Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2008;33(6):499-506
Publication date (electronic) : 2008 November 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499
Hyun-A Lee, Young-Gon Cho
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-825, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@chosun.ac.kr
Received 2007 March 19; Revised 2008 August 27; Accepted 2008 August 27.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the push-out strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements. Newly extracted 36 human mandibular premolars which had single root canal were selected and their crown portions were removed. The root canal was instrumented using PROTAPER™ system and obturated using continuous wave technique. In each root, a 9-mm deep post space was prepared. #2 translucent fiber post (DT Light post, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.) was cemented using injection technique with Uni-dose needle tip (Bisco) and six different resin cements. The tested resin cements were Duo-Link (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.), Variolink II (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schann, Liechtenstein), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan), Multilink Automix (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schann, Liechtenstein), RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.), and Maxcem (Kerr Co., CA, U.S.A.). After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, each root was transversally sectioned into approximately 1-mm thick sections. This procedure resulted in 6 serial sections per root. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine (EZ Test, Shimadzu Co.) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (p=0.05).

The push-out strength of the groups which cemented fiber post with Panavia F and Multilink Automix were lower than those of the other groups. But, there were no statistically significant difference among groups at a probability level of 0.05.

Keywords: Fiber post; Resin cement; Root dentin; Push-out test; Injection technique

References

1. Sahafi A, Peutzfeidt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003. 5(2)153–162.
2. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observation. Dent Mater 2002. 18596–602.
3. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-codoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resion posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000. 13(Spec No)15B–18B.
4. Galhano GA, Valandro LF, De Meto RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod 2005. 31(3)209–211.
5. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod 2001. 27(12)758–761.
6. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998. 80(2)151–157.
7. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Mathias P, Muench A. Microtensile bond stength of light- and self-cored adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent 2005. 30(4)500–506.
8. Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Connor KN, Magill JPG, Maguire GR. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pullout test. Dent Mater 1994. 1088–89.
9. Goracci C, Sadeck FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhension of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005. 30(5)627–635.
10. Kallas M, Koss D, Hahn H, Hellmann J. Interfacial stress state present in a "thin-slice" fiber push-out test. J Mater Sci 1992. 27(14)3821–3826.
11. Valandro LF, Andreatta Filho OD, Valera MC, De Araujo MAM. The effect of adhesive system on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teeth. J Adhes Dent 2005. 7(4)331–336.
12. Cho YG, Cho GC. Marginal Microleakage of Self-etching Primer Adhesives and a Self-etching Adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002. 27493–501.
13. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin post. Int J Prosthodont 2003. 1639–44.
14. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent fiber post: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003. 16593–596.
15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Manson PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber post. Am J Dent 2000. 13Spec No. 9B–13B.
16. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papaccbini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005. 31(8)608–612.
17. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Geppi S. Influence of microbrush on efficacy of bonding into root canals. Am J Dent 2002. 15227–231.
18. Pirani C, Cberasoni S, Foscbi F, Piana G, Lousbine RJ, Tay FR, Prati C. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth? J Endod 2005. 31(12)891–894.
19. Fakiha Z, Al-Aujan A, Al-Shamrani S. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques. J Prosthodont 2001. 10(1)37–41.
20. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Kreijci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003. 19199–205.
21. Feilzer A, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composite for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993. 92–5.
22. Tay FR, Gwinnet AJ, Wei SHY. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995. 741168–1178.
23. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 1993. 24618–631.
24. Kim JW, Yoo MK, Lee SJ, Lee KW. Microtensile Bonding of Resin Fiber Reinforced Post to Radicular Dentin using Resin Cement. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003. 2880–87.
25. Kim DW, Park SJ, Choi KK. Compatibility of Self-etching Dentin Adhesives with Resin Luting Cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2005. 30493–504.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2008 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Device designed for push-out test and universal testing machine

Table 1

Resin cements tested in this study

Table 1

Table 2

Push-out strength for each group

Table 2