Marginal microleakage of single step adhesives
Article information
Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(2):162-169
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 March 31
doi :
https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.162
Abstract
This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3), Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5).
The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests.
The results of this study were as follows;
Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05).
Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05).
Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups.
In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.
Keywords: Marginal microleakage; Single step adhesives; Class V cavity preparation; Dye penetration; Enamel margins; Dentin margins
References
1. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001. 1431–33.
2. Gladys S, Meerbeek BV, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 2001. 14170–176.
3. Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quantititive evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002. 27475–479.
4. Gagliardi RM, Avelar RP. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002. 27582–586.
5. Hannig M, Fu B. Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of class V restorations bonded with self-etching primers. J Adhes Dent 2001. 3265–272.
6. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'No-bottle' vs multi-bottle' dentin adhesive-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001. 17373–380.
7. Inoue S, Meerbeek BV, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives 1999. In : Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray symposium. 131–148.
8. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003. 28215–235.
9. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995. 2695–110.
10. Balooch M, Wu-Magidi IC, Balazs A, Lundkvist AS, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Siekhaus WJ, Kinney JH. Viscoelastic properties of demineralized human dentin measured in water with an atomic force microscope (AFM) based indentation. J Biomed Mater Res 1998. 40539–544.
11. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1996. 27619–625.
12. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997. 25355–372.
13. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001. 17296–308.
14. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 1997. 10219–223.
15. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 2001. 14361–366.
16. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998. 261–20.
17. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petchelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 1999. 311–17.
18. Opdam NJM, Roesters JJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998. 26555–562.
19. da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001. 23315–320.
20. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 1996. 751706–1715.
21. Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentinal fluid. Am J Dent 2000. 13195–200.
22. Brackett WW, Covey DA, Germain HA. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002. 27218–222.
23. Croll TP. Self-etching adhesive system for resin bonding. ASDC J Dent Child 2000. 176–181.
24. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa RT. New trends in dentin/enamal adhesion. Am J Dent 2000. 1325D–30D.
25. Sonoda H, Sasafuchi Y, Kitasako Y, Arakawa M, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Pulpal response to a fluoride-releasing all-in-one resin bonding system. Oper Dent 2002. 27271–277.
26. Ohno H, Kimura M, Fuchigami S, Oguri M. Dental composition United states patent number 5,739,177. 1998. 04. 14.
27. Kleter GA, Damen JJM, Everts V, Niehof J, Ten Cate JM. The influence of the organic matrix on demineralization of bovine root dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1994. 731523–1529.
28. Nunes MF, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. The effect of an experimental one-application self-conditioning adhesives on microleakage. J Dent Res 1999. 78306. (abstract no. 1602).
29. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 2000. 31353–358.
30. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002. 18(2)111–119.
31. Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996. 27253–258.
32. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The compositon between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984. 631396–1399.
33. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without: softstart polymerization. J Dent 1997. 25321–330.
34. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities. Oper Dent 2003. 2842–46.
35. Ferrari M, Garcia-Godoy F. Sealing ability of new generation adhesive-restorative materials placed on vital teeth. Am J Dent 2002. 15117–128.
36. Hofmann N, Siebrecht C, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 2003. 28(2)160–167.
37. Pontes DG, Melo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 2002. 33136–139.
38. Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 1994. 19133–137.
39. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent 2001. 14344–348.
40. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composite on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2001. 3207–225.
41. Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Investigation of self-etching dentin primers. Dent Mater 1989. 5408–410.
42. Swift EJ Jr, Bayne SC. Shear bond strength of a new one-bottle dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1997. 10184–188.
43. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 2001. 14163–169.
44. Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with cocure vs pre-cure technique. Oper Dent 2000. 25292–298.
45. Santini A, Plasschaert AJM, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001. 14132–136.
Article information Continued
Copyright © 2004 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
