The effect of environment on the physical properties of core materials

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2005;30(2):86-94

Publication date (electronic) : 2005 March 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.2.086

Yoo-Sook Hwang ¹, Kyoung-Kyu Choi ¹^,², Sang-Jin Park ¹^,²

¹Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyunghee University, Korea.

²Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Kyunghee University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Sang-Jin Park. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate school of KyungHee University, 1, Hoegi Dong, Dongdaemoon Gu, Seoul, Korea, 130-702. Tel: 82-2-958-9335, psangjin@khu.ac.kr

Received 2004 July 01; Revised 2004 August 18; Accepted 2004 October 09.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the flexural strength and hardness of four core materials in 4 different medias and to evaluate the relationship between the physical properties.

For the flexural strength, the specimens were prepared from each of the following materials: Bisfil Core, Core Max, Fuji IX GP, Miracle Mix and randomly divided into four groups and stored at 37 degree C in the following medias: distilled water for 24 hours (DW/1), distilled water for 30 days (DW/30). 2% NaF for 30 days (NF/30), 0.02N lactic acid for 30 days (LA/30). After storage, the specimens were subjected to flexural strength testing and calculated to flexural modulus.

For hardness testing, specimens were prepared from four materials and storaged in the uniform way. After storage, the specimens were subjected to Vicker's hardness testing.

1. The flexural strength of Core Max were the highest, and the flexural strength of Miracle Mix were the lowest.

2. The hardness of Bisfil Core were the highest.

3. The hardness of Core Max were the highest.

4. The hardness of Miracle Mix were the lowest.

5. 2% NaF and 0.02N lactic acid negatively affected the flexural strength and hardness of four core materials.

Keywords: Mechanical properties; Core materials; Flexural strength; Hardness

References

1. Combe EC, Shaglouf A-MS, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Mechanical properties of Direct core materials. Dent Mater 1999. 15158–165.

2. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of Water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999. 1571–78.

3. Saygili G, Mahmali SM. Comparative study of the physical properties of Core materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002. 22(4)355–363.

4. Yap AU, Cheang PH, Chay PL. Mechanical properties of two restorative Reinforced glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2002. 29682–688.

5. Bourke AW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Light-activated glass polyalkenoate Cements; the setting reaction. J Dent 1992. 20(2)115–120.

6. Attar N, Onen A. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002. 29(8)791–798.

7. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass Ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972. 132133–135.

8. Kerby RE, Knobloch L. Strength characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. Oper Dent 1992. 17170–174.

9. McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1988. 164293–300.

10. MaLean JW, Gasser O. Glass-cemet cements. Quintessence Int 1985. 16(5)333–343.

11. McLean JW. Cermet cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1990. 120(1)43–47.

12. Kerby RE, Bleiholder RF. Physical properties of stainless-steel and Silver-reinforced glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1991. 70(10)1358–1361.

13. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment(ART); a Three-year community field trial in Thailand-Survival of one-surface Restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1991. 56141–145.

14. Levartovsky S, Kuyinu E, Georgescu M, Goldstein GR. A comparison of the Diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive Strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced Glassionomer material. J Prosthet Dent 1994. 72(5)481–485.

15. Cohen BI, Volovich Y, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials. Gen Dent 2001. 49(5)484–488.

16. Roulet JF, Walti C. Influence of oral fluid on composite resins and glass Ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1984. 52182–186.

17. Yap AU, Tan SH, Wee SS, Lee CW, Lim EL, Zeng KY. Chemical degradation of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2001. 28(11)1015–1021.

18. Nicholson JW, Millar BJ, Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H. Storage of polyacid-modified resin composites in lactic acid solution. Dent Mater 1999. 15413–416.

19. Hotta M, Hirukawa H, Aono M. The effect of glaze on restorative glass-ionomer cements: evaluation of environmental durability in lactic acid solution. J Oral Rehabil 1995. 22(9)685–689.

20. Yaffe A, Zalkind M. The effect of topical application of fluorides on composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1981. 4559–62.

21. De Witte AM, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM. Surface roughening of glass ionomer cements by neutral NaF solutions. Biomaterials 2003. 24(11)1995–2000.

22. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of Adhesive Thickness on Polymerization contraction stress of Composite. J Dent Res 2000. 79(3)812–817.

23. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass iomers. Dent Mater 1994. 1078–82.

24. Miyazaki M, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of surface coatings on flexural properties of glass iononomers. Eur J Oral Sci 1996. 104600–604.

25. Kula K, McKinney JE, Kula TJ. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin composite degradation and wear. Dent Mater 1997. 13305–311.

26. Bowen RJ, Cleek GW. A new series of X-ray-opaque reinforcing fillers for composite materials. J Dent Res 1972. 51177–182.

27. Hadley PC, Billington RW, Pearson GJ, Williams JA. Effect of monovalent Ions in glass ionomer cements on their ineraction with sodium fluoride solution. Biomaterials 2000. 21(1)97–102.

28. Billington RW, Hadley PC, Towler MR, Pearson GJ, Williams JA. Effects of adding sodium and fluoride ions to glass ionomer on its interactions with sodium fluoride solution. Biomaterials 2000. 21(4)377–383.

29. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. Effect of storage media upon the surface micromorphology of resin-based restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002. 29(9)864–871.

30. Yap AU, Chew CL, Ong LF, Tech SH. Environmental damage and occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2002. 29(1)87–97.

31. Mckinney J, Wu W. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 1985. 64(11)1326–1331.

32. Yap AU, Teo JC, Teoh SH. Comparative wear resistance of reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001. 26(4)343–348.

33. Sarkar NK. Metal-matrix interface in reinforced glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1999. 15(6)421–425.

Article information Continued

(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.