Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Effect of cryotherapy duration on experimentally induced connective tissue inflammation <i xmlns="">in vivo</i>

Effect of cryotherapy duration on experimentally induced connective tissue inflammation in vivo

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2023;48.e29
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 August 02
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e29
1Department of Endodontics, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA.
2Department of Endodontics, Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC), Tijuana, Mexico.
3Department of Endodontics, Instituto Yury Kuttler, Mexico City, Mexico.
4Discipline of Endodontology, Division of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
5Faculty of Dentistry Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Citation: Vera J, Castro-Nuñez MA, Troncoso-Cibrian MF, Carrillo-Varguez AG, Méndez Sánchez ER, Sarmiento V, Lanzagorta-Rebollo L, Neelakantan P, Romero M, Arias A. Effect of cryotherapy duration on experimentally induced connective tissue inflammation in vivo. Restor Dent Endod 2023;48(3):e29.

Correspondence to Jorge Vera, DDS, MS. University of Missouri, 650 E 25th Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. jveraro@yahoo.com.mx
Received 2023 February 15; Revised 2023 April 26; Accepted 2023 April 28.

Abstract

Objectives

This study tested the hypothesis that cryotherapy duration influences lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation in a rat model.

Materials and Methods

Six Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus) were used. Five sites were selected per animal and divided into 5 groups: a negative control group (NC), 2 positive control groups (PC1 and PC2), and 2 experimental groups (E1 and E2). Cryotherapy was applied for 1 minute (E1) or 5 minutes (E2). An acute inflammatory response was induced in the PC and E groups via subcutaneous administration of 0.5 mL/kg. In the PC2 group, a catheter was inserted without additional treatment. For the E1 and E2 groups, 2.5°C saline solution was administered through the implanted catheters for 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. The rats were sacrificed, and samples were obtained and processed for histological analysis, specifically examining the presence of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and hemorrhage. The χ2 test was used to compare the presence of acute inflammation across groups. Dependent variables were compared using the linear-by-linear association test.

Results

Inflammation and hemorrhage varied significantly among the groups (p = 0.001). A significantly higher degree of acute inflammation was detected (p = 0.0002) in the PC and E1 samples than in the E2 group, in which cryotherapy was administered for 5 minutes. The PC and E1 groups also exhibited significantly greater numbers of neutrophils (p = 0.007), which were essentially absent in both the NC and E2 groups.

Conclusions

Cryotherapy administration for 5 minutes reduced the acute inflammation associated with LPS and catheter implantation.

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory periapical lesions, a common sequela to pulp necrosis, represent a defensive host response to microbial invasion of the root canal system [12]. Histologically, inflammation is characterized by the presence of fibrous connective and granulation tissue, proliferating epithelium, and various types of inflammatory cells [3]. These cells primarily include lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) [45]. The histological difference between acute and chronic inflammation lies in the presence of leukocytes within the tissue. In cases of acute inflammation, PMNs predominate, while macrophages and lymphocytes are more prevalent in chronic inflammation [67].

Pain management during and after root canal treatment is one of the most important aspects of endodontic practice [8]. Postoperative pain, which is extremely unpleasant for patients, has been reported to occur at frequencies between 3% and 58% [9]. Various methods have been used to manage postoperative pain, including cryotherapy. The term “cryotherapy” originates from the Greek word “cryos,” meaning cold. Both physiological and clinical evidence suggest that cold therapy, in its various forms, can reduce nerve conductivity time, hemorrhage, edema, and local inflammation. Cryotherapy has been demonstrated to be effective at alleviating musculoskeletal pain, muscle spasms, and connective tissue distension [101112].

Endodontic cryotherapy is conducted through intracanal irrigation following the cleaning, disinfection, and shaping of the root canal system. An in vitro study demonstrated that continuous irrigation with a cold saline solution at 2.5°C, coupled with negative pressure, could decrease the extraradicular temperature by over 10ºC [12]. In vivo studies have indicated that endodontic cryotherapy can alleviate postoperative symptoms in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