Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Compatibility of self-etching dentin adhesives with resin luting cements


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Compatibility of self-etching dentin adhesives with resin luting cements

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2005;30(6):493-504
Publication date (electronic) : 2005 November 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.493
Do-Wan Kim, Sang-Jin Park, Kyoung-Kyu Choi
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Kyoung-Kyu Choi. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 1, Hoegi Dong, Dongdaemun Gu, Seoul, Korea, 130-702. Tel: 82-2-958-9337, choikkyu@khu.ac.kr
Received 2005 August 09; Revised 2005 October 06; Accepted 2005 October 20.

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the compatibility between 4 dentin adhesives and 4 resin luting cements.

Dentin adhesives used in this study were All-Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), Prompt L-Pop (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Resin luting cements used in this study were Choice (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), RelyX ARC (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), Bistite II DC (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Combination of each dentin adhesive and corresponding resin cement was made to 16 experimental groups.

Flat dentin surfaces was created on mid-coronal dentin of extracted mandibular third molars, then dentin surface was polished with 320-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers.

Indirect resin composite block (Tescera, Bisco) was fabricated. Its surface for bonding to tooth was polished with silicon carbide abrasive papers. Each dentin adhesive was treated on tooth surface and resin composite overlay were luted with each resin cement. Each bonded specimen was poured in epoxy resin and sectioned occluso-gingivally into 1.0 mm thick slab, then further sectioned into 1.0 × 1.0 mm2 composite-dentin beams. Microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison tests.

The results of this study were as follows;

2-step self-etching dentin adhesive which has additional bonding resin is more compatible than 1-step self-etching dentin adhesive.

Keywords: Compatibility; Self-etching dentin adhesives; Resin luting cements; Microtensile bond strength; Indirect resin composite block; Dentin

References

1. Manhart J, Scheibenhogen FA, Chen HY, Hiekel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2000. 4192–198.
2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain Veneers; a review of the literature. J Dent 2000. 28163–177.
3. Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coveraged crowns. Dent Mater 2000. 16198–206.
4. Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001. 11943–53.
5. el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design : an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2000. 13425–431.
6. Platt JA. Resin cements into the 21st century. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999. 201173–1184.
7. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999. 81135–141.
8. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002. 33213–224.
9. Choi KK, Kim SW, Choi HY. Effect of filler addition to bonding agents on the physical properties and the bond strength to bovine teeth. The First International Congress on Adhesive Dentistry(IAD, Program and Abstracts) 2002. –434.
10. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004. 3255–65.
11. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000. 131Suppl. 20S–25S.
12. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microntensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000. 16180–187.
13. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 1998. 23185–194.
14. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultra-structural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layers thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000. 283–98.
15. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2001. 3207–225.
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002. 30371–382.
17. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 2003. 28747–755.
18. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000. 1360D–76D.
19. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991. 66187–192.
20. el-Badrawy WA, el-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995. 73515–524.
21. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990. 63295–300.
22. Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil 2000. 27103–110.
23. Hahn P, Attin T, Grofke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2001. 17191–196.
24. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Mathews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 1994. 731205–1211.
25. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999. 78699–705.
26. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003. 5267–282.
27. Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface energy of dentin. Dent Mater 1994. 10259–264.
28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001. 17296–308.
29. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 2001. 17542–556.
30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003. 166–12.
31. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003. 527–40.
32. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003. 591–105.
33. Tanaka J, Ishikawa K, Yatani H, Yamashita A, Suzuki K. Correlation of dentin bond durability with water asorption of bonding layer. Dent Mater J 1999. 1811–18.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2005 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Schematic representation of micro-tensile bond strength test.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Micro-tensile bond strengths with CH resin cement.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Micro-tensile bond strengths with PA resin cement.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Micro-tensile bond strengths with RE resin cement.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Micro-tensile bond strengths with BI resin cement.

Figure 6

Figure 6

Micro-tensile bond strengths of each dentin adhesive coupled with four resin cements.

Figure 7

Figure 7

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of CH-AB. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

Figure 8

Figure 8

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of BI-AB. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

Figure 9

Figure 9

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of PA-SE. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

Figure 10

Figure 10

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of RE-SE. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

Figure 11

Figure 11

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of PA-PL. Hybrid layer is relatively thin, resin tags are rare and short.

Figure 12

Figure 12

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of RE-PL. Hybrid layer is formed limitedly and resin tags are rare.

Figure 13

Figure 13

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of CH-OU. Resin tags are poorly formed.

Figure 14

Figure 14

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of BI-OU. Few resin tags are observed.

Table 1

Dentin adhesives used in this study

Table 1

Table 2

Resin cements used in this study

Table 2

Table 3

Experimental Groups

Table 3

Table 4

Instruction for dentin adhesive systems

Table 4

Table 5

Instruction for resin cements

Table 5

Table 6

Micro-tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives with resin luting cements (Mean stength ± SD MPa)

Table 6

Groups with the same superscripts are not statistically significant (p = 0.05).