Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Microtensile bonding of resin fiber reinforced post to radicular dentin using resin cement


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Microtensile bonding of resin fiber reinforced post to radicular dentin using resin cement

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2003;28(1):80-88
Publication date (electronic) : 2003 January 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.080
Jin-Woo Kim, Mi-Kyung Yu, Se-Joon Lee, Kwang-Won Lee
Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Korea.
Corresponding author (lkw@moak.chonbuk.ac.kr)

Abstract

Object

The purpose of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of resin fiber reinforced post to radicular dentin using resin cement according to various dentin surface treatment and to observe the interface between post and root dentin under SEM.

Material and Method

A total 16 extracted human single rooted teeth were used.

A lingual access was made using a #245 carbide bur in a high-speed handpiece with copious air water spray. The post space was mechanically enlarged using H-file(up to #60) and Gates Glidden bures(#3). This was followed by refining of the canal space using the calbrating drill set provided in ER Dentinpost(GEBR, BRASSELER GmbH&Co. KG).

The 16 teeth were randomly distributed into 4 group of 4 teeth.

Group 1 teeth had their post space prepared using 10% phosphoric acid as root canal surface treatment agent during 20s. The canal was then rinsed with saline and dried with paper point.

Group 2 teeth had their post space prepared using 3% NaOCl as root canal surface treatment agent during 30min. The canal was then rinsed with saline and dried with paper point.

Group 3 teeth had their post space prepared using 17% EDTA as root canal surface treatment agent during 1min. The canal was then rinsed with saline and dried with paper point.

Group 4 teeth had their post space prepared using 17% EDTA as root canal surface treatment agent during 1min. After rinsing with saline, the canal was rinced 10ml of 3% NaOCl for 30min.

After drying with paper point, the post(ER Dentinpost, GEBR, BRASSELER GmbH&Co. KG) was placed in the treated canals using resin cement. Once the canal was filled with resin cement(Super bond C&B sunmedical co. Ltd.), a lentulo was inserted to the depth of the canal to ensure proper coating of the root canal wall.

After 24 hours, acrylic resin blocks(10·10·50mm) were made. The resin block was serially sectioned vertically into stick of 1·1mm. Twenty sticks were prepared from each group. After that, tensile bond strengths for each stick was measured with Microtensile Tester.

Failure pattern of the specimen at the interface between post and dentin were observed under SEM.

Results

1. Tensile bond strengths(meen±SD) were expressed with ascending order as follows ; group 4, 12.52±6.60 ; group 1, 7.63±5.83 ; group 2, 4.13±2.31 ; group 3, 3.31±1.44.

2. Tensile bond strengths of Group 4 treated with 17% EDTA +3%NaOCl were significant higher than those of group 1, 2 and 3 (p<0.05).

3. Tensile bond strengths of Group 1 treated with 10% phosphoric acid were significant higher than those of group 2 (p<0.05). Tensile bond strengths of Group 4 treated with 17% EDTA +3% NaOCl was significant higher than those of other groups.

References

1. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparision of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998. 80527–532.
2. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999. 27275–278.
3. Platt JA. Resin-based luting cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000. 21740–742.
4. Calt S, Serper A. Time-Dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002. 2817–19.
5. Harrison JW, Hand RE. The effect of dulution and orgnic matter on the antibacterial of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 1981. 7128–132.
6. Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001. 27753–757.
7. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001. 27321–324.
8. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensilebondtest :a review. J Adhes Dent 1999. 1299–309.
9. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relation between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength -Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994. 10236–240.
10. Pashley DH, Samo H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents : A Review. Dent Mater 1995. 11117–125.
11. Chappell R, Schreiner R, Glaros A, Eixk J. Pilot study to determine sample size for micro-tensile testing. J Dent Res 1997. 7638.
12. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001. 2697–104.
13. Sudsangiam S, Van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1999. 157–67.
14. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989. 1761–67.
15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on onding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001. 17422–429.
16. Chow TW. Mechanical effectivenss of root canal irrigation. J Endod 1983. 9475–479.
17. Scelza MF, Antoniazzi JH, Scelza P. Efficacy of final irrigation-a scanning electron microscopic evaluationcccc. J Endod 2000. 26355–358.
18. Cunningham WT, Balekjian AY. Effect of temperature on collagen-dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980. 49175–177.
19. Niu W, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. A scanning electron microscopic study of dentinal erosion by final irrigation with EDTA and NaOCl solutions. Int Endod J 2002. 35934–939.
20. Villegas JC, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Obturation of accessory canals after four different final irrigation regimes. J Endod 2002. 28534–536.
21. Serper A, Calt S. The demineralizing effects of EDTA at different concentrations and pH. J Endod 2002. 28501–502.
22. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Tnikaido T, Tagami J. Long-term tensile bond durability of two different 4-MATA containing resin cement to dentin. Dent Mater 2002. 18276–280.
23. Goldman M, Devitre R, white R, Nathanson D. An SEM study of post cemented with an unfilled resin. J Dent Res 1984. 631003–1005.
24. Chang JC, Hurst TL, Hart DA, Estey AW. 4-META use in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002. 87216–224.
25. Calt S, Serper A. Smear layer removal by EGTA. J Endod 2000. 26459–461.
26. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002. 18609–621.
27. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 2002. 18495–502.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2003 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of serial section of tooth.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Section of teeth.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Specimen preparation for testing.

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

The specimen was glued to jig with cyanoacrylate cement.

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

Isomet saw(Buehler Ltd.,Lake Bluff.IL).

Fig. 6

Fig. 6

Microtensile bond strength tester.

Fig. 7

Fig. 7

Bar graph of bond strengths of experimental Groups.

Fig. 8

Fig. 8

Post surface of fractured specimen of group 1 (SEM×1000).

Fig. 9

Fig. 9

Dentin surface of fractured specimen of group 1 (SEM×1000).

Fig. 10

Fig. 10

Post surface of fractured specimen of group 2 (SEM×500).

Fig. 11

Fig. 11

Dentin surface of fractured specimen of group 2 (SEM×1000).

Fig. 12

Fig. 12

Dentin surface of fractured specimen of group 3 (SEM×1000).

Fig. 13

Fig. 13

Post surface of fractured specimen of group 3 (SEM×500, RC;resin cement, D;dentin).

Fig. 14

Fig. 14

Dentin surface of fractured specimen of group 4 (SEM×1000).

Fig. 15

Fig. 15

Post surface of fractured specimen of group 4 (SEM×1000).

Table 1

Materals used in this study.

Table 1

Table 2

Experimental Groups.

Table 2

Table 3

Tensile bond strengths of experimental Groups(MPa).

Table 3

Table 4

Comparision of microtensile bond strengths among Groups.

Table 4