Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(2):153-161
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.153
Hee-Young Kang, Young-Gon Cho, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park, Sang-Hoon Yoo, Cheul-Hee Jin, Hee-Young Choi, Young-Jae Ki
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.
Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 375 Susuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-759, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

Abstract

This study investigated that the effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength (µTBS). Human molars were sectioned to expose the superficial dentin surfaces.

Samples were divided into two groups according to type of adhesives-Single Bond (S) and One-Step (O)], and again subdivided into five groups by different dentin surface treatment-dry for 15s (D), blot dry (BD) or dry for 15s, and rewet with different rewetting agents [distilled water (DW), Gluma Desensitizer (GD) and Aqua-Prep (AP)] for 30s. After application of adhesive, composite resin was built up on the bonding surface. Each tooth was sectioned to obtain stick with 1 mm2 cross sectional area and the µTBS was determined by EZ test.

In the S group, the mean µTBS of GD, AP and BD group was significantly higher than that of DW and D group (p < 0.05). In the O group, the mean µTBS of AP, GD, BD and DW group was significantly higher than that of D group (p < 0.05).

The data suggested that Gluma Desensitizer and Aqua-Prep could be successfully used as rewetting agents, and Distilled water could be acceptable in aceton based adhesive system only.

Keywords: Microtensile bond strength; One-bottle adhesive; Rewetting agent; Distilled water; Gluma Desensitizer; Aqua-Prep

References

1. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL Jr. Microleakage of hydrophillic systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001. 14(1)31–34.
2. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I. Bond strength of single bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2000. 252–10.
3. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer-adhesives. Dent Mater 1996. 12236–244.
4. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 2000. 13(6)324–328.
5. Perdigão J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re-wetting agent on the performance of acetone-based dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1998. 11207–213.
6. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 2001. 32(5)385–390.
7. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992. 5127–129.
8. Kanca J. Effect of drying on bonding strength. J Dent Res 1991. 70304. (Abstract 1029).
9. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 1994. 7(3)144–148.
10. Marshall GW, Watanabe LG, Wu-Magidi IL. AFM study of drying and rehydration of etched dentin. J Dent Res 1996. 75390.
11. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible re-wetting. Am J Dent 1997. 1077–82.
12. Perdigao J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1999. 15282–295.
13. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effects of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthet Dent 2000. 12(2)85–96.
14. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono T, Fernades CA, Tay F. The micro-tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999. 1299–309.
15. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. J Esthet Dent 1994. 6227–244.
16. Chappell RP, Schreiner RF, Glaros AG, Eixk J. Pilot study of determine sample size for micro-tensile testing. J Dent Res 1997. 7638. (Abstract 193).
17. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. J Dent Res 1995. 741093–1102.
18. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Erick JD. Microtensile testing of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1998. 14(3)194–201.
19. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Horner JA, Phashley DH. Tensile bond strength versus surface area for dentin bonding-Evaluation of a method using limited surface areas. J Conserv Dent 1994. 37882–887.
20. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1992. 8229–233.
21. Cho YG, Park YY, Lee YG. Effect of a rewetting agent on dentin adhesion. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003. 28(1)11–22.
22. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982. 16265–273.
23. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE. Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strenghs and hybrid layer formation. Am J Dent 2001. 14(5)319–323.
24. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int 1993. 24(8)571–582.
25. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995. 11117–125.
26. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR. In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strength of one-bottle adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002. 14(1)31–38.
27. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003. 28215–235.
28. Suzuke K, Takahashi M, Nakai H. Treatment of dentin by aqueous solution of amino acid derivatives: HEMA. J Adhes Dent 1990. 843–51.
29. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengths of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1998. 14394–398.
30. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagatun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002. 18359–369.
31. Nunes MF, Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to humam dentin. Am J Dent 2001. 14340–343.
32. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas M. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998. 14212–222.
33. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992. 5213–215.
34. Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996. 9273–276.
35. Carvalho RM, Yoshima M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 1996. 41369–377.
36. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 1996. 751034–1044.
37. Gallo JR, Henderson M, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 2000. 13(5)267–270.
38. Kanca J 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992. 23(1)39–41.
39. Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1998. 11(5)225–228.
40. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 1996. 751851–1858.
41. Harashima I, Hirasawa T. Adsorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater J 1990. 936–46.
42. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effects of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992. 8125–130.
43. Nakabayashi N, Watanae A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 1992. 8259–264.
44. Sugizaki J. The effects of various primers on dentin adhesion of resin composites. SEM and TEM observation of the resin impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primer. Jap J Cons Dent 1991. 34228–265.
45. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Improved efficacy of dentin bonding agents. Eur J Oral Sci 1997. 105(5 Pt 1)434–439.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2004 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2

Figure 2

EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3

Figure 3

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to adhesives and dentin surface treatment

Table 1

Chemical formulations of the adhesive systems used

Table 1

Bis-GMA = bisphenol-glysidyl-methacrylate, HEMA = 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2

Chemical formulations of the rewetting agent used

Table 2

Table 3

The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis of each adhesive in different dentin surface treatment

Table 3

S: Single Bond, O: One-Step

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 4

The mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) according to different dentin treatment and statistical analysis

Table 4

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).