Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The remineralizing features of pH 5.5 solutions of different degree of saturations on artificially demineralized enamel


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

The remineralizing features of pH 5.5 solutions of different degree of saturations on artificially demineralized enamel

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2008;33(5):481-492
Publication date (electronic) : 2008 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.481
Young-Jun Kwak, Eui-seoug Kim, Sung-Ho Park, Hyung Kyu Gong, Yoon Lee, Chan-Young Lee
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Chan-Young Lee. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 134, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-8700, chanyoungl@yuhs.ac
Received 2008 August 12; Revised 2008 August 22; Accepted 2008 September 02.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to observe and compare the remineralization tendencies of artificially demineralized enamel by remineralization solutions of different degree of saturations at pH 5.5, using a polarizing microscope and computer programs (Photoshop, Image pro plus, Scion Image, Excel).

For this study, 36 sound permanent teeth with no signs of demineralization, cracks, or dental restorations were used. The specimens were immersed in lactic acid demineralization solution for 3 days in order to produce dental caries artificially that consist of surface and subsurface lesions. Each of 9 or 10 specimens was immersed in pH 5.5 lactic acid buffered remineralization solution of three different degrees of saturation (0.25, 0.30, 0.35) for 12 days. After the demineralization and remineralization, images were taken by a polarizing microscope (× 100). The results were obtained by observing images of the specimens, and using computer programs, the density of caries lesions were determined.

In conclusion, in the group with the lowest degree of saturation, remineralization occurred thoroughly from the surface to the subsurface lesion, whereas in the groups with greater degree of saturation showed no significant change in the subsurface lesion, although there was corresponding increase in the remineralization width on the surface zones.

