Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2004;29(1):1-12
Publication date (electronic) : 2004 January 14
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.1
Jung-Mi Kwon, Kyung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Jin Park,
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University
Corresponding author: Sang-Jin Park, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduated School of Kyung Hee University 1, Hoegi Dong, Dongdaemoon Gu, Seoul, 130-702, Korea, Tel : 02) 958-9335, E-mail : psangjin@khu.ac.kr
Fig. 1.

Specimen preparation for tensile bonding test: A) cavity preparation on buccal cervical area, B) adhesive systems bonding and restoration, additional composite build-up, C) vertical slice with 1mm thickness, D) trimmed specimen with hour glass shape.

Fig. 2.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Occlusal wall

Fig. 3.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Gingival wall

Fig. 4.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths of occlusal and gingival wall

Fig. 5A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 5B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 6A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 6B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 7A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 7B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 8A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 8B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 9A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 9B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the gingival wall.

Materials used in this study

Five experimental groups

Micro-tensile bond strength of experimental groups (Unit : MPa±SD)

References

1. Antonucci JM, McKinney JE, Stanabury JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement. US patent application 160856. 1988.
2. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 27:203–209. 1996;
3. Van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a com-pomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class Ⅲ restoration. Am J Dent 9:195–198. 1996;
4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34:849–853. 1955;
5. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin at the adhesive interface. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devic 1:78–81. 1982;
6. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 25:355–372. 1997;
7. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão P, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1–20. 1998;
8. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N. Bonding durability of photocured phenyl-P in TEGDMA to smear layer-retained dentin. Quintessence Int 24:335–342. 1993;
9. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706–1715. 1996;
10. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185–194. 1998;
11. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73:1212–1220. 1994;
12. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404–1413. 1996;
13. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Homer JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 24:435–442. 1996;
14. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236–240. 1994;
15. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-effected dentin using adhesives. J Dent Res 74:1679–1688. 1995;
16. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Boschian L, Burrow M, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami T. Effect of water and regional difference on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res 76:20 Abstract 56. 1997;
17. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Pashley DH. Effect of C-factor and depth on bonding strength to dentin. J Dent Res 76:39 Abstract 201. 1997;
18. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 13:236–240. 1994;
19. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J 3rd. Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesions. Am J Dent 5:315–317. 1992;
20. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage : leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18–25. 1995;
21. Wang T, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 2-(methacryloxy) ethyl phenyl hydrogen phosphate on adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 70:59–66. 1991;
22. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure : A comparison of glass-ionomer and composite resin systems. J Esthet Dent 6:227–244. 1994;
23. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Tei R, Tagami J. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Am J Dent 10:128–132. 1997;
24. Valeria VG, Daniel B, Karl-John S. Enamel and dentin shear bond strength of two resin-modified glass ionomers and two resin baced adhesives. J Dent 26:497–503. 1998;
25. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 77:1749–59. 1998;
26. Yip HK, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glasss ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 31:261–266. 2000;
27. Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 25:20–25. 2000;
28. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubular orientation on the bond strength between resin and dentin. J Dent 27:265–274. 1999;
29. Non-Rinse Conditioner(NRC). Dentsply Technical Manual Konstanz, Germany: 1998.
30. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Effect of dentin Primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 24:81–88. 1994;
31. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 26:27–35. 2001;
32. Perdigão J, May Jr KN, Wilder Jr AD, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid laayer. Oper Dent 25:186–194. 2000;
33. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180–187. 2000;
34. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin-bonding. Quintessence Int 26:733–738. 1995;
35. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effect of acidic conditioners on dentin demineralization and dimension of hybrid layers. J Dent 26:211–216. 1996;
36. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 73:1205–1211. 1994;
37. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434–1442. 1993;
38. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117–125. 1995;

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2004 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Specimen preparation for tensile bonding test: A) cavity preparation on buccal cervical area, B) adhesive systems bonding and restoration, additional composite build-up, C) vertical slice with 1mm thickness, D) trimmed specimen with hour glass shape.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Occlusal wall

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Gingival wall

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths of occlusal and gingival wall

Fig. 5A.

Fig. 5A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 5B.

Fig. 5B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 6A.

Fig. 6A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 6B.

Fig. 6B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 7A.

Fig. 7A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 7B.

Fig. 7B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 8A.

Fig. 8A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 8B.

Fig. 8B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 9A.

Fig. 9A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 9B.

Fig. 9B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the gingival wall.

Table 1.

Materials used in this study

Products Main Components Manufacturer
Resin modified glass ionomer
Fuji Ⅱ LC fluoroaluminum silicate glass, GC Co.
polyacrylic acid, HEMA (Tokyo, Japan)
Dentin Conditioner 20% polyacrylic acid with 3% AlCl3
Compomer
Dyract AP resin, strontium-fluoro silicate glass
Prime & Bond NT Etchant 36% Phosphoric acid Dentsply Caulk
Adhesive UDMA, PENTA, nanofiller, acetone, trimethacrylate resin (Milford, USA)
Non Rinse Conditioner itaconic acid, maleic acid
Self-etching system
Clearfil SE Bond Primer MDP, HEMA, water Kuraray Co.
Adhesive dimethacrylate, microfiller, MDP, HEMA (Osaka, Japan)
Self-priming system
Single Bond Etchant 37% Phosphoric acid 3M Co.
Adhesive HEMA, Bis-GMA, ethanol, water (St. Paul, MN,
Polyalkenoic acid copolymer USA)
Resin composite
Clearfil AP-X Barium glass, silicone dioxide, Kuraray Co.
3.0§(0.1~15§), 84.5wt％ (Osaka, Japan)

Bis-GMA=Bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate

HEMA=Hydroxyethylmethacrylate

MDP=methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate

Table 2.

Five experimental groups

Group Materials
GI Fuji Ⅱ LC Dentin Conditioner
DE Dyract AP Prime&Bond NT(with Etching)
DN Dyract AP Prime&Bond NT(with NRC)
SE Clearfil AP-X Clearfil SE Bond
SB Clearfil AP-X Single Bond

Table 3.

Micro-tensile bond strength of experimental groups (Unit : MPa±SD)

Group Occlusal wall Gingival wall
GI 23.27± 8.63a 15.09± 5.10a
DE 29.84±10.54ab 16.52± 4.14a
DN 29.63± 9.94abA 22.53±11.90abA
SE 36.34±11.11b 27.51± 7.99b
SB 36.47±13.39bA 30.20±12.40bA

Mean values with the same uppercase and lowercase superscript letters are not statistically different(p>0.05).