Chemical characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and its hydration reaction

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(4):188-193

Publication date (electronic) : 2012 November 21

doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.188

Center for Health Promotion, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence to Seok-Woo Chang, DDS, MSD, PhD. Assistant Professor, Center for Health Promotion, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea 135-710. TEL, +82-2-3410-2420; FAX, +82-2-3410-0038; swc2007smc@gmail.com

Received 2012 May 21; Revised 2012 August 17; Accepted 2012 August 28.

Abstract

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was developed in early 1990s and has been successfully used for root perforation repair, root end filling, and one-visit apexification. MTA is composed mainly of tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate. When MTA is hydrated, calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) and calcium hydroxide is formed. Formed calcium hydroxide interacts with the phosphate ion in body fluid and form amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) which finally transforms into calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA). These mineral precipitate were reported to form the MTA-dentin interfacial layer which enhances the sealing ability of MTA. Clinically, the use of zinc oxide euginol (ZOE) based materials may retard the setting of MTA. Also, the use of acids or contact with excessive blood should be avoided before complete set of MTA, because these conditions could adversely affect the hydration reaction of MTA. Further studies on the chemical nature of MTA hydration reaction are needed.

Keywords: Calcium hydroxide; Calcium silicate hydrate; Dicalcium silicate; Hydration; Mineral trioxide aggregate; Tricalcium silicate

Introduction

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was developed in early 1990s by Torabinejad and Dentsply Tulsa Dental (ProRoot MTA, Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN, USA). MTA was originally developed for perforation repair and root end filling.1,2 And due to its clinical success, MTA has expanded its uses to one-visit apexification, pulp capping, and so on.3,4 Since its introduction to endodontics, MTA has shown great clinical success due to its good sealing ability and biocompatibility.5,6 Among many advantages of MTA, main and unique advantage is that the setting of MTA is not adversely affected by presence of water. Indeed, MTA needs water in its setting reaction, thus it is considered hydrophilic and water tolerant. Considering that the traditional root perforation repair materials such as composite resin and glass ionomer are sensitive to the existence of water, water tolerance of MTA is believed to be its unique advantage which results in clinical success. However, until now, the setting reaction and the reaction product of hydrated MTA has not been fully investigated and clearly understood, although the setting mechanism and hydration products of MTA have significant effects on the chemical and physical properties of MTA. Thus, the aim of this article is to review the chemical characteristics and the hydration reaction of MTA.

Materials and Methods

Pubmed search was used in preparation of this article. The keywords used for search of the articles were 'mineral trioxide aggregate + hydration' and 'mineral trioxide aggregate + interface'. Some articles which were hand-searched regarding these key words were also included. Articles written in language other than English were excluded.

Chemical constitutions of MTA

United States (US) patent #5415547 and #5769638 exclaims that the principal component of grey ProRoot MTA is Portland cement.7 Other US patents regarding the white ProRoot MTA (US patent #20030159618, #2004226478, #20050263036) showed that the chemical ingredients of white aggregate is not identical to that of grey MTA.

MTA is composed of complex compounds. Main constituents of MTA are tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate.8-10 In addition, MTA contains relatively small amount of tricalcium aluminate and tetracalcium aluminoferrite. To increase radiopacity, bismuth oxide was added in MTA. It was well known in cement chemistry, that tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate are made from lime (CaO) and silica (SiO₂).11,12 These and some other raw materials such as aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) and ferric oxide (Fe₂O₃) are heated in clinker to form four phases of tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate and tetracalcium aluminoferrite. Among these, tricalcium aluminate was known to reduce the setting time of MTA.13 Thus, lime, silica, aluminum oxide, ferric oxide, and bismuth trioxide are the main oxides that constitute MTA. Asagary et al. also confirmed that the grey and white MTA are composed mainly of lime (CaO), silica (SiO₂) and bismuth oxide (Bi₂O₃).7 They also reported that white MTA contained significantly lesser amount of aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), magnesium oxide (MgO) and ferric oxide (Fe₂O₃) than grey MTA.7