Keywords: Demineralization; Remineralization; pH; Degree of saturation

References

1. Ingram GS, Silverstone LM. A chemical and histological study of artificial caries in human dental enamel in vitro. Caries Res 1981. 15393–398.
2. Shellis RP. Relationship between human enamel structure and the formation of caries-like lesions. Arch Oral Biol 1984. 29975–981.
3. Silverstone LM. Observation on the dark zone in early enamel caries and artificial like lesions. Caries Res 1967. 1260–274.
4. Brudevold F, McCann HG. Enamel solubility tests and their significance in regard to dental caries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1968. 15320–51.
5. Brown WE, Patel PR, Chow LC. Formation of CaHPO4·2H2O from enamel mineral and its relationship to caries formation. J Dent Res 1975. 54475–481.
6. Christoffersen J, Arends J. Progress of artificial lesion progression in enamel. Caries Res 1982. 16433–439.
7. Featherstone JDB, Duncan JF, Cutress TW. Surface layer phenomenon in vitro early caries-like lesions in human tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1978. 23397–404.
8. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. Chemistry of enamel subsurface demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 1974. 53226–235.
9. Englander HR, Carter WMJ. The formation of lactic acid in dental plaque(III). J Dent Res 1956. 35792–799.
10. Margolis HC, Moreno EC. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspect of enamel demineralization. Caries Res 1985. 1922–35.
11. Margolis HC, Moreno EC. Kinetics of hydroxyapatite dissolution. J Dent Res 1990. Abstr. #1546.
12. Margolis HC, Moreno EC, Murphy BJ. Development of caries like lesions in partially saturated lactate buffers. Caries Res 1985. 1936–45.
13. Gray JA. Kinetics of enamel dissolution during formation of incipient caries-like lesions. Arch Oral Biol 1966. 04. 11397–422.
14. Theuns HM, Van Dijk JWE, Groneveld A. Effect of time and degree of saturation of buffer solutions on artificial carious lesion formation in human tooth enamel. Caries Res 1983. 17503–512.
15. Kapur KK, Fischer EF, Manly RS. Influence of type of acid, pH, molarity, saturation in rate of enamel penetration. J Dent Res 1962. 41760–770.
16. Lee CY. Artificial Caries Formation in Acid Buffering Solution. Yonsei Dent J 1992. 734–41.
17. Silverstone LM, Wefer JS, Zimmerman BF, Clark BH, Featherstone MJ. Remineralization phenomena. Caries Res 1977. 1159–84.
18. ten Cate JM, Duijsters PPE. Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res 1982. 16201–210.
19. ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res 1981. 1560–69.
20. Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res 1977. 11277–286.
21. Han WS, Kum KY, Lee CY. The Influence of Fluoride on Remineralization of Artificial Dental Caries. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1996. 21161–173.
22. Feagin F, Patel PR, Koulourides T, Pigman W. Study of the effect Ca, P, F and hydrogen ion concentrations on the remineralization of partially demineralized human and bovine enamel surfaces. Arch Oral Biol 1971. 16535–548.
23. Featherstone JDB, Rodger BF. Effect of acetic, lactic and other organic acids on the formation of artificial caries lesion. Caries Res 1981. 15377–385.
24. Nikiforuk MJ. Environmental hypersensitivity living in a hostile world. Can Nurse 1985. 8142–46.
25. Margolis HC, Moreno EC, Murphy BJ. Effect of low levels of fluoride in solution on enamel demineralization. J Dent Res 1986. 6523–29.
26. Lammers PC, Borggreven JM, Driessens FC. Influence of fluoride and pH on in vitro remneralization of bovine enamel. Caries Res 1992. 268–13.
27. Park JW, Hur B, Lee CY. The Effects of the Degree of Saturation of Acidulated Buffer Solutions in Enamel and Dentin Remineralization and AFM Observation of Hydroxyapatite Crystals. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2000. 25459–473.
28. Kim MK, Kum KY, Lee CY. The Influence of pH on Remineralization of Artificial Dental Caries. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1997. 22193–208.
29. Kim SC, Lee CY. The Effect of the pH of Remineralized Buffer Solutions on Dentin Remineralizxation. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007. 32151–161.
30. Margolis HC, Zhang YP, Lee CY, Kent RL Jr, Moreno EC. Kinetics of enamel demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 1999. 781326–1335.
31. ten Cate JM. In vitro studies on the effects of F on de- and remineralization. J Dent Res 1990. 69614–619.
32. White DJ. The use of synthetic polymer gels for artificial carious lesion preparation. Caries Res 1987. 21228–242.
33. Featherstone JDB. Comparison of artificial caries like lesions by quantitative microradiography and microhardness profile. Caries Res 1983. 17385–391.
34. Arends J, Jongebloed W, Ogaard B, Rolla G. SEM and microradiographic investigation of initial enamel caries. Scand J Dent Res 1987. 95193–201.
35. Strang R, MacDonald I, Creanor SL, Stephen KW. Mineral content variations in demineralized enamel (abstract). Caries Res 1986. 20185.
36. Buskes JA, Christoffersen J, Arends J. Lesion formation and lesion remineralization in enamel under constant composition condition. Caries Res 1985. 19490–496.
37. Nancollas GH, Purdie N. The kinetics of crystal growth. Q Rev 1964. 181–20.
38. White DJ, Chen WC, Nancollas GH. Kinetic and physical aspects of enamel remineralization. Caries Res 1988. 2211–19.
39. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. Demineralization and remineralization of dental enamel. J Dent Res 1979. 58896–902.
40. Exterkate RAM, Damen JJM, ten Cate JM. A single-section model for enamel de- and remineralization studies. 1. The effects of different Ca/P ratios in remineralization solutions. J Dent Res 1993. 721599–1603.
41. ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. III. A study of the deposition mechanism. Caries Res 1980. 14351–358.
42. Park SH, Lee CY, Lee JS. The Effect of Acid Concentration and pH of Lactate Buffer Solution on the Progress of Artificial Caries Lesion in Human Tooth Enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1993. 18277–290.
43. Kum KY, Lee CY. The Effect of Four Kinds of Acid and Concentration on the Formation of Artificial Carious Lesion in Human Tooth Enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1996. 21470–488.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2008 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Specimen used in the experiment.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Polarizing microscopic observation of demineralized enamel (Group 1, × 100).

Figure 3

Figure 3

Polarizing microscopic observation of remineralized enamel (Group 1, × 100).

Figure 4

Figure 4

Polarizing microscopic observation of demineralized enamel (Group 2, × 100).

Figure 5

Figure 5

Polarizing microscopic observation of remineralized enamel (Group 2, × 100).

Figure 6

Figure 6

Polarizing microscopic observation of demineralized enamel (Group 3, × 100).

Figure 7

Figure 7

Polarizing microscopic observation of remineralized enamel (Group 3, × 100).

Figure 8

Figure 8

Change rate of demineralized depth (demineralized depth after remineralization / demineralized depth before remineralization) × 100 (%).

Figure 9

Figure 9

Change rate of surface lesion width (surface lesion width after remineralization / surface lesion width before remineralization) × 100 (%).

Figure 10

Figure 10

Comparison of density in enamel area before and after remineralization (Group 1).

Figure 11

Figure 11

Comparison of density in enamel area before and after remineralization (Group 2).

Figure 12

Figure 12

Comparison of density in enamel area before and after remineralization (Group 3).

Figure 13

Figure 13

Change rate of mineral density before and after remineralization ((demineralized area before remineralization - demineralized area after remineralization / demineralized area before remineralization) × 100 + 100 (%))

Table 1

Initial composition of demineralization solution

Table 1

Table 2

Initial composition of remineralization solution

Table 2

Table 3

One-way ANOVA on the remineralizing features of pH 5.5 solutions of different degree of saturations on artificially demineralized enamel

Table 3

*p < .05

Table 4

Quantitative value change (%) and the post-hoc result of enamel during de- and remineralization

Table 4

Standard Deviation (SD) is in the parentheses.

*p < .05