Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Color difference of the dental composites measured by different color measuring instruments

Color difference of the dental composites measured by different color measuring instruments

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2009;34(3):199-207
Publication date (electronic) : 2009 May 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.199
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University, Korea.
Corresponding author: In-Nam Hwang. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry, Yongbong-ro 77, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 500-757, Korea. Tel. 82-62-530-5819, Fax. 82-62-530-5629, hinso@jnu.ac.kr
Received 2009 March 03; Revised 2009 March 26; Accepted 2009 April 23.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of color measuring instrument by measuring the color of dental composite resins.

Nine shade light cured composite resin disks were prepared (diameter : 15 mm, thickness : 4 mm). CIE L*a*b* color scale of each disk was measured with 3 different types of spectrophotometer [MiniScan XE plus (Model 4000S, Hunter Lab, USA), CM-3500d (Minolta, Japan) and Specbos 2100 Miniature VIS Reflection spectrometer (Serial No: 319416, JETI Technishe VIS Instrumentic GmbH, Germany)]. Miniscan XE Plus and CM-3500d using identical measuring geometry with different size of viewing aperture. But Specbos 2100 using different measuring geometry.

Within the limitation of this study, there were color difference (ΔE*) from 2.4 to 7.8 between Miniscan XE Plus and CM-3500d, but L*, a*, b* values showed the high correlation. However, there were great color difference (ΔE*) in the extent of about 20 between instruments with the different measuring geometry.

Therefore, color scale measured by color measuring instrument should be used as a relative value rather than an absolute value in the field of dentistry.

References

1. Clark EB. An analysis of tooth color. J Am Dent Assoc 1931. 182093–2103.
2. Clark EB. Tooth color selection. J Am Dent Assoc 1933. 201065–1073.
3. Hayashi T. Medical color standard. V. Tooth crown 1967. Tokyo: Japan Color Research Institute;
4. Miller LL. Organizing color in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1987. Spec No12. 26E–40E.
5. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimeter. J Dent Res 1989. 68819–822.
6. Hwang IN, Oh OM. Colorimetric analysis of extracted human teeth and five shade guides. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1997. 22769–781.
7. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II: Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973. 29556–566.
8. Goodkind RJ, Keenan KM, Schwabacher WB. A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurement of 100 natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1985. 53105–109.
9. Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guide. J Prosthet Dent 1990. 64425–431.
10. Yeh CL, Powers JM, Miyagawa Y. Color of selected shades of composites by reflection spectrophotometry. J Dent Res 1982. 611176–1179.
11. Jo KM, Shin DH, Gu NY. Color analysis of the natural teeth with a modified intraoral spectrophotometer. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1998. 23223–235.
12. Lee MY, Shin DH. New evaluation technique in teeth color using digital camera. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1997. 23325–333.
13. Kim HS, Um JM. A study on color differences between composite resins and shade guides. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1996. 21107–120.
14. Jo KH, Hwang IN, Choi HR, Oh OM. Comparative evaluation of light-cured composite resins based on vita shade by spectrocolorimeter. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1998. 23424–432.
15. Hwang IN, Lee KW. Translucency of light cured composite resins depends on thickness & its influence on color of restorations. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1999. 24604–613.
16. Swepston JH, Miller LL. Esthetic matching. J Prosthet Dent 1985. 54623–625.
17. Moon EB. Color System 2002. Seoul: Gukje; 215–271.
18. Park EJ. Basics of Color Moulding 1996. 2th edth ed. Seoul: Mijinsa; 56–194.
19. Park DY. Practical Chromatics 1992. enlarged editionth ed. Seoul: Bando; 99–120.
20. Korean Industrial Standards. KS A 0061
21. Goodkind RJ, Loupe MJ. Teaching of color in predoctoral and postdoctoral dental education in 1988. J Prosthet Dent 1992. 67713–717.
22. Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1970. 24166–173.
23. O'Neal SJ, Powell WD. Color discrimination and shade matching ability of third year dental student. J Dent Res 1984. 63174.
24. Van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Plasschaert AJ. A new method for matching tooth colors with color standard. J Dent Res 1985. 64837–841.
25. Gross MD, Moser JB. A colorimetric study of coffee and tee staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1977. 4311–322.
26. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetricassessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989. 681760–1764.
27. Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window color measurement particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994. 391133–1142.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Diagram of the Duplex-Fiber bundle.

Figure 2

L* value change of the Z-250 according to the measuring instrument and condition.Miniscan: MiniScan XE Plus

CD: Minolta CD-3500d

spec-O/D: Specbos 2100 with original measuring tip under dark.

spec-O/L: Specbos 2100 with original measuring tip under light.

spec-H/L: Specbos 2100 with handmade measuring tip under light.

Figure 3

a* value change of the Z-250 according to the measuring instrument and condition.

Figure 4

b* value change of the Z-250 according to the measuring instrument and condition.

Table 1

Products, shade, and manufacturers of tested composite resins

Table 1

Table 2

CIE L*a*b* values of Filtek Z-250 measured by MiniScan XE Plus and Minolta CM 3500d

Table 2

Standard deviations are in parentheses.

Table 3

CIE L*a*b* values of Filtek Z-250 measured by Specbos 2100 according to the used tip and measured condition

Table 3

Standard deviations are in parentheses

Table 4

Color difference(ΔE*) among different color measuring instruments in the Z-250

Table 4

H : MiniScan XE Plus

M : Minolta CD-3500d

Dark : Specbos 2100 with original measuring tip under dark.

Dark : Specbos 2100 with original measuring tip under dark.

Light : Specbos 2100 with original measuring tip under light.

HMT : Specbos 2100 with handmade measuring tip under light.