Heavy metal contents in MTA

It has been widely known that MTA and Portland cement are very similar in their chemical compositions.14,15 In this regard, there have been studies which compared the constituting elements of MTA and Portland cement. In 2007, Chang and Bae reported that MTA and Portland cement have similar elemental compositions.16 Chang et al. also demonstrated that MTA and Portland are composed of similar oxides and phases.17 However, there are still differences between Portland cement and MTA in heavy metal contents.18 In a previous study of Chang et al., which used mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid ('aqua-regia') for leaching various heavy metals from MTA and Portland cement, it was known that MTA contained significantly less arsenic, lead, chromium than Portland cement.19 From this study, it was recognized that the purity of MTA and Portland cement is not comparable. White MTA contains much less iron than gray MTA.19 However, white MTA still contains considerable amount of iron which could be a possible cause of tooth discoloration.20 The cause and effect relationship between tooth discoloration and iron contents of MTA needs further investigation. The other study carried out by the same author also showed that ProRoot MTA is free of lead and hexavalent chromium which were known to be calcinogen.21 Another study of Schembri et al. also reported that MTA contained lesser amount of arsenic than Portland cement.22 Matsunage et al. proclaimed that ProRoot MTA is safe material in terms of heavy metal contents.23 Considering these reports, clinical use of ProRoot MTA appears to be safe in terms of its heavy metal contents.19,21

Hydration product of MTA

Hydration reaction of MTA was reported to be similar to that of Portland cement. The setting reaction of MTA and Portland cement is a complex process. At first, the particles of tricalcium silicate react with water. In this process, the periphery of the tricalcium silicate powder is melted and form calcium silicate hydrate.24 Calcium silicate hydrate is known to be composed of calcium and silicon which were derived from MTA and hydroxyl ion which is supplied from mixing liquid. ProRoot MTA contains bismuth oxide as a radiopacifier. In this reason, in the setting reaction of ProRoot MTA, it was reported that bismuth is incorporated into calcium silicate hydrate and to form calcium-silicate-bismuth-hydrate, which is similar to calcium silicate hydrate.25

Another hydration reaction occurs between tricalcium aluminate and water. This reaction results in ettringite in the presence of gypsum, and eventually yield monosulfate once the gypsum was depleted.26 However, this reaction product is reported to be produced in quite smaller quantities than calcium silicate hydrate gels because the quantities of tricalcium aluminate contained in MTA is much smaller than tricalcium silicate.

Previous study reported that calcium silicate hydrate is a solid gel which shows amorphous appearance. As the setting process continues, the amounts of formed calcium silicate hydrate increases and occupy the voids between the particles. The presence of calcium silicate hydrate gel in hydration process of MTA has been reported in many previous reports.24-29

The other product which is formed as a result of setting reaction of MTA is calcium hydroxide. Calcium hydroxide is known to be formed as a result of the hydration reaction of MTA.8 Calcium hydroxide explains the high pH of MTA. And it was postulated that the formation of calcium hydroxide attributed the hard tissue forming ability of MTA. As the setting reaction further progresses, the formed calcium hydroxide reacts with calcium sulfate to form ettringite.30 Calcium hydroxide also reacts with phosphate ion to form amorphous calcium phosphate which eventually yields hydroxyapatite.31-33 In other words, as the MTA matures in phosphate containing body fluids, the calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA) is formed at the surface of MTA. CDHA is composed of calcium released from MTA, phosphate ion and hydroxyl ion which are contained in body fluids. Previous studies reported that the type and the morphology of CDHA formed in Dentin-MTA interfaces were various and tended to be dependent on pH, Ca/P ratio, and the type of solution in which the MTA-dentin interface is exposed.34

Effect of pH on hydration reaction of MTA

It was reported that physical and chemical properties of MTA are adversely affected in a low-pH environment.35 It was also reported that the quality of crystals which is a reaction product of hydrated MTA was poor in acidic pH compared to alkaline pH.35 Another study recommended that the acid-etching of ProRoot MTA should be delayed until 96 hours after MTA placement to avoid the harmful effect of acid etching on MTA surface.36 Regarding the alkaline environment, there is a report that calcium hydroxide induced alkalinity increased porosity and unhydrated microstructure of MTA.34 Generally, there is no consensus on whether the calcium hydroxide affects the sealability of MTA.37,38 In this sense, further studies on the effect of calcium hydroxide on hydration reaction of MTA is necessary.

