Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Measurement of the excessive stimulus time after the sensory threshold level during electric pulp testing

Measurement of the excessive stimulus time after the sensory threshold level during electric pulp testing

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(3):226-232
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 May 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.226
1Department of Medical Engineering, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Korea.
2Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.
Corresponding author: Seung-Jong Lee. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemoon Gu, Seoul, Korea, 120-752. Tel: 82-2-361-8700, Fax: 82-2-313-7575, sjlee@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

Use of electric pulp testing elicits painful response in vital teeth. In this study, we examined the excessive time from pain feeling to stimulation disconnection in clinical situation. D626D (Parkell Inc., USA.) scan type electric pulp tester was used in total of 23 young healthy individuals. Each of the right central incisors and first premolars were used as testing teeth. Stimulation disconnection was achieved by EMG in anterior belly of digastric muscle, finger span, and voice and the excessive stimulation time over the sensory threshold was recorded. As a result, we found that the short responses before the stimulation disconnection appeared following order; EMG, finger span, and voice. The EMG disconnection is suggested to be used to reduce the excessive stimulus time in electric pulp testing.

References

1. Ingle JI, Taintor JF. Endontics 1965. 3rd editionth ed. Lea & Febiger;
2. Byers MR. Dental sonsory receptor. Int Rev Neurobiol 1984. 2539–94.
3. Närhi MV. The characteristics of intradental sensory units and their responses to stimulation. J Dent Res 1985. 64 Spec No564–571.
4. Brannstrom M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KJ. Transmission and control of dental pain: resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1979. 99(4)612–618.
5. Hirvonen TJ, Narhi MVO, Hakumaku MOK. The excitability of dog pulp nerves in relation to the condition of dentine surface. J Endod 1984. 10(7)294–298.
6. Narhi MVO, Hirvonen TJ, Hakumaki MOK. Activation of intradental nerves in the dog to some stimuli applied to the dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1982. 27(12)1053–1058.
7. Narhi MVO, Hirvonen TJ, Hakumaki MOK. Responses of intradental nerve fibres to stimulation of dentine and pulp. Acta Physiol Scand 1982. 115(2)173–178.
8. Azerad J, Woda A, Fessard DA. Physiological properties of neurons in different parts of cat trigeminal sensory complex. Brain Res 1982. 246(1)7–21.
9. Mahan PE. Jaw depression elicited by tooth pulp stimulation. Exp Neurol 1970. 29(3)439–448.
10. Mason P, Strassman A, Maciewicz R. Is the Jaw-Opening Refelx a valid model of pain? Brain Res 1985. 357137–146.
11. Koole P, Jongh HJD, Boering G. A comparative study of electromyograms of the masseter, temporalis, and anterior digastric muscles obtained by surface and intramuscular electrodes: raw-EMG. Cranio 1991. 9(3)228–240.
12. Matthews B, Baxter J, Watts S. Sensory and reflex responses to tooth pulp stimulation in man. Brain Res 1976. 113(1)83–94.
13. Han YC, Lee JS, Lee JH. Extracellular recording in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis of the anesthetized cat produced by electrical pulp stimulation. Korean J Oral Biol 1985. 9(1)21–29.
14. Yu MG, Park SJ. Changes in autonomic responses and jaw muscle activity induced by tooth pulp stimulation in the rat. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1999. 24(1)657–665.
15. Ahlquist ML, Edwall LGA, Franzen OG, Haegerstam GAT. Perception of pulpal pain as a fuction of intradental nerve activity. Pain 1984. 19(4)353–366.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Conventional pulp vitality testing using electric pulp tester.

Figure 2

Electrode position to measure the digastric muscle EMG.

Figure 3

Flexible band sensor for measuring the finger span.

Figure 4

Measurement of pain responses during electric pulp testing.

Figure 5

Record of electric pulp testing level, EMG, finger span, and voice during electric pulp testing (① : time of electric pulp testing, ②, ③, ④ time delay between showing EMG, finger span, and voice response and stimulation stop, respectively).

Figure 6

Time delay between the examiner and examinee (central incisor, EMG1)

Figure 7

Time delay between the examiner and examinee (premolar, EMG1)

Figure 8

Time delay between the examiner and examinee (central incisor, EMG2)

Figure 9

Time delay between the examiner and examinee (premolar, EMG2)

Table 1

Time delay between EMG, finger span, and voice response and stimulation disconnection, respectively (EMG 1)

Table 1

Table 2

Time delay between showing EMG, finger span, and voice response and stimulation stop, respectively (EMG 2)

Table 2

Table 3

Maximum power value of EMG in digastric muscle as the electrode position by electric pulp testing

Table 3