Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Infection control of light curing units

Infection control of light curing units

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2010;35(4):235-237
Publication date (electronic) : 2010 July 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.4.235
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, Iksan, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Hoon-Sang Chang. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, 344-2 Shinyong-dong, Iksan, Jeonbuk, 570-210, Korea. Tel: +82-63-859-2931 Fax: +82-63-859-2932, husch03@wonkwang.ac.kr
Received 2010 June 17; Revised 2010 June 30; Accepted 2010 July 02.

Abstract

When curing the composite restorations with light curing units, the light guides are often in direct contact with oral tissues, therefore contamination of light guides is inevitable. Curing light guides fall into the "semicritical" instrument category according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and must be heat or vapor-sterilized or at a minimum, these semicritical instruments must be sterilized in a liquid chemical agent. Currently, most common methods of maintaining sterility of the light guides are wiping the guide with a disinfectant, such as glutaraldehyde, after each patient use; using autoclavable guides; using presterilized, single-use plastic guides; and using translucent disposable barriers to cover the guide.

References

1. Forss H, Widstrom E. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 2001. 59(2)57–62.
2. Leonard DL, Charlton DG, Hilton TJ. Effect of curing-tip diameter on the accuracy of dental radiometers. Oper Dent 1999. 24(1)31–37.
3. Rueggeberg FA, Jordan DM. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 1993. 6(4)364–370.
4. Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Curtis JW Jr. Clinical guidelines for photocuring restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1995. 126(9)1280–1286.
5. Caughman GB, Caughman WF, Napier N, Schuster GS. Disinfection of visible-light-curing devices. Oper Dent 1989. 14(1)2–7.
6. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Comer RW. The effect of autoclaving on energy transmission through light-curing tips. J Am Dent Assoc 1996. 127(8)1183–1187.
7. Nelson SK, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood PE. Effect of glutaraldehyde cold sterilants on light transmission of curing tips. Quintessence Int 1997. 28(11)725–730.
8. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF. Factors affecting light transmission of single-use, plastic light-curing tips. Oper Dent 1998. 23(4)179–184.
9. Chong SL, Lam YK, Lee FKF, Ramalingam L, Yeo ACP, Lim CC. Effect of various infection-control methods for light-cure units on the cure of composite resins. Oper Dent 1998. 23(3)150–154.
10. Pollington S, Kahakachchi N, van Noort R. The Influence of Plastic Light Cure Sheaths on the Hardness of Resin Composite. Oper Dent 2009. 34(6)741–745.

Article information Continued