Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Physical properties of different self-adhesive resin cements and their shear bond strength on lithium disilicate ceramic and dentin


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Physical properties of different self-adhesive resin cements and their shear bond strength on lithium disilicate ceramic and dentin

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2009;34(3):184-191
Publication date (electronic) : 2009 May 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.184
Hye-Jin Shin1, Chang-Kyu Song2, Se-Hee Partk2, Jin-Woo Kim2, Kyung-Mo Cho2
1Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Ajou University, Korea.
2Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Kyung-Mo Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, 123 Chibyon-dong, Gangwon-do, 210-702, Korea. Tel: 82-33-640-3156, Fax: 82-33-642-6410, drbozon@kangnung.ac.kr
Received 2008 September 22; Revised 2009 April 09; Accepted 2009 April 14.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of different self-adhesive resin cements and their shear bond strength on dentin and lithium disilicate ceramic and compare these result with that of conventional resin cement. For this study, four self-adhesive resin cements (Rely-X Unicem, Embrace Wetbond, Mexcem, BisCem), one conventional resin cement (Rely-X ARC) and one restorative resin composite (Z-350) were used. In order to evaluate the physical properties, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and flexural strength were measured. To evaluate the shear bond strength on dentin, each cement was adhered to buccal dentinal surface of extracted human lower molars. Dentin bonding agent was applied after acid etching for groups of Rely-X ARC and Z-350. In order to evaluate the shear bond strength on ceramic, lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS Empress 2) disks were prepared. Only Rely-X ARC and Z-350 groups were pretreated with hydrofluoric acid and silane. And then each resin cement was adhered to ceramic surface in 2 mm diameter. Physical properties and shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine.

Results were as follows

1. BisCem showed the lowest compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and flexural strength. (P<0.05)

2. Self-adhesive resin cements showed significantly lower shear bond strength on the dentin and lithium disilicate ceramic than Rely-X ARC and Z-350 (P<0.05)

In conclusion, self-adhesive resin cements represent the lower physical properties and shear bond strength than a conventional resin cement.

Keywords: Self-adhesive resin cement; physical properties of resin cement; shear bond strength

References

1. Saygili G, Sahmali S. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003. 30(7)758–764.
2. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2003. 89(2)127–134.
3. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990. 21(10)823–831.
4. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003. 89(3)268–274.
5. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002. 18(8)609–621.
6. Oh SK, Heo B, Kim HC. The etching effects and microtensile bond strength of total etching and self-etching adhesive system on unground enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004. 29273–280.
7. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 2007. 97(4)216–222.
8. Technical data sheet: Rely X Unicem 2007. St Paul, USA: 3M ESPE;
9. Pereira PN, Okuda M, Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 1999. 15(1)46–53.
10. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002. 30(7-8)371–382.
11. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Carvalho RM, Grande RH. Durability of resin dentin interfaces: effects of surface moisture and adhesive solvent component. Dent Mater 2004. 20(7)669–676.
12. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998. 14(1)51–56.
13. Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990. 17(5)487–494.
14. Wood M, Kern M, Thompson VP, Romberg E. Ten-year clinical and microscopic evaluation of resin-bonded restorations. Quintessence Int 1996. 27(12)803–807.
15. Cho MH, Park SH, Kim JR, Choi KG. The bonding durability of resin cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007. 32343–355.
16. Nakabayashi N. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int 1991. 22(2)73–74.
17. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2005. 32(2)128–133.
18. Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2006. 8(5)337–341.
19. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003. 19(8)725–731.
20. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994. 72(4)355–359.
21. Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent 2005. 7(1)33–40.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Schematic drawing of moulds

Table 1

Composition of materials used in this study

Table 1

GDPM ; Glycerol dimethacrylate dihydrogen phosphate

Bis-GMA ; 2,2 -bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacrylyloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane

TEGDMA ; Triethyleneglycol dimethacylate

UDMA ; Urethane dimethacrylate

Table 2

Handling methods of the resin cement

Table 2

Table 3

Physical properties of resin cements

Table 3

Groups with the same superscripts are not statistically significant.

Table 4

Shear bond strength of resin cements on dentin

Table 4

Groups with the same superscripts are not statistically significant.

Table 5

Shear bond strength of resin cements on ceramic

Table 5

Groups with the same superscripts are not statistically significant.