Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The influence of the degree of saturation of acidulated buffer solutions in the root dentin demineralization

The influence of the degree of saturation of acidulated buffer solutions in the root dentin demineralization

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(5):454-461
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.5.454
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.
Corresponding author: Chan-Young Lee. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Sinchon-dong 134, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, 120-752. Tel: 82-2-361-8700, chanyoungl@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and to evaluate the effects of the degree of saturation on the progression of artificial root caries lesion.

A total of 8 human premolars without any defects and cracks selected and the cementum were removed and the teeth were cleaned with ultrasonic device and pumice without fluoride.

Each tooth was sectioned into 6 pieces and they were ground with #800 sandpaper until they had a thickness of 200µm. Specimens were applied with nail vanish except for the 2-3 mm window area after application of bonding agent. Under the constant pH, the specimens were divided into 6 groups (degree of saturation; 0.1415, 0.1503, 0.1597, 0.1676, 0.1771, 0.1977). Each group was immersed in acid buffer solution for 1, 2, 3, 5 days under controlled temperature (25℃) and imbibed in water and examined using the polarizing microscope.

The results were as follows

1. Although the degree of saturation of demineralization solution decreased, the depth of penetration in the dentin was constant.

2. Erosion was observed on the surface of all the teeth in the group I, II. In the group III, IV, V, surfaces were not changed. The teeth in the group VI showed the more mineralized surface but not the shape of the dentinal tubules distinctively.

3. In all groups, the lesion progressed rapidly at the first day of the experiment, but increased gradually as time elapsed.

References

1. Christensen GJ. A new challenge-root caries in mature people. J Am Dent Assoc 1996. 127379–380.
2. Shay K. Root caries in the older patient. Dent Clin North Am 1997. 41763–793.
3. Katz RV, Hazen SP, Chilton NW, Mumma RD. Prevalence and intraoral distribution of root caries in an adult population. Caries Res 1982. 16265–271.
4. Joshi A, Papas AS, Giunta J. Root caries incidence and associated risk factors in middle-aged and older adults. Gerodontology 1993. 1083–89.
5. Hazen SP, Chilton NW, Mumma RD JR. The problem of root caries I; Literature review and clinical description. JADA 1973. 86137–144.
6. Banting DW, Ellen RP, Fillery ED. Prevalence of root caries among institutionalized older persons. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980. 884–88.
7. Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR. The art and science of oerative dentistry 1995. 3rd Edth ed. St Louis: Mosby; 60–128.
8. Wefel JS, Heilman JR, Jordan TH. Comparisons of in vitro root caries models. Caries Res 1995. 29204–209.
9. Nyvad B, ten Cate JM, Fejerskov O. Microradiography of experimental rot surface caries in man. Caries Res 1989. 23218–224.
10. Clarkson BH, Wefel JS, Mille I. A model for producing caries-like lesions in enamel and dentin using oral bacteria in vitro. J Dent Res 1984. 631186–1189.
11. Clarkson BH, Krell D, Wefel JS, Crall J, Feagin FF. In vitro caries-like lesion produced by Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus using sucrose and starch. J Dent Res 1987. 66795–798.
12. Phankosol P, Ettinger RL, Hicks MJ, Wefel JS. Histopathology of the initial lesion of the root surface; an in vitro study. J Dent Res 1985. 64(5)804–809.
13. Phankosol P, Ettinge RL, Hicks MJ, Wefel JS. Depth of penetration of in vitro root surface lesions. J Dent Res 1985. 64(6)897–899.
14. Hoppenbrouwers PM, Driessens FCM, Borggreven JMPM. The mineral solubility of human dentin roots. Arch Oral Biol 1987. 32(5)319–322.
15. Hamilton WJ Jr, Judd G, Ansell GS. Ultrastructure of human enamel specimens prepared by ion micromilling. J Dent Res 1973. 52703–710.
16. Dibdin GH. Surface areas of dental enamel ; comparision of experimental values with values calculated for its structural components. J Den Res 1972. 511254–1257.
17. Hoppenbrouwers PM, Driessens FC, Borggreven JM. The vulnerability of unexposed human dentin root to demineralization. J Dent Res 1986. 65(7)955–958.
18. Katz S, Park KK, Palenik CJ. In vitro root surface caries studies. J Oral Med 1987. 42(1)40–48.
19. Patel MV, Fox JL, Higuchi WI. The effect of acid type on kinetics and mechanism of dental enamel demineralization. J Dent Res 1987. 661425–1430.
20. Margolis HC, Moreno EC. Physiochemical perspectives on the cariostatic mechanisms of systemic and topical fluoride. J Dent Res 1990. 69606–613.
21. Margolis HC, Moreno EC. Kinetics of hydroxyapatite dissolution. J Dent Res 1990. Abstr #1546.
22. Furseth R, Johansen E. The mineral phase of sound and carious human dental cementum studied by electron microscopy. Acta Odontol Scand 1970. 28305–322.
23. Oh HS, Kum KY, Ro BD, Lee CY. The influence of pH on the formation of artificial root caries in acid buffer solution. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1999. 24495–502.
24. Kum KY, Lee CY. The effect of four kinds of acid and concentration on the formation of artificial carious lesion in human tooth enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1996. 21470–488.
25. Lee CY. Artificial caries formation in acid buffering solution. Yonsei Dent J 1992. 734–41.
26. Marshall GW Jr, Balooch M, Tench RJ, Kinney JH, Marshall SJ. Atomic force microscopy of acid effects on dentin. Dent Mater 1993. 9265–268.
27. Arends J, Jongeblooed W, Ogaard B, Rolla G. SEM and microradiographic investigation of initial enamel caries. Scand J Dent Res 1987. 95193–201.
28. Warshawsky H, Nancy A. Stereo electron microscopy of enamel crystallites. J Dent Res 1982. Spec No1504–1514.
29. Moreno EC, Zahrandnik RT. Chemistry of enamel subsurface demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 1974. 53(2)226–235.
30. Groeneveld A, Jongebloed W, Arends J. The mineral content of decalcified surface enamel. A combined microprobe-quantitative microradiography study. Caries Res 1974. 8(3)267–274.
31. Wefel JS, Clarkson BH, Heilman JR. Natural caries ; a histologic and microradiographic evaluation. J Oral Pathol 1985. 14(8)615–623.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Tooth specimen

Figure 2

Position of tooth specimen

Figure 3

Demineralization

Figure 4

Group I,II

Figure 5

Group III, IV

Figure 6

Group VI

Figure 7

Mean depth of demineralization (µm) - Days

Figure 8

Mean depth of demineralization (µm) - Groups

Table 1

Composition of initial demineralized solution (mM)

Table 1

Table 2

Mean depth of demineralization (µm)

Table 2