The Effect of Temporary Filling Materials on The Adhesion between Dentin Adhesive-coated Surface and Resin Inlay

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2008;33(6):553-559

Publication date (electronic) : 2008 November 30

doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.553

Tae-Gun Kim , Kwang-Won Lee , Mi-Kyung Yu

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Mi-Kyung Yu. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk university, 634-18, Keumam-dong, Chonju, 561-712, Korea. Tel: 82-63-250-2045, Fax: 82-63-250-2129, mkyou102@hanmail.net

Received 2008 September 10; Revised 2008 September 29; Accepted 2008 October 06.

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to compare the microtensile bond strength of resin coated surface and resin inlay according temporary filling materials prior to applying self-adhesive resin cement. Caviton(GC, Japan), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany) & petrolatum, and Eugenol-based cement, Tembond(Kerr, Orange CA, USA) were used as temporary filling materials. After fabrication of Tescera(Bisco, Schamburg IL, USA), it was bonded with a self-adhesive resin cement, Rely X unicem(3M, St. Paul. Minn, USA). After this procedure, the microtensile bond strength was measured and it was analyzed through one-way ANOVA and Duncan test(p<0.05).

Caviton(GC, Tokyo, Japan) showed statistical difference except for the control(group I) and the saliva(group II)(p<0.05). Provifil(group IV), Provifil & petroneum(group V), Tembond(group VI) had lower microtensile bond strength.

Keywords: Low-viscosity composite resin; Microtensile bond strength; Resin-coating surface; Caviton; Tembond; Provifil

References

1. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. I. Minimally intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations. J Adhes Dent 2001. 37–16.

2. Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Tagami J. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin-effect of bonding environment. Oper Dent 1996. 21196–202.

3. Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. The resin-coating technique. Effect of a single-step bonding system on dentin bond stregths. J Adhes Dent 2003. 5293–300.

4. Satoh M, Inai N, NIkaido T. How to use Liner Bond System as a dentin and pulp protector in indirect restorations. J Jpn Adhes Dent 1994. 1241–47.

5. Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2000. 1311197–1199.

6. Okuda M, Nikaido T, Maruoka R, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007. 1938–48.

7. Begazo CC, de Boer HD, Kleverlaan CJ, van Waas MA, Feilzer AJ. Shear bond strength of different types of luting cements to an aluminum oxide reinforced glass ceramic core material. Dent Mater 2004. 20(10)901–907.

8. Kurosaki N, Kubota M, Yamamoto Y, Fusayama T. The effect of etching on the dentin of the clinical cavity floor. Quintessence int 1990. 2187–92.

9. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Hickel , Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002. 18(3)269–275.

10. Kim DW, Park SJ, Choi KK. Compatibility of Self-etching Dentin Adhesives with Resin Luting Cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2005. 30(6)493–504.

11. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson C. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent 1996. 957–60.

12. Satoh M, Inai N, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. How to use Liner Bond System as a dentin and pulp protector in indirect restorations. J Jpn Adhes Dent 1994. 1241–47.

13. Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Tagamai J. The Resin-coating technique. J Adhes Dent 2003. 5293–300.

14. De Goes MF, Nikaido T, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Early bond strengths of dual-cured resin cement to resin-coated dentin. J Dent Res 2000. 79(special issue)453.

15. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. Dent Mater 2007. 23279–287.

16. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "Resin Coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003. 2828–35.

17. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004. May-Jun. 17(3)357–363.

18. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagamai J. Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2006. 8311–318.

19. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements of bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 1998. 2355–62.

20. Leirskar J, Nordbo H. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000. 16265–268.

21. al-Wazzan KA, al-Harbi AA, Hammand IA. The effect of eugenol containing temporary cement on the bond strength of two resin composite core materials to dentin. J Prosthodont 1997. 637–42.

22. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 2001. 26556–561.

23. Cho NY, Lee IB. Polymerization Shrinkage, Hygroscopic Expansion and Microleakage of Resin-based Temporary Filling Materials. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2008. 33(2)115–124.

Article information Continued

(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.