Interface between MTA and dentin

Although the superior sealing ability of MTA was well documented and reported, there has been relatively scarce study on the morphology of MTA-dentin interface.39,40 Recently, Reyes-Carmona studied and reported the interfacial layer formed between MTA and dentin.41,42 Reyes-carmona et al. and Dreger et al. reported that this interfacial layer was formed as a result of biomineralization and some tag-like structures were formed in this process.40,41 These were the pioneering reports that the tag-like structures was formed in MTA-dentin interface. Bird et al. also reported that the interfacial layer made of hydroxyapatite was formed between MTA and dentin.39 Based on these studies, it could be postulated that the superior sealing ability of MTA could be partly attributed to the formation of tag-like structures in MTA-dentin interface. It was interesting that MTA produced more MTA tag-like structures than Portland cement.40 It was also interesting finding that hydrated MTA immersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) produced more mineral precipitation than those immersed in distilled water.43 These tag-like structures are believed to be the result of ionic dissolution of MTA which resulted in growth and nucleation of the apatite layer.44,45 Dreger et al. reported that the calcium ions released from the cements diffused through the dentinal tubules and reacted with phosphate ions in the tissue fluids, and yield calcium phosphate.40 And eventually, this calcium phosphate incorporated other ions and matured into carbonated apatite (CDHA).40 This phenomenon suggested the possibility that the precipitated minerals formed the mineralized layer between MTA and dentin which yielded chemical bonding between MTA and dentin.33 Han and Okiji demonstrated that dentin which was in contact with MTA uptook Ca and Si from this calcium silicate based materials.46 They reported that the Ca and Si uptake of dentin caused chemical and structural modification of it, which might result in higher acid resistance and physical strength (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image which shows the formation of tag-like structures in Ortho MTA-dentin interface and in dentinal tubules. (a) in Ortho MTA-dentin interface (×1,000); (b) in dentinal tubules (×1,000). Courtesy of Dr. Joon-Sang Yoo.

Interaction between MTA and adjacent filling materials

In the procedures of perforation repair, MTA is placed and the other restorative materials such as glass ionomer (GI) cement or intermediate restorative material tend to be overlaid on top of it. However, the reports regarding the interaction between MTA and these filling materials are scarce. Camilleri reported that MTA interacted with adjacent restorative materials which resulted in elemental migration between MTA and other restorative materials.47 They also suggested that the zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE)-based cements should not be used adjacent to MTA because zinc causes retardation of cement hydration and increases porosity. They also reported that the placement of GI material on partially set MTA resulted in weakening of GI because it lost water to MTA during the hydration reaction of MTA.

Effects of blood or serum contact of MTA during hydration

Generally, it was known that MTA was very tolerable to the presence of blood or serum in its setting reaction. However, recently, studies were published regarding the effect of blood or serum contamination of MTA during hydration reaction. At first, in 2008, Tingey et al. reported that the surface of MTA set in water and fetal bovine serum (FBS) showed difference.48 According to their report, MTA set in the presence of water showed marked crystalline structures mostly assumed to be calcium product. However, the surface of MTA set at the presence of FBS showed globular appearance rather than crystalline one. Nekoofar et al. also reported that MTA which was set at the presence of fresh whole blood showed decreased compressive strength and the surface of the blood contaminated MTA showed absence of acicular crystalline structure formation.49 This result means that the blood contamination of unset MTA adversely affects the setting reaction and mechanical strength of MTA. The detrimental effect of serum incorporation in the hydration reaction of MTA was clearly shown by Kim et al. This study markedly demonstrated that the MTA samples exposed to FBS in their setting reaction did not harden properly.50 All of these studies speculate that some protein components in serum or whole blood prevent the complete hydration and complete setting of MTA. However, mechanism of this phenomenon needs to be verified in future studies.

Conclusions

MTA is mainly composed of tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate. MTA and Portland cement are similar in their chemical composition, however, MTA contains lower amounts of heavy metals than Portland cement. The hydration reaction of MTA mainly produces calcium silicate hydrate and calcium hydroxide. Calcium hydroxide could form CDHA in contact with body fluids. Calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide and CDHA forms the interfacial layers between MTA and dentin which results in good sealing ability of MTA. The use of ZOE-based materials may retard the setting of MTA. Also, the use of acidic primer or contact with excessive blood should be avoided before complete set of MTA, because these conditions could adversely affect the hydration reaction of MTA.

