Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Thermoplasticized"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Basic Research
Rheological characterization of thermoplasticized injectable gutta percha and resilon
Juhea Chang, Seung-Ho Baek, In-Bog Lee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36(5):377-384.   Published online September 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.377
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to observe the change in the viscoelastic properties of thermoplasticized injectable root canal filling materials as a function of temperature and to compare the handling characteristics of these materials.

Materials and Methods

Three commercial gutta perchas and Resilon (Pentron Clinical Technologies) in a pellet form were heated in the Obtura-II system (Obtura Spartan) at 140℃ and 200℃, and the extrusion temperature of the thermoplasticized materials was measured. The viscoelastic properties of the materials as a function of temperature were evaluated using a rheometer. The elastic modulus G', viscous modulus G", loss tangent tan δ, and complex viscosity η* were determined. The phase transition temperature was determined by both the rheometer and a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The consistency of the materials was compared under compacting pressure at 60℃ and 40℃ by a squeeze test.

Results

The three gutta perchas had dissimilar profiles in viscoelastic properties with varying temperature. The phase transition of softened materials into solidification occurred at 40℃ to 50℃, and the onset temperatures obtained by a rheometer and a DSC were similar to each other. The onset temperature of phase transition and the consistency upon compaction pressure were different among the materials (p < 0.05). Resilon had a rheologically similar pattern to the gutta perchas, and was featured between high and low-flow gutta perchas.

Conclusions

The rheological characteristics of the thermoplasticized root canal filling materials changed under a cooling process. The dissimilar viscoelastic properties among the materials require different handling characteristics during an injecting and compacting procedure.

  • 17 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Original Article
A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques in ribbon-shaped canals : adaptation to canal walls
Hyun-sook Hwang, Kyung-mo Cho, Jin-woo Kim
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27(4):411-420.   Published online July 31, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.411
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The aim of this study is to compare the adaptability of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha technique to the canal walls in ribbon-shaped canals.

Thirty resin models simulated ribbon-shape canals were instrumented to #40 using .06 taper Profile systems. Three groups of each 10 resin models were obturated by the lateral condensation technique(LC) and the two thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha technique; Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II(EO) and Ultrafil Firmset(UF), respectively.

After resin model were kept at room temperature for 4 days, they were resected horizontally with microtome at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5mm levels from apex. At each levels, image of resected surface were taken using CCD camera under a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification and stored. Ratio of the area of gutta-percha was obtained by calculating area of gutta-percha cone to the total area of canal using digitized image-analyzing program. The data were collected then analyzed statistically using One-way ANOVA.

The results were as follows.

1. At 1mm levels, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean ratio of gutta-percha among the groups.

2. At 2mm level, EO showed the highest mean ratio of gutta-percha (p<0.05) and there was no significant difference between LC and UF.

3. At 3, 4, 5mm levels, EO and UF had significantly greater mean ratio of gutta-percha than LC(p<0.05) and there was no significant difference between EO and UF.

In conclusion, the thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques demonstrated relatively favorable adaptability to canal walls than lateral condensation technique in ribbon-shaped canals except for 1mm level.

  • 18 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP