Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The effect of delayed composite resin filling on microtensile bond strength

The effect of delayed composite resin filling on microtensile bond strength

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(3):233-238
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 May 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.233
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.
Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Susuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 501-825, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of immediate or delayed composite resin filling on dentinal microtensile bond strength (µTBS) after applied the adhesive.

The coronal dentin of human third molars was exposed. Single-Bond or One-Step was applied on the dentin surfaces, and composite resin were constructed immediately (group 1) or 5 min., 10 min., 15 min., 20 min. and 30 min. (groups 2-6) after an adhesive was applied. The specimens were sectioned and made bar-shaped. Each surface area of them was about 1mm2. The µTBS test was performed by EZ test. The results were analysed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 95% significance level.

The results suggested that the µTBS of Single-Bond to dentin was decreased when the composite resin was constructed 20 min. and 30 min. after Single-Bond was applied. But the µTBS of One-Step was not affected by delayed composite resin filling.

References

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhision of acrylic filling material to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955. 34849–853.
2. Jablonski S. Illustrated dictionary of dentistry 1982. Philadelpia: WB Saunders; 236.
3. Al-Ehaideb AA, Mohammed H. Microleakege of one-bottle dentin adhesive. Oper Dent 2001. 26172–175.
4. Pashley DH, Horner JA, Brewer PD. Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992. Suppl 5137–150.
5. Jacoben T, Soderholm KJ. Dentin bonding through interpenetrating network formation. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1994. 745–52.
6. Nakabayashi N. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int 1991. 2273–74.
7. Burrow MF, Taniguchi Y, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on early bond strengths to dentine. J Dent 1995. 2341–45.
8. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992. 5213–215.
9. Masuhara E, Sato M. Ploymerization of resins for dentin filling and sealant with ultraviolet rays. DE J Dent Eng 1978. (45)1–5.
10. McCabe JF, Rushy S. Dentine bonding agents-characteristic bond strength as a function of dentine depth. J Dent 1992. 20225–230.
11. Meiers JC, Shook LW. Effect of disinfections on the bond strength of composite to dentin. Am J Dent 1996. 911–14.
12. Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of light intensity on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1995. 8(5)245–248.
13. Nakabayashi N, Kojims K, Masugara E. The promotion adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982. 16265–273.
14. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1992. 8229–233.
15. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effect of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999. 78898–905.
16. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent 1995. 8297–302.
17. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tesile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994. 10236–240.
18. Tay FR, David T, Byoung HP, Ricardo IS, Anut MC. Single-step adhesives are permeable membrane. J Dent 2002. 30371–382.
19. Manabe A, Devri K, Itoh K, Hisamitu H, Wakumoto S. Effect of delayed light curing of a resin composite on marginal integrity in cylindrical dentin cavities. J Dent 1993. 21344–349.
20. Finger W, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one-component enamel/dentin bonding agent. Am J Dent 1996. 9206–210.
21. McInnes PM, Wendt SL Jr, Retief DH, Winberg R. Effect of dentin surface roughness on shear bond strength. Dent Mater 1990. 6204–207.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Adhesives and their composition

Table 1

Bis-GMA = bisphenol-glysidyl-methacrylate, HEMA = 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2

Group classification

Table 2

S = Single Bond, O = One-Step

Table 3

Mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) according to delayed composite resin filling and statistical analysis

Table 3

S: Single Bond, O: One-Step, S.D: Standard Deviation. Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).