Notes

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (2011-0014231) and also supported by Samsung Biomedical Research Institute grant (SBRI C-B1-310-1), and Samsung Medical Center Clinical Research Development Program grant (CRS-111-14-1).

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1993;19:541–544. 8151240.

2. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 1995;21:349–353. 7499973.

3. Kim US, Shin SJ, Chang SW, Yoo HM, Oh TS, Park DS. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage resistance of an ultrasonically placed mineral trioxide aggregate orthograde apical plug in teeth with wide open apexes: a preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e52–e56. 19327633.

4. Parirokh M, Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Kakoei S, Samiee M. A comparative study of using a combination of calcium chloride and mineral trioxide aggregate as the pulp-capping agent on dogs' teeth. J Endod 2011;37:786–788. 21787489.

5. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod 2010;36:190–202. 20113774.

6. Bodrumlu E. Biocompatibility of retrograde root filling materials: a review. Aust Endod J 2008;34:30–35. 18352901.

7. Asgary S, Parirokh M, Eghbal MJ, Brink F. Chemical differences between white and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2005;31:101–103. 15671818.

8. Camilleri J. Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2007;40:462–470. 17459120.

9. Song JS, Mante FK, Romanow WJ, Kim S. Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray ProRoot MTA, white ProRoot MTA, and gray MTA-Angelus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:809–815. 17138186.

10. Belío-Reyes IA, Bucio L, Cruz-Chavez E. Phase composition of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate by X-ray powder diffraction. J Endod 2009;35:875–878. 19482189.

11. Asgary S, Parirokh M, Eghbal MJ, Brink F. A comparative study of white mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cements using X-ray microanalysis. Aust Endod J 2004;30:89–92. 15633796.

12. Camilleri J, Kralj P, Veber M, Sinagra E. Characterization and analyses of acid-extractable and leached trace elements in dental cements. Int Endod J 2012;45:737–743. 22394277.

13. Liu WN, Chang J, Zhu YQ, Zhang M. Effect of tricalcium aluminate on the properties of tricalcium silicate-tricalcium aluminate mixtures: setting time, mechanical strength and biocompatibility. Int Endod J 2011;44:41–50. 20812942.

14. Hwang YC, Lee SH, Hwang IN, Kang IC, Kim MS, Kim SH, Son HH, Oh WM. Chemical composition, radiopacity, and biocompatibility of Portland cement with bismuth oxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e96–e102. 19157923.

15. Dammaschke T, Gerth HU, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Dent Mater 2005;21:731–738. 15935463.

16. Chang SW, Bae KS. Analysis of chemical constitutions of MTA and 3 Portland cements. J Korean Acad Stomatog Func Occ 2007;23:79–84.

17. Chang SW, Yoo HM, Park DS, Oh TS, Bae KS. Ingredients and cytotoxicity of MTA and 3 kinds of Portland cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2008;33:369–376.

18. Monteiro Bramante C, Demarchi AC, de Moraes IG, Bernadineli N, Garcia RB, Spångberg LS, Duarte MA. Presence of arsenic in different types of MTA and white and gray Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:909–913. 18835535.

19. Chang SW, Shon WJ, Lee W, Kum KY, Baek SH, Bae KS. Analysis of heavy metal contents in gray and white MTA and 2 kinds of Portland cement: a preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:642–646. 20303061.

20. Bodanezi A, Carvalho N, Silva D, Bernardineli N, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, de Moraes IG. Immediate and delayed solubility of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:127–131. 19089204.

21. Chang SW, Baek SH, Yang HC, Seo DG, Hong ST, Han SH, Lee Y, Gu Y, Kwon HB, Lee W, Bae KS, Kum KY. Heavy metal analysis of ortho MTA and ProRoot MTA. J Endod 2011;37:1673–1676. 22099903.

22. Schembri M, Peplow G, Camilleri J. Analyses of heavy metals in mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod 2010;36:1210–1215. 20630301.

