Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Color stability of the resin cements with accelerated aging

Color stability of the resin cements with accelerated aging

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2008;33(4):389-396
Publication date (electronic) : 2008 July 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.4.389
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: In-Nam Hwang. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, 5 Hak-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-4443, Fax: 82-62-225-8387, hinso@jnu.ac.kr
Received 2008 April 24; Revised 2008 June 23; Accepted 2008 July 02.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the color stability of resin cements with accelerated test. Four dual curing resin cements: Panavia-F (KURARAY), Duolink (BISCO), Variolink-II (Ivoclar Vivadent), and RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) and 1 self curing resin cement: Resiment CE (j. l. Blosser) were used in this study. In control group, Gradia Anterior (GC) composite resin and Tescera Dentin (Bisco) indirect composite were used. Ten disk shape specimens were made from each resin cement. The specimens were subjected to an accelerated aging process in a refrigerated bath circulator at 60℃ for 15 and 30 days. Spectrophotometric analyses were made before and after 15 days and 30 days of accelerated aging time.

The color characteristics (L*, a*, b*) and the color difference (ΔE*) of the specimens before and after immersion were measured and computed.

Regardless of type of the resin cements, L* value was decreased and a* value was increased, but there were no significant difference. But b* value was increased significantly (p < 0.05). Tescera inlay showed least color change (p < 0.05), but Gradia showed notable color change after 15 days.

After 30 days on accelerated aging, ΔE* value was increased (Panavia-F < Variolink-II < Resiment CE < Duolink < Unicem) (p < 0.05), but there were no significant difference among Panavia-F, Variolink-II, and Resiment CE groups. After 30 days of accelerated aging, ΔE* value of all resin cements were greater than 3.0 and could be perceived by the human eye.

References

1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998. 80280–301.
2. Bowen RL, Argenitar H. Amine accelerators for methacrylate resin systems. J Dent Res 1971. 50923–928.
3. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1983. 4111–18.
4. Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int 1991. 22377–386.
5. Hekimoğlu C, Anil N, Etikan I. Effect of Accelerated Aging on the Color Stability of Cemented Laminate Veneers. Int J Prosthodont 2000. 1329–33.
6. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R. Tooth-Colored Filling Materials for the Restoration of Cervical Lesions: A 24-Month Follow-Up Study. Oper Dent 2000. 25251–258.
7. Iazzetti G, Burgess JO, Gardiner D, Ripps A. Color stability of Fluoride-Containing Restorative Materials. Oper Dent 2000. 25520–525.
8. Seghi RR, Gritz MD, Kim J. Colorimetric changes in composites resulting from visible light initiated polymerization. Dent Mater 1990. 6133–137.
9. Satou N, Khan AM, Matsumae I, Satou J, Shintani H. In vitro color change of composite resins. Dent Mater 1989. 5384–389.
10. Asmussen E. An accelerated test for color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1981. 39329–332.
11. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen PA. Color stability of three composite resins in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res 1990. 98257–260.
12. Gross MD, Moser JB. A colorimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1977. 4311–322.
13. Wozniak WT, Muller TP, Silverman R, Moser JB. Photographic assessment of color changes in cold and heat-cure resins. J Oral Rehabil 1981. 8333–339.
14. Noie F, O Keefe KL, Powers JM. Color stability of resin cements after accelerated aging. Int J Prosthodont 1995. 851–55.
15. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Schwartz IS. Color stability of selected dual-cured composite resin cement. J Prosthodont 1993. 224–27.
16. Setz J, Engel E. In vivo color stability of resin-veneered telescopic dentures: A double blind pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1997. 77486–491.
17. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: An in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994. 10353–362.
18. Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Color Stability of Compomer after Immersion in Various Media. J Esthet Dent 2000. 12258–263.
19. Eliades T, Gioka C, Heim M, Eliades G, Makou M. Color stability of Orthodontic adhesive resins. Angle Orthod 2004. 74391–393.
20. Koishi Y, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Influence of visible-light exposure on colour stability of current dual-curable luting composites. J Oral Rehabil 2002. 29387–393.
21. Duke ES, Trevino DF. A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1998. 7713–16.
22. Douglas RD. Color stability of new-generation indirect resins for prosthodontic application. J Prosthet Dent 2000. 83166–170.
23. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998. 80280–301.
24. Eldiwany M, Friedl KH, Powers JM. Color stability of light-cured and post cured composites. Am J Dent 1995. 8179–181.
25. Hwang IN, Oh WM. An Accelerated Test for Color Stability and Opacity Change of Light Curing Composite Resins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1993. 18215–226.
26. Bergman B, Marklund S, Nilson H, Hendlund SO. An intraindividual clinical comparison of 2 metal-ceramic systems. Int J Prosthodont 1999. 12444–447.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Change of L* Value after accelerating test.

Figure 2

Change of a* Value after accelerating test.

Figure 3

Change of b* value after accelerating test.

Figure 4

Total color difference (ΔE*). Bar means statistically significant difference between 15days and 30days (p < 0.05)

Table 1

Resin cement systems used in study

Table 1

All informations were provided from manufacturers. Bis-GMA : bis-phenol-A-diglycidyl methacrylate, UDMA : urethane dimethacrylate, TEGDMA : triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate, MDP : methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate

Table 2

Results of color change of resin cements, direct composite resin and indirect composite resin before and after accelerating test

Table 2

TE : Tescera Dentin, GR : Gradia, Standard deviations are in parentheses.

Table 3

Total color difference (ΔE*) of tested resin cement, direct composite, indirect composite after 15days and 30days

Table 3