Microleakage of resilon by methacrylate-based sealer and self-adhesive resin cement

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2008;33(3):204-212
Publication date (electronic) : 2008 May 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.3.204
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Korea.
2Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Medicine, A-jou University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Se-Hee Park. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, 123, Jibyeon-dong, Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do 210-320, Korea. Tel: 82-33-640-2760, drendo@kangnung.ac.kr
Received 2008 April 01; Revised 2008 April 24; Accepted 2008 April 25.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the apical microleakage in root canal filled with Resilon by methacrylate-based root canal sealer or 2 different self-adhesive resin cements. Seventy single-rooted extracted human teeth were sectioned at the CEJ perpendicular to the long axis of the roots with diamond disk. Canal preparation was performed with crown-down technique using Profile NiTi rotary instruments and GG drill. Each canal was prepared to ISO size 40, .04 taper and 1 mm short from the apex. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups of 15 roots each and 5 roots each for positive and negative control group. The root canals were filled by lateral condensation as follows. Group 1: Guttapercha with AH-26, Group 2: Resilon with RealSeal primer & sealer, Group 3: Resilon with Rely-X Unicem, Group 4: Resilon with BisCem. After stored in 37℃, 100% humidity chamber for 7 days, the roots were coated with 2 layers of nail varnish except apical 3 mm. The roots were then immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 7 days. Apical microleakage was measured by a maximum length of linear dye penetration after roots were separated longitudinally. One way ANOVA and Scheffe's post-hoc test were performed for statistical analysis. Group 1 showed the least apical leakage and there was no statistical significance between Group 2, 3, 4. According to the results, the self adhesive resin cement is possible to use as sealer instead of primer & sealant when root canal filled by Resilon.

References

1. Figdor D. Apical periodontitis: a very prevalent problem. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002. 94651–652.
crossref crossref
2. Hovland EJ, Dumsha YC. Leakage evaluation in vitro of the root canal sealer Sealapex. Int Endod J 1985. 18179–182.
crossref
3. Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson J, Leinfelder KF, Trope M. Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004. 16348–354.
crossref crossref
4. Shipper G, Ørstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 2004. 30342–347.
crossref crossref
5. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: A Hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007. 33391–398.
crossref crossref crossref
6. Technical data sheet: Rely X Unicem 2007. St Paul, USA: 3M ESPE;
7. Shin SJ, Lee Y, Park JW. Evaluation of retrievability using a new soft resin based root canal filling material. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006. 31(4)323–329.
crossref
8. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive lutimg materials to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004. 20963–971.
crossref
9. McMichen FR, Pearson G, Rahbaran S, Gulabivala K. A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2003. 36629–635.
crossref
10. Starkey DL, Anderson RW, Pashly DH. An evaluation of the effects of methylene blue dye pH on apical leakage. J Endod 1993. 19435–439.
crossref
11. Choi JJ, Hong CU. The Effect of Microseal Obturation Technique on the Apical Seal of Root Canals. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1999. 24(2)356–363.
12. Haikel Y, Wittenmeyer W, Bateman G, Bentaleb A, Allemann C. A new method for the quantitative analysis of endodontic microleakage. J Endod 1999. 25172–177.
crossref crossref
13. Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, Mackenzie D. An assessment of microbial coronal leakage in teeth root filled with gutta percha and three different sealers. Int Endod J 1996. 29387–392.
crossref
14. Jacquot BM, Panighi MM, Steinmetz P, G'Sell C. Evaluation of temporary restorations by means of electrochemical impedance measurements. J Endod 1996. 22586–589.
crossref
15. Camps J, Pashley DH. Reliability of the dye penetration studies. J Endod 2003. 29592–594.
crossref crossref
16. Hwang HK, Park SH, Lee YJ. Comparative study on the apical sealing ability according to the obturation techniques. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002. 27(3)290–297.
crossref
17. Ahlberg KM, Assavanop P, Tay FR. A comparison of the apical dye penetration patterns shown by methylene blue and india ink in root-filled teeth. Int Endod J 1995. 2830–34.
crossref
18. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Lai CNS, Raina R, Williams MC. Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2005. 31514–519.
crossref crossref
19. Silveira FF, Soares JA, Nunes E, Mordente VL. Negative influence of continuous wave technique on apical sealing of the root canal system with Resilon. J Oral Sci 2007. 49121–128.
crossref crossref
20. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995. 2018–25.
crossref
21. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 2003. 69726–731.
crossref
22. Yiu CK, King NM, Carrilho MR. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and temperature on water sorption of dental adhesive resins. Biomaterials 2006. 271695–1703.
crossref crossref
23. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003. 24655–665.
crossref crossref
24. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987. 661636–1639.
crossref crossref crossref
25. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003. 19199–205.
crossref
26. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals - a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005. 31584–589.
crossref crossref
27. Raina R, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Evaluation of the quality of the apical seal in Resilon/Epiphany and Gutta-percha/AH Plus-filled root canals by using a fluid filtration approach. J Endod 2007. 33944–947.
crossref crossref
28. Technical data sheet Irving Park Rd., USA: BisCem Bisco Inc;

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the microleakage test.

Figure 2

Representative photograph of Gutta-percha + AH-26 group.

Figure 3

Representative photograph of RealSeal + RealSeal primer & sealer group.

Figure 4

Representative photograph of RealSeal + Rely-X Unicem group.

Figure 5

Representative photograph of RealSeal + Biscem group.

Table 1

Experimental materials used in this study

Table 1

Table 2

Experimental groups according to the root canal filling materials

Table 2

Table 3

Amounts of apical microleakage

Table 3

Table 4

Comparison between experimental groups of Apical microleakage

Table 4

*:significance at the level of p < 0.05