.52^a	17.81 ± 6.34^b	17.63 ± 5.02^b
One Step	20.46 ± 5.68^a	17.06 ± 6.13^a	15.26 ± 3.36^a	18.39 ± 5.25^a
Adper Prompt	15.96 ± 7.42^a	21.04 ± 4.78^b	22.62 ± 3.01^b	18.85 ± 3.03^b

	10 sec	20 sec	30 sec	60 sec
All bond 2	0.0023 ± 0.00010^a	0.0022 ± 0.0003^a	0.0023 ± 0.0008^a	0.0022 ± 0.0006^a
One Step	0.0013 ± 0.0004^a	0.0011 ± 0.0002^a	0.0011 ± 0.0001^a	0.001 ± 0.0001^a
Adper Prompt	0.0017 ± 0.0004^a	0.0015 ± 0.0004^a	0.0018 ± 0.0002^a	0.0016 ± 0.0003^a

	10 sec	20 sec	30 sec	60 sec
All bond 2	40.05 ± 14.28^a	42.78 ± 7.37^a	47.28 ± 14.94^a	42.63 ± 16.87^a
One Step	57.42 ± 2.71^a	65.54 ± 6.59^b	63.18 ± 4.83^b	67.08 ± 3.47^b
Adper Prompt	19.69 ± 10.4^a	26.81 ± 10.46^a	32.23 ± 9.7^a	40.65 ± 14.95^b

Table 1. Mean shear bond strength of three dentin adhesive systems with increasing cure time (Mean ± S.D., n = 10, unit: MPa).

* The same superscripts mean that they are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05)

Table 2. The difference between the % absorbance of the second spectra obtained after curing and that of the third spectra obtained after removing overlying uncured layer with alcohol sponge (% Absorbance; Mean ± S.D., n = 8)

* The same superscripts mean that they are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05)

Table 3. The degree of conversion of the three adhesives after curing with increasing cure time (Mean ± S.D., n = 8, Unit: %)

The same superscripts mean that they are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05)