EFFECT OF THE ADDITIONAL ETCHING PROCEDURE ON PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF ONE-STEP RESIN CEMENT

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2008;33(5):443-451

Publication date (electronic) : 2008 January 14

doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.443

Soon-Il Kang , Jeong-Kil Park , Bock Hur , Hyeon-Cheol Kim ^,

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University

^*Corresponding Author: Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, 1-10, Ami-Dong, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea, Tel: 82-51-240-7978 E-mail: golddent@pusan.ac.kr

Received 2008 July 02; Revised 2008 August 04; Accepted 2008 August 12.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of additional etching procedure prior to Maxcem resin cement application in indirect restoration cementation using push-out bonding strength.

One hundred and two extracted human molars were used to make indirect resin restorations of gold inlay and Synfony. These restorations were cemented using Maxcem and Variolink II. Additional etching procedures were done for one group with Maxcem. Three groups have 17 specimens in both restoration types. Push-out bond strength was measured using multi-purpose tester and calculated for bonding strength per sqaure-millimeter area. The mean bonding strength values were compared using SPSS 12.0K program for one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's Test with 95% significance.

Under the condition of this study, the additional etching procedure prior to usage of Maxcem resulted in reduced bond strength for both of restoration types.

Keywords: Bonding strength; Push-out bond strength; One-step bonding; Resin cement; Acid etching; Maxcem

Figure 1.

Specimen design and dimension (mm) and prepared tooth specimen.

Figure 2.

Push-out bond strength measuring device.

Figure 3.

Representatives of SEM examination of failure surfaces of A; GMC, B; GME, C; GVL, D; RMC, E; RME, and F; RVL.

Table 1.

Bonding systems used in this study

Table 2.

Group classification and adhesive methods for each groups

Table 3.

Push-out bond strength (N/㎜²)

References

1. Kelsey WP, Triolo PT, Blankenau RJ, Kelsey MN, Chad O, Dan Hauser. Bond strength to enamel and dentin with indirect and direct resin composite. Am J Dent 9(3):105–108. 1996;

2. Gerard K. Direct and indirect adhesive restorative material: A review. Am J Dent 13:35–40. 2000;

3. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324–330. 2000;

4. Mark YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR. Pashley DH Micro-tensile bond strength of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 18:609–621. 2002;

5. Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schla¨pfer R, Ha¨mmerle C, Fischer J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 24(7):944–950. 2008;

6. Linlin H, Akira O, Masayoshi F, Takashi OI. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 26(6):906–914. 2007;

7. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion acrylic filling material to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34:846–851. 1955;

8. Hagger O. British patent no. 687 2991951;

9. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16(3):180–187. 2000;

10. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30(2-3):83–90. 2002;

11. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29:55–61. 2001;

12. 김 도완, 박 상진, 최 경규. 자가부식형 상아질 접착제와 레진 시 멘트와의 적합성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 30:493–504. 2005;

13. 조 민우, 박 상혁, 김 종률, 최 경규. 레진시멘트의 접착 내구성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 32:343–355. 2007;

14. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971. 2004;

15. Oliver F. Creating a reliable bond. An all-in-one system. Am J Dent 13:85–87. 2006;

16. Tseng WY, Chen MH, Lu HH, Lin CW, Hsieh TT, Chen CH, Lai JY, Lee BS. Tensile bond strength of Er, Cr: YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin to composite inlays with two resin cements. Dent Mater 6(5):746–55. 2007;

17. Saskalauskaite E, Tam LE, McComb D. Flexural Strength, Elastic Modulus, and pH Profile of Self-etch Resin Luting Cements. J Prosthodont Dec 14 [E pub] 2007;

18. Senyilmaz DP, Palin WM, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. The effect of surface preparation and luting agent on bond strength to a zirconium-based ceramic. Oper Dent 32(6):623–630. 2007;

19. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Mussig D. A comparative evaluation of bracket bonding with 1-, 2-, and 3-component adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132(2):144.e1–5. 2007;

20. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 24(2):185–191. 2008;

21. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 8(5):327–335. 2006;

22. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod 76(1):123–126. 2006;

23. Patierno JM, Rueggeberg FA, Anderson RW, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Push-out strength and SEM evaluation of resin composite bonded to internal cervical dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol 12:227–236. 1996;

24. House K, Sheriff M. An in-vitro investigation into the use of a single component self-etching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a pilot study. J Orthod 33:116–124. 2006;

25. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Oberschachtsiek H, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaption after NaOCl pre-treatment. Oper Dent 25:40–45. 2000;

26. Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 22:194–199. 1997;

27. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 12:277–282. 1999;

28. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 11:234–238. 1995;

29. Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent 26:44–47. 2001;

30. Ai H, Nagai M. Effect of the adhesive layer thickness on the fracture toughness of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 19(2):153–163. 2000;

31. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microten-sile bond strength. Oper Dent 26(1):97–104. 2001;

32. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 27(9):619–625. 1996;

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.