Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during desensitizing agent application


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during desensitizing agent application

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2010;35(5):313-320
Publication date (electronic) : 2010 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.313
Sun-Young Kim, DDS, PhD1, Eun-Joo Kim, DDS, PhD2, In-Bog Lee, DDS, PhD3
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, KyungHee University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Dental Hygiene, Dong-Nam Health University, Suwon, Korea.
3Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
Correspondence to In-Bog Lee, DDS, PhD. Associate professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, 275-1 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea 110-768. Tel, +82-2-2072-3953; Fax, +82-2-2072-3859; inboglee@snu.ac.kr
Received 2010 April 23; Revised 2010 April 23; Accepted 2010 April 27.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine changes in the dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during desensitizing agent application and to compare permeability after application among the agents.

Materials and Methods

A Class 5 cavity was prepared to exposure cervical dentin on an extracted human premolar which was connected to a sub-nanoliter fluid flow measuring device (NFMD) under 20 cm water pressure. DFF was measured from before application of desensitizing agent (Seal&Protect, SP; SuperSeal, SS; BisBlock, BB; Gluma desensitizer, GL; Bi-Fluoride 12, BF) through application procedure to 5 min after application.

Results

DFF rate after each desensitizing agent application was significantly reduced when compared to initial DFF rate before application (p < 0.05). SP showed a greater reduction in DFF rate than GL and BF did (p < 0.05). SS and BB showed a greater reduction in DFF rate than BF did (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Characteristic DFF aspect of each desensitizing agent was shown in NFMD during the application procedure.

Keywords: Dentin hypersensitivity; Dentinal fluid flow; Desensitizing agent; Fluid flow measuring device; Permeability

References

1. Brännström M, Lindén LA, Aström A. The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and of pulp fluid. A discussion of its significance in relation to dentinal sensitivity. Caries Res 1967. 1310–317.
2. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod 1986. 12465–474.
3. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol 1987. 14280–284.
4. Pashley DH. In : Addy M, Embrey G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, eds. Potential treatment modalities for dentine hypersensitivity: in-office products. Tooth wear and sensitivity: clinical advances in restorative dentistry 2000. London: Martis Dunitz; 351–365.
5. Vieira AH, Santiago SL. Management of dentinal hypersensitivity. Gen Dent 2009. 57120–126.
6. Lee IB, Kim MH, Kim SY, Chang J, Cho BH, Son HH, Back SH. Development of nano-fluid movement measuring device and its application to hydrodynamic analysis of dentinal fluid. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2008. 33141–147.
7. Kim SY, Cho BH, Baek SH, Lim BS, Lee IB. Real-time measurement of dentinal tubular fluid flow during and after amalgam and composite restorations. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2009. 34467–476.
8. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley D. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 1995. 21191–194.
9. Pashley DH, Stewart FP, Galloway SE. Effects of air-drying in vitro on human dentine permeability. Arch Oral Biol 1984. 29379–383.
10. Itthagarun A, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Wefel JS, Garclía-Godoy F, Wei SH. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition. Am J Dent 2004. 17394–400.
11. Camps J, About I, Van Meerbeek B, Franquin JC. Efficiency and cytotoxicity of resin-based desensitizing agents. Am J Dent 2002. 15300–304.
12. Pamir T, Dalgar H, Onal B. Clinical evaluation of three desensitizing agents in relieving dentin hypersensitivity. Oper Dent 2007. 32544–548.
13. Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG. Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments-an in vitro study. Dent Mater 2005. 21129–138.
14. Pashley DH, Galloway SE. The effects of oxalate treatment on the smear layer of ground surfaces of human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1985. 30731–737.
15. Greenhill JD, Pashley DH. The effects of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1981. 60686–698.
16. Paes Leme AF, dos Santos JC, Giannini M, Wada RS. Occlusion of dentin tubules by desensitizing agents. Am J Dent 2004. 17368–372.
17. Thrash WJ, Jones DL, Dodds WJ. Effect of a fluoride solution on dentinal hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 1992. 5299–302.
18. Yates RJ, Newcombe RG, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of a fluoride-sensitive teeth mouthrinse. J Clin Periodontol 2004. 31885–889.
19. Qin C, Xu J, Zhang Y. Spectroscopic investigation of the function of aqueous 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate/glutaraldehyde solution as a dentin desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci 2006. 114354–359.
20. Munksgaard EC. Amine-induced polymerization of aqueous HEMA/aldehyde during action as a dentin bonding agent. J Dent Res 1990. 691236–1239.
21. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Thomaidis S, Doukoudakis S. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 2005. 18291–295.
22. Ozen T, Orhan K, Avsever H, Tunca YM, Ulker AE, Akyol M. Dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical comparison of three different agents in a short-term treatment period. Oper Dent 2009. 34392–398.
23. Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 1997. 6338–41.
24. Ishihata H, Kanehira M, Nagai T, Finger WJ, Shimauchi H, Komatsu M. Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability. Am J Dent 2009. 22143–146.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2010 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Figure 1

Figure 1

(a) Schematic diagram of the sub-nanoliter scaled dentinal fluid flow measurement system connected to a specimen. (b) Specimen preparation.

Figure 2

Figure 2

A representative curve of consecutive dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during Bi-Fluoride 12 application. Upward (positive slope) movement vs time on graph indicates outward DFF, whereas downward (negative slope) movement indicates inward DFF. A, application of desensitizing agent; d, air dry.

Figure 3

Figure 3

A representative curve of consecutive DFF during Gluma desensitizer application. Upward (positive slope) movement vs time on graph indicates outward DFF, whereas downward (negative slope) movement indicates inward DFF. A, application of desensitizing agent; d, air dry; r, rinse.

Figure 4

Figure 4

A representative curve of consecutive DFF during BisBlock application. Upward (positive slope) movement vs time on graph indicates outward DFF, whereas downward (negative slope) movement indicates inward DFF. A, application of desensitizing agent; r, rinse.

Figure 5

Figure 5

A representative curve of consecutive DFF during SuperSeal application. Upward (positive slope) movement vs time on graph indicates outward DFF, whereas downward (negative slope) movement indicates inward DFF. A, application of desensitizing agent; ga, gentle air dry.

Figure 6

Figure 6

A representative curve of consecutive DFF during Seal&Protect application. Upward (positive slope) movement vs time on graph indicates outward DFF, whereas downward (negative slope) movement indicates inward DFF. A, application of desensitizing agent; LC, light-curing.

Figure 7

Figure 7

Reduction in dentinal fluid flow of desensitizing agents (%). Desensitizing agents under same bar did not show statistically significant difference.

Table 1

Components and application procedures of desensitizing agents used in this study

Table 1

Abbreviations: PENTA, dipentaerythritol penta acrylate mono monophosphate; HEMA, Hydroxyethylmethacrylate;E&R, acid etching and rinse.

aE&R were omitted in this study because it was already performed during specimen preparation.