Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Effect of a new resin monomer on the microleakage of composite resin restorations


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Effect of a new resin monomer on the microleakage of composite resin restorations

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2007;32(5):469-475
Publication date (electronic) : 2007 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.5.469
JH Bae1, YK Kim2, PY Yoon2, MA Lee3, BH Cho3,4
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea.
2Department of Oral Maxilofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea.
3Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea.
4Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Byeong-Hoon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongro-gu Seoul, 110-749, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2072-3514, Fax: 82-2-764-3514, chobh@snu.ac.kr
Received 2007 July 11; Revised 2007 July 25; Accepted 2007 August 11.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new resin monomer on the microleakage of composite resin restorations. By adding new methoxylated Bis-GMA (Bis-M-GMA, 2,2-bis[4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane) having low viscosity, the content of TEGDMA which has adverse effects on polymerization shrinkage might be decreased. As a result, microleakage might be improved.

2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm cavities with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 40 extracted human premolars. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into four groups and restored with Clearfil SE bond (Kuraray, Japan) and one of experimental composite resins; EX1, Experimental composite resin1 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers); EX2, Experimental composite resin2 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 20 nm nanofillers); EX3, Experimental composite resin3 (Bis-GMA/TEGDMA = 70/30 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers); and Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE, USA) was filled as a control group. The restored teeth were thermocycled, and immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The teeth were sectioned buccolingually with a low speed diamond saw and evaluated for microleakage under stereomicroscope. The data were statistically analyzed by Pearson Chi-Square test and Fisher Exact test (p = 0.05).

The microleakage scores seen at the enamel margin were significantly lower than those of dentin margin (p = 0.007). There were no significant differences among the composite resins in the microleakage scores within each margin (p > 0.05). Bis-M-GMA, a new resin monomer having low viscosity, might in part replace high viscous Bis-GMA and might improve the quality of composite resin.

Keywords: Microleakage; New resin monomer; Bis-M-GMA; Viscosity; Polymerization shrinkage

Notes

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea (Grant No. 03-PJ1-PG1-CH09-0001).

References

1. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1965. 44895–902.
2. Wieczkowski G, Joynt RB, Davis EL, Yu XY, Cleary K. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer based resin restorations. Oper Dent 1992. 1721–25.
3. Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Um CM. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002. 27297–304.
4. Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quqntititive evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002. 27475–479.
5. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997. 22173–185.
6. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972. 841349–1357.
7. Hannig M, Fu B. Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of class V restoration bonded with self etching primers. J Adhes Dent 2001. 3265–272.
8. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restorations. J Dent 1997. 25435–440.
9. Thompson VP, Williams EF, Bailey WJ. Dental resins with reduced shrinkage during hardening. J Dent Res 1979. 581522–1532.
10. Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of new oxaspiro monomers for doulble ring-opening polymerization. J Dent Res 1992. 711408–1412.
11. Moon EJ, Lee JY, Kim CK, Cho BH. Dental restorative composites containing 2,2-bis-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane derivatives and spiro orthocarbonates. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005. 73338–346.
12. Kalachandra S, Sankarapandian M, Shobha HK, Taylor DF, McGrath JE. Influence of hydrogen bonding on properties of Bis-GMA analogs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997. 8283–286.
13. Kim Y, Kim CK, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Kim OY. A new resin matrix for dental composite having low volumetric shrinkage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004. 7082–90.
14. Kim JW, Kim LU, Kim CK, Cho BH, Kim OY. Characteristics of novel dental composites containing 2,2-bis[4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloxy-propoxy) phenyl] propane as a base resin. Biomacromolecules 2006. 7154–160.
15. Kim LU, Kim JW, Kim CH. Effect of molecular structure of the resins on the volumetric shrinkage and the mechanical strength of dental restorative composites. Biomacromolecules 2006. 72680–2687.
16. Prakki A, Tallury P, Mondelli RFL. Influence of additives on the properties of Bis-GMA/Bis-GMA analog comonomers and corresponding copolymers. Dent Mater 2007. (E-pub ahead of print).
17. Anseth KS, Newman SM, Bowman CN. Polymeric dental composites: properties and reaction behavior of multimethacrylate dental restorations. Adv Polym Sci 1995. 122177–217.
18. Braden M. The formulation of composite filling materials. Oper Dent 1978. 397–102.
19. Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater 2005. 21354–364.
20. Sakaguchi RL, Peters MCRB, Nelson SR, Douglas WH, Poort HW. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent 1992. 20178–182.
21. Bausch JR, Lange KD, Davidson CL, Peters A, de Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982. 4859–67.
22. Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 1983. 28156–161.
23. Kim JJ, Moon HJ, Lim BS, Lee YK, Rhee SH, Yang HC. The effect of nanofiller on the opacity of experimental composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007. 80332–338.
24. Kim IS, Min KS, Shin DH. Microleakage of various composite resin systems. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003. 28127–133.
25. Kang SH, Kim OY, Oh MH, Cho BH, Um CM, Kwon HC, Son HH. Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002. 27142–149.
26. Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, ThomsonVP , Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class 5 composite restorations: A comparision. Oper Dent 1994. 19133–137.
27. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJM, Saiku JM, Pelzner RB. Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material tested in vitro above and below the cementaoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 1986. 1711–15.
28. Fayyad MA, Shortall AC. Microleakage of dentin-bonded posterior composite restoration. J Dent 1987. 1567–72.
29. Lee IB, Lee JH, Cho BH, Son HH, Lee ST, Um CM. Rheological properties of resin composites according to the change of monomer and filler compositions. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004. 29520–531.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2007 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Figure 1

A specimen of EX1 showed score 0 at enamel margin and dentin margin.

Figure 2

Figure 2

A Specimen of EX2 showed score 0 at enamel margin and score 2 at dentin margin.

Figure 3

Figure 3

A specimen of EX3 showed score 0 at enamel margin and score 3 at dentin margin.

Table 1

The composition of experimental composite resins (Unit: wt%)

Table 1

The numbers were percentage of the composition within each experimental resin.

Table 2

Number of specimens showing microleakage scores at enamel and dentin margins of cervical box cavities filled with composite resins bonded with an adhesive system (n = 20, unit: N(%))

Table 2

The numbers in the parentheses were percentage of the specimens within the group restored with the same composite resin and same position.

§p values by Fisher's Exact test

†Proportion of microleakage score in enamel margin was significantly different from that in dentin margin (p = 0.007).