Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2002;27(5):493-501
Publication date (electronic) : 2002 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.5.493
Young-Gon Cho, Kong-Chul Cho
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Abstract

This study evaluated the microleakage performance of four self-etcing primer adhesives(Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, UniFil Bond, and FL Bond) and one self-etching adhesive(Prompt L-Pop). Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 50 extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of five adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z 250(Group 1), Clearfil SE Bond/Clearfil AP-X(Group 2), Clearfil Liner Bond 2/Clearfil AP-X(Group 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4), and FL Bond/Filtek Z 250(Group 5).

Following one day storage in room temperature water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles between 5℃ and 55℃. Marginal microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye. After 24 hours, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests.

The results of this study were as follows;

1. The microleakges at both enamel and dentinal margins were the lowest in group 4, increasing among groups in the following order: group 2, follwed by group 5, follwed by group 1, and the highest in group 3.

2. At the enamel margins, the microleakage of group 3 was significantly higher than those of groups 2, 4 and 5(p<0.05), and also the microleakage of group 1 was statistically higher than those of groups 2 and 5(p<0.05).

3. At the dentinal margins, microleakage of group 3 was significantly higher than microleakages of groups 1, 2, 4 and 5(p<0.05).

4. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentinal margins of each group, groups 1, 4 and 5 at enamel margin and group 2 and group 3 at dentinal margin were higher microleakage. But there was no significant difference between enamel and dentinal microleakages of each group(p>0.05).

Keywords: Marginal microleakage; Self-etching primer adhesives; Self-etching adhesive

References

1. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trend in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000. 1325D–30D.
2. Davidson CL, Degee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and polymeriztion contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984. 63(12)1396–1399.
3. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000. 79(3)812–817.
4. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial mroleakage. Am J Dent 2001. 14(6)344–348.
5. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982. 11(6)439–450.
6. Brännström M. The cause of post-restorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986. 12475–481.
7. Buonocore MC. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955. 34(6)849–853.
8. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers-an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop 2001. 62(3)238–245.
9. Hannig M, Reinhardt K-J, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: An alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999. 24172–180.
10. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001. 29(1)55–61.
11. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001. 17(5)373–380.
12. Toledano M, Osorio R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001. 14(4)205–210.
13. Besnault C, Attal JP. Influence of a simulated oral environment on microleakage of two adhesive systems in Class II composite restorations. J Dent 2002. 30(1)1–6.
14. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998. 23244–249.
15. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002. 18(2)111–119.
16. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH. Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesives bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2000. 25163–169.
17. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992. 5(4)213–215.
18. Nakabayashi N. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int 1991. 22(2)73–74.
19. Nakabayashi N, Sami Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 1996. 75(9)1706–1715.
20. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift E Jr, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effect of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthet Dent 2000. 1285–96.
21. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 1998. 10599–105.
22. Miyasaka K, Nakabayashi N. Combination of EDTA conditioner and phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1999. 15(3)153–157.
23. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Effect of dentin primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999. 24(2)81–88.
24. Finger WJ, Ahlstrand WM. 4-META as an acidic monomer in an all-in-one experimental adhesive. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001. 2212 Suppl. 8–11.
25. Pontes DG, de Melo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 2002. 33(2)136–139.
26. Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001. 2697–104.
27. Inoue S, Van Meebeek B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd international Kuraray symposium 1999. 131–148.
28. Prati C, Pashley DH, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R. Marginal hybrid layer in class V restorations. Oper Dent 2000. 25228–233.
29. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT Jr. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent 1995. 8(6)289–293.
30. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 2000. 31353–358.
31. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 1998. 26609–616.
32. Kidd EA. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976. 4(5)199–206.
33. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH Jr, Puckett AD. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent 1995. 20(6)230–235.
34. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P. Effects of self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997. 10141–146.
35. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching timers on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997. 10(2)66–70.
36. Swift EJ Jr. Self-etching primers: Part I. J Esthet Dent 2000. 12(3)111–113.
37. Technical Brief : Unifil Bond, Unifil F composite 1999. GC Corporation;
38. Hotta K, Mogi M, Miura F, Nakabayashi N. Effects of 4-MET on bond strength and penetration monomers into enamel. Dent Mater 1992. 8173–175.
39. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 2001. 14(3)163–169.
40. Product Dossier: Prompt L-Pop 1999. ESPE;
41. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998. 26(7)555–562.
42. Nishida K, Yamauchi J, Wata T, Hosoda H. Development of a new bonding system. J Dent Res 1993. 72137. (IADR, Abstract #267).
43. Imazato S, Ebisu S, Tarumi H, Kinomoto Y, Takeshige F. Development of antibacterial adhesive system: efficacy of new self-etching primer containing antibacterial monomer. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd international Kuraray symposium 1999. 227–239.
44. Al-Ehaideb AA, Mohammed H. Microleakage of "one-bottle" dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 2001. 26172–175.
45. Tulunoglu O, Uctash M, Alacam A, Omurlu H. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modifed glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique. Oper Dent 2000. 25292–298.
46. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchll S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001. 14(3)132–136.
47. Barkmeier WW, Douville CJ, Matranga LF. Shear bond strength, microleakage and scanning electron microscopy study of the Clearfil Liner Bond System. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1993. 1(2)85–90.
48. Hanning M, Fu B. Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with self-etching primers. J Adhes Dent 2001. 3265–272.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2002 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Numbers of leakage scores of each group at enamel margins

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Numbers of leakage scores of each group at dentin margins

Table 1

Group classification and self-etching primer adhesives and self-etching adhesive/composite resins used in this study

Table 1

*: Manufacturers of adhesive and composite resin are not same in Group 5.

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and means at enamel margins

Table 2

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and means at dentin margins

Table 3

Table 4

Statistical analysis of microleakage at enamel margin between each group by Mann-Whitney test

Table 4

*: significant differences (p<0.05)

Table 5

Statistical analysis of microleakage at dentin margin between each group by Mann-Whitney test

Table 5

*: significant differences (p<0.05)

Table 6

Statistical analysis of microleakage at enamel and dentin margin between each group by Wilcoxon signed rank sum test

Table 6

-: no-significant differences(p>0.05)