23. Matsunaga T, Tsujimoto M, Kawashima T, Tsujimoto Y, Fujiwara M, Ookubo A, Hayashi Y. Analysis of arsenic in gray and white mineral trioxide aggregates by using atomic absorption spectrometry. J Endod 2010;36:1988–1990. 21092818.

24. Camilleri J. Characterization and hydration kinetics of tricalcium silicate cement for use as a dental biomaterial. Dent Mater 2011;27:836–844. 21600643.

25. Camilleri J. Hydration characteristics of calcium silicate cements with alternative radiopacifiers used as root-end filling materials. J Endod 2010;36:502–508. 20171371.

26. Camilleri J. The chemical composition of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:141–143. 20351970.

27. Formosa LM, Mallia B, Bull T, Camilleri J. The microstructure and surface morphology of radiopaque tricalcium silicate cement exposed to different curing conditions. Dent Mater 2012;28:584–595. 22410112.

28. Camilleri J, Cutajar A, Mallia B. Hydration characteristics of zirconium oxide replaced Portland cement for use as a root-end filling material. Dent Mater 2011;27:845–854. 21571360.

29. Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2008;41:408–417. 18298574.

30. Camilleri J. Characterization and chemical activity of Portland cement and two experimental cements with potential for use in dentistry. Int Endod J 2008;41:791–799. 18798923.

31. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Rueggeberg FA, Loushine RJ, Weller RN. Calcium phosphate phase transformation produced by the interaction of the portland cement component of white mineral trioxide aggregate with a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod 2007;33:1347–1351. 17963961.

32. Bozeman TB, Lemon RR, Eleazer PD. Elemental analysis of crystal precipitate from gray and white MTA. J Endod 2006;32:425–428. 16631841.

33. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2005;31:97–100. 15671817.

34. Saghiri MA, Lotfi M, Saghiri AM, Vosoughhosseini S, Aeinehchi M, Ranjkesh B. Scanning electron micrograph and surface hardness of mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of alkaline pH. J Endod 2009;35:706–710. 19410088.

35. Lee YL, Lee BS, Lin FH, Yun Lin A, Lan WH, Lin CP. Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials 2004;25:787–793. 14609667.

36. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandağ M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, Dummer PM. Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2009;42:1004–1014. 19732179.

37. Hachmeister DR, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd, Thomas DD. The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod 2002;28:386–390. 12033201.

38. Stefopoulos S, Tsatsas DV, Kerezoudis NP, Eliades G. Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:207–213. 18352926.

39. Bird DC, Komabayashi T, Guo L, Opperman LA, Spears R. In vitro evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and biomineralization ability of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 2012;38:1093–1096. 22794212.

40. Dreger LA, Felippe WT, Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe GS, Bortoluzzi EA, Felippe MC. Mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement promote biomineralization in vivo. J Endod 2012;38:324–329. 22341069.

41. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. Biomineralization ability and interaction of mineral trioxide aggregate and white portland cement with dentin in a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod 2009;35:731–736. 19410094.

42. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod 2010;36:286–291. 20113792.

43. Han L, Okiji T, Okawa S. Morphological and chemical analysis of different precipitates on mineral trioxide aggregate immersed in different fluids. Dent Mater J 2010;29:512–517. 20823620.

44. Khor KA, Li H, Cheang P, Boey SY. In vitro behavior of HVOF sprayed calcium phosphate splats and coatings. Biomaterials 2003;24:723–735. 12485791.

45. Weng J, Liu Q, Wolke JG, Zhang X, de Groot K. Formation and characteristics of the apatite layer on plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings in simulated body fluid. Biomaterials 1997;18:1027–1035. 9239464.

46. Han L, Okiji T. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2011;44:1081–1087. 21777256.

47. Camilleri J. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the material interface of adjacent layers of dental materials. Dent Mater 2011;27:870–878. 21565396.

48. Tingey MC, Bush P, Levine MS. Analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate surface when set in the presence of fetal bovine serum. J Endod 2008;34:45–49. 18155490.

49. Nekoofar MH, Stone DF, Dummer PM. The effect of blood contamination on the compressive strength and surface microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2010;43:782–791. 20609024.

50. Kim Y, Kim S, Shin YS, Jung IY, Lee SJ. Failure of setting of mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of fetal bovine serum and its prevention. J Endod 2012;38:536–540. 22414845.

Article information Continued

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.