Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Effect of Er:YAG lasing on the dentin bonding strength of two-step adhesives


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Effect of Er:YAG lasing on the dentin bonding strength of two-step adhesives

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2011;36(5):409-418
Publication date (electronic) : 2011 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.409
Byeong-Choon Song, DDS, PhD1, Young-Gon Cho, DDS, MSD, PhD1, Myung-Seon Lee, RDH2
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, Gwangju, Korea.
2Department of Dental Hygiene, SeoYeong University, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence to Young-Gon Cho, DDS, MSD, PhD. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, 421 Seosuk-dong Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea 501-825. TEL, +82-62-220-3845; FAX, +82-62-223-9064; ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr
Received 2011 July 29; Revised 2011 August 29; Accepted 2011 August 29.

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) and bonding interfaces of two-step total-etching and self-etching adhesive systems to three etch types of dentin either the acid etched, laser etched or laser and acid etched.

Materials and Methods

The occlusal dentinal surfaces of thirty human molars were used. They were divided into six groups: group 1, 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE); group 2, Er:YAG laser (KEY Laser 3, KaVo) + Single Bond 2; group 3, Er:YAG laser + 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2; group 4, Clearfil SE Primer + Bond (Kuraray); group 5, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Bond; group 6, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Primer + Bond. The samples were subjected to µSBS testing 24 hr after bonding. Also scanning microscopic evaluations were made on the resin-dentin interfaces of six specimens.

Results

The µSBS of group 2 was significantly lower than that of groups 1 and 3 in Single Bond 2 (p < 0.05). There were significant differences among the uSBS of groups 4, 5, and 6 in Clearfil SE Bond (p < 0.05). Very short and slender resin tags were observed in groups 2 and 5. Long and slender resin tags and lateral branches of tags were observed in groups 3 and 6.

Conclusions

Treatment of dentin surface using phosphoric acid or self-etching primer improved the adhesion of Er:YAG lased dentin.

Keywords: Bonding interfaces; Er:YAG lasing; Microshear bond strength; Two-step adhesives

Notes

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000. 299–116.
2. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 1998. 23185–194.
3. Hibst R, Keller U, Steiner R. Die wirkung gepulster Er:YAG Laserstrhlung auf zahngewebe. Lasers Sur Med 1988. 4163–165.
4. Sakakibara Y, Ishimaru K, Takamizu M. A study on bond strength to dentin irradiated by Erbium:YAG laser. Jpn J Conservative Dent 1998. 41207–219.
5. Barceleiro Mde O, de Mello JB, de Mello GS, Dias KR, de Miranda MS, Sampaio Filho HR. Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser. Oper Dent 2005. 30304–310.
6. Gimbel CB. Hard tissue laser procedures. Dent Clin North Am 2000. 44931–953.
7. Keller U, Hibst R. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances:II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 1989. 9345–351.
8. Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J Dent Res 1996. 75599–605.
9. Sassi JF, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. Comparative study of the dentin/adhesive systems interface after treatment with Er:YAG laser and acid etching using scanning electron microscope. Lasers Surg Med 2004. 34385–390.
10. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Scrpelli F, Vitale M. SEM analysis of dentin treated with the Er:YAG laser: a pilot study of the consequences resulting from laser use on adhesion mechanism. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2004. 2235–41.
11. Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2005. 21616–624.
12. Martínez-Insua A, Da Silva Dominguez L, Rivera FG, Santana-Penín UA. Differnces in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-trated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000. 84280–288.
13. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. Bonding of self-etching and total-etch systems to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. Tensile bond strength and scanning electron microscopy. Braz Dent J 2004. 15(Spec No)SI9–SI20.
14. Bertrand MF, Semez G, Leforestier E, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP. Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers Surg Med 2006. 38615–623.
15. Van Meerbeek B, De Munk J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strength of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003. 28647–660.
16. Eguro T, Maeda T, Otsuki M, Nishimura Y, Katsuumi I, Tanaka H. Adhesion of Er-YAG laser-irradiated dentin and composite resins: application of various treatments on irradiated surface. Lasers Surg Med 2002. 30267–272.
17. Bertrand MF, Rocca JP. Er:YAG laser and conservative dentistry. EMS-Stomatologie 2005. 1104–115.
18. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledane M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001. 17340–346.
19. Moon YH, Kim JR, Choi KK, Park SJ. The Effect of thermocycling on the durability of dentin adhesive systems. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007. 32222–235.
20. Kim CY, Shin DH. Microleakage of composite resin restoration according to the number of thermocycling. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007. 32377–384.
21. Kim YM, Park JW, Lee CY, Song YJ, Seo DK, Rho BD. The influence of cavity configuration on the microtensile bond strength between composite resin and dentin. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2008. 33472–480.
22. Kameyama A, Aizawa K, Kato J, Hirai Y. Tensile bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesives to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2009. 273–10.
23. Oliveira DC, Manhães LA, Marques MM, Matos AB. Microtensile bond strength analysis of different adhesive systems and dentin prepared with high-speed and Er:YAG laser: a comparative study. Photomed Laser Surg 2005. 23219–224.
24. de Oliveira MT, de Freitas PM, de Paula Eduardo C, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Influence of diamond sono-abrasion, air-abrasion and Er:YAG laser irradiation on bonding of different adhesive systems to dentin. Eur J Dent 2007. 1158–166.
25. Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Yazici E, Gorucu J, Gutknecht N. Shear bond strength of composite bonded to erbium:yttrium -aluminum-garnet laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2009. 24117–122.
26. Bertrand MF, Hessleyer D, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface after Er:YAG laser preparation. Lasers Surg Med 2004. 3551–57.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2011 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Figure 1

Figure 1

Scanning electron microscophic photograph showing the hybrid layer (H) and many taper resin tags with lateral branches (LB) in Group 1.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Scanning electron microscophic photograph showing the wide gap (G) and few short and slender resin tags in Group 2.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Scanning electron microscophic photograph showing the hybrid layer (H), slender and long rod shaped resin tags with lateral branches (LB) in Group 3.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Scanning electron microscophic photograph showing the hybrid layer (H) and many long rod shaped resin tags with lateral branches (LB) in Group 4.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Scanning electron microscophic photograph showing the small gap (G) at the resin-dentin interface and short and slender resin tags in Group 5.

Figure 6

Figure 6

Scanning electron microscophic photograph showingthe hybrid layer (H) and few slender and long resin tags in Group 6.

Table 1

Adhesive systems and resin composite

Table 1

Table 2

Group classification by adhesive systems and etch types of dentin

Table 2

Table 3

Mean microshear bond strength (MPa) to dentin and failure mode

Table 3

G1, G4, Acid etch; G2, G5, Laser etch; G3, G6, Laser etch + acid etch.

G1, G2 and G3 used Single Bond 2. G4, G5 and G6 used Clearfil SE Bond.

Different superscripts indicate values of statistically significant difference by Kruskal-Wallis test, median test and Mann-Whitney test.