Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
A COMPARISON OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IN CALCIUM HYDROXIDE REMOVAL

A COMPARISON OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IN CALCIUM HYDROXIDE REMOVAL

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2009;34(6):508-514
Publication date (electronic) : 2009 January 14
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.508
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University
*Corresponding Author: Jin-Woo Kim, Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Gangnung-Wonju National University 123 Chibyon-dong Gangneung, Gangwon-do, Korea, Tel: 82-33-640-3189 Fax: 82-33-640-3103 E-mail: mendo7@nukw.ac.kr
Received 2009 September 08; Revised 2009 October 23; Accepted 2009 October 27.

Abstract

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to compare the efficacy of irrigation systems by removing a calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) paste from the apical third of the root canal and the effect of the patency file. Sixty single rooted human teeth were used in this study. The canals were instrumented by a crown-down manner with .04 taper ProFile to ISO #35. Ca(OH)2 and distilled water were mixed and placed inside the root canals. The teeth were divided into 6 groups according to the root canal irrigation system and the use of patency file as follows: group 1 - conventional method; group 2 - EndoActivator®; group 3 - EndoVac®; group 4 - conventional method, patency; group 4 - EndoActivator®, patency; group 6 - EndoVac®, patency. All teeth were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite. After the root canal irrigation, the teeth were split in bucco-lingual aspect. Percentage of the root canal surface coverage with residual Ca(OH)2 until 3 mm from working length was analyzed using Image Pro Plus ver. 4.0. Statistical analysis was performed using the One-way ANOVA, t-test and Scheffe's post-hoc test. Conventional groups had significantly more Ca(OH)2 debris than EndoActivator®, EndoVac® groups. There was no significant difference between EndoActivator® and EndoVac® groups. Groups with patency file showed more effective in removing Ca(OH)2 paste than no patency groups, but, it was no significant difference. This study showed that EndoActivator® and EndoVac® systems were more effective in removing Ca(OH)2 paste from the apical third of the root canal than conventional method.

Figure 1.

Representative photograph of experimental groups.

Mean percentage of residual Ca(OH)2 of each group.

Statistical significance between no patency group and patency group

References

1. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1:170–175. 1985;
2. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Spa�ngberg L, Sundqvist G. The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J 24:119–125. 1991;
3. Estrela C, Pimenta FC, Ito IY, Bammann LB. Antimicrobial evaluation of calcium hydroxide in infect-ed dentinal tubules. J Endod 25:416–418. 1999;
4. 이 경선, 박 광균, 유 운정, 이 승종. 분자체 모델을 이용한 수종의 수산화칼슘 제재의 이온 용출에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회 지 27:632–643. 2002;
5. 남 욱, 박 상혁, 최 기운. 근관 형성 후 동통에 대한 수산화칼슘의 효과에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 31:86–95. 2006;
6. Mitchell DF, Shankwalker GB. Osteogenic potential of calcium hydroxide and other materials in soft tissue and bone wounds. J Dent Res 37:1157–1163. 1958;
7. Javelet J, Torabinejad M, Bakland L. Comparison of two pH levels for the induction of apical barriers in immature teeth of monkeys. J Endod 11:375–378. 1985;
8. Andreasen JO. Relationship between surface and inflammatory resorption and changes in the pulp after replantation of permanent incisors in monkeys. J Endod 7:294–301. 1981;
9. Cvek M. Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta-percha. A retrospective clinical study. Endod Dent Traumatol 8:45–55. 1992;
10. Ricucci D, Langeland K. Incomplete calcium hydroxide removal from the root canal: a case report. Int Endod J 30:418–421. 1997;
11. Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 25:431–433. 1999;
12. Kim SK, Kim YO. Influence of calcium hydroxide intra-canal medication on apical seal. Int Endod J 35:623–628. 2002;
13. 박 찬제, 전 경아, 권 호범. 수산화칼슘 제제의 제거 방법이 치근 단 누출에 미치는 영향에 대한 전기화학적 연구. 대한치과보존 학회지 31:186–191. 2006;
14. Lambrianidis T, Kosti E, Boutsioukis C, Mazinis M. Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine medicaments from the root canal. Int Endod J 39:55–61. 2006;
15. Lambrianidis T, Margelos J, Beltes P. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide dressing from the root canal. J Endod 25:85–88. 1999;
16. Wu MK, van der Sluis LWM, Wesselink PR. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 36:218–224. 2003;
17. van der Sluis LWM, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. Int Endod J 40:52–57. 2007;
18. Ciucchi B, Khettabi M, Holz J. The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 22:21–28. 1989;
19. O'Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, Baumgartner JC. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod 26:739–743. 2000;
20. Guerisoli DMZ, Marchesan MA, Walmsley AD, Lumley PJ, Pecora JD. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J 35:418–421. 2002;
21. Schoeffel GJ. The EndoVac method of endodontic irrigation, part 2 - efficacy. Dent Today 27:82–84. :86–87. 2008;
22. Ruddle CJ. Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics. Dent Today 26:110–112. :114–117. 2007;
23. Fukumoto Y, Kikuchi I, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration. Int Endo J 39:93–99. 2006;
24. Moodnik RM, Dorn SO, Feldman MJ, Levey M, Borden BG. Efficacy of biomechanical instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2:261–266. 1976;
25. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod 3:394–398. 1977;
26. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod 30:425–428. 2004;
27. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 13:147–152. 1987;
28. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 54:323–328. 1982;
29. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod 9:475–479. 1983;
30. Siqueira JF Jr, Arau、jo MCP, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJS. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 23:499–502. 1997;
31. Usman N, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 30:110–112. 2004;
32. Walters MJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Efficacy of irrigation with rotary instrumentation. J Endod 28:837–839. 2002;
33. Mehra P, Clancy C, Wu J. Formation of a facial hematoma during endodontic therapy. J Am Assoc 131:67–71. 2000;
34. Hu ¨lsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation - literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 33:186–193. 2000;
35. Reeh ES, Messer HH. Long-term paresthesia following inadvertent forcing of sodium hypochlorite through perforation in maxillary incisor. Endod Dent Traumatol 5:200–203. 1989;
36. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J. et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 29:170–175. 2003;
37. Khademi A, Yazdizadeh M, Feizianfard M. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems. J Endod 32:417–420. 2006;
38. Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Evaluation of glyde file prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant. J Endod 28:300–303. 2002;
39. Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 33:611–615. 2007;

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Representative photograph of experimental groups.

Table 1.

Mean percentage of residual Ca(OH)2 of each group.

Group N Mean(%) Std. Deviation
1 10 60.77a 10.94
2 10 27.04b,c 15.35
3 10 24.07c 9.44
4 10 44.99a,b 17.2
5 10 13.17c 8.85
6 10 11.02c 6.88

Mean values followed by the same superscript letter were not significantly different (p>0.05) according to Scheffe post hoc multiple comparisons.

Table 2.

Statistical significance between no patency group and patency group

  No patency / Patency
Group 1 / Group 4 0.219
Group 2 / Group 5 0.087
Group 3 / Group 6 0.329