Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(5):430-438
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 January 14
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.5.430
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University
*Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho, Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea, 501-825, Tel : 82-62-220-3840 Fax : 82-62-232-9064, E-mail: ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the influence of application time of self-etching primers on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin using three self-etching primer adhesive systems.

Dentin surfaces were exposed from forty-eight human molars. They were conditioned with three self-etching primers (Clearfil SE Bond [SE], Unifil Bond [UF], Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus [TY]) and different primining times (10s, 20s, 30s and 40s). Composite resins were bonded to dentin surfaces and specimens were made. μTBS was tested and statistically compared using by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Test.

The results of this study presented that priming time for 10s in SE and UF groups and for 30s and 40s in TY group was highly decreased μTBS to dentin.

Figure 1.

Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2.

EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3.

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to priming times of three self-etching primer adhesives to dentin

Self-etching primer adhesives, components, pH of primers and manufacturers

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis according to adhesives and priming times

Statistical analysis of mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) at the same priming time

References

1. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29(1):55–61. 2001;
2. Inoue S, Meerbeek BV, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray symposium p131–148. 1999.
3. Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of dentin primer application methods on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 21:167–172. 1996;
4. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361–366. 2001;
5. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. ‘No-bottle’vs ‘multi-bottle’dentin adhesive-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373–380. 2001;
6. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H, Arki Y, Kubota M. Over-etching effects on micro-tensile bond strength and failure patterns for two dentin bonding systems. J Dent 30:99–105. 2001;
7. Kazemi RB, Meiers JC, Peppers K. Effect of caries disclosing agents on bond strengths of total-etching and self-etching primer dentin bonding systems to resin composite. Oper Dent 27:238–242. 2002;
8. 조영 곤, 조 공철. 자가 산부식 프라이머와 자가 산부식 접착제의 변연 미세누출. 대한치과보존학회지 27(5):493–501. 2002;
9. 조영 곤, 이석 종, 정진 호, 이영 곤, 김수 미. 치질에 접착된 자가 산부식 프라이머와 자가 산부식 접착제의 형태학적인 양상. 대 한치과보존학회지 28(1):23–33. 2003;
10. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 14:163–169. 2001;
11. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa RT. New trends in dentin/enamal adhesion. Am J Dent 13:25–30. 2000;
12. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagatun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 18:359–369. 2002;
13. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235. 2003;
14. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 18(2):111–119. 2002;
15. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185–194. 1998;
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308. 2001;
17. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer P, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of resin human root dentin. J Dent Res 24:435–442. 1996;
18. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 26:609–616. 1998;
19. Shimada Y, Senawonge P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 27:403–409. 2002;
20. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros SG, Erick JD. Microtensile testing of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 14:194–201. 1998;
21. Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 70:889–893. 1991;
22. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin system. J Esth Dent 6:227–244. 1994;
23. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Horner JA, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength versus surface area for dentine bonding-Evaluation of a method using limited surface areas. Japan J Conserv Dent 37:882–887. 1994;
24. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer(polyalkenoate) cements to dentin using four conditioners. J Dent 28:361–366. 2000;
25. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono T, Fernades CA, Tay F. The micro-tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1:299–309. 1999;
26. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas M. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14:212–222. 1998;
27. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 13:101–104. 2000;
28. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strengths to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surface. J Dent 27:523–530. 1999;
29. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of bonding systems. Oper Dent 26:375–382. 2001;
30. Toledano M, Osorio R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 14(4):205–210. 2001;
31. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, Kanemura M, Morigami M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res 78:906–911. 1999;
32. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primer teeth. Pediatric Dent 23:481–486. 2001;
33. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent 12:77–83. 1999;
34. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 31:353–358. 2000;
35. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 18:269–275. 2002;
36. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699–705. 1999;
37. Cardoso PEC, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengths of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 14:394–398. 1998;
38. Nunes MF, Swift JR EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to humam dentin. Am J Dent 14:340–343. 2001;
39. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion of testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117–125. 1995;
40. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshiyama M, Inoue S, Vargas M, Fukuda R, Okazaki M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Bonding mechanism and micro-tensile bond strength of a 4-MET-based self-etching adhesive. J Dent Res 79((Special Issue) abstract #845):p249. 2000;
41. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biometerial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 79:709–714. 2000;

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2.

EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3.

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to priming times of three self-etching primer adhesives to dentin

Table 1.

Self-etching primer adhesives, components, pH of primers and manufacturers

Adhesives Component pH Manufacturers
Primer Bonding agent
Clearfil SE Bond (SE) MDP, HEMA, water, hydrophilic DMA, photoinitiator MDP, HEMA, hydrophilic DMA, microfiller, photoinitiator 1.9 Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan

Unifil Bond (UF) 4-MET, HEMA, ethanol, water, initiator UDMA, HEMA, TEGDMA 2.2 GC Co., Tokyo, Japan

Tyrian SPE + One-Step Plus (TY) 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propanesulfonic acid, Bis (2 methacryloyloxy) ethyl) phosphate, ethanol BPDM, HEMA, acetone, glass frit, photoinitiator 0.4 Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.

MDP = 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phophate, DMA = dimethacrylate, HEMA = 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 4-MET = 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic acid, UDMA = urethane dimethacrylate, TEGDMA = triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2.

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis according to adhesives and priming times

Group Priming time Microtensile strength (mean ± S.D.) Number of specimens
SE group 10 seconds 33.78 ± 7.20a 20
20 seconds 73.22 ± 15.10b 20
30 seconds 62.80 ± 15.01b 20
40 seconds 65.53 ± 18.44b 20

UF group 10 seconds 22.87 ± 6.53c 20
20 seconds 40.04 ± 12.50d 20
30 seconds 46.28 ± 9.13d 20
40 seconds 41.19 ± 12.00d,g 20

TY group 10 seconds 47.34 ± 8.19d,f 20
20 seconds 53.16 ± 17.95f 20
30 seconds 33.98 ± 20.17a 20
40 seconds 31.25 ± 13.09a,g 20

S.D.: Standard Deviation. Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 3.

Statistical analysis of mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) at the same priming time

Priming time Microtensile bond strength No. of total specimens
10 seconds 34.66 ± 12.40a 60
20 seconds 55.47 ± 20.42b 60
30 seconds 47.71 ± 19.42b,c 60
40 seconds 45.99 ± 20.54c 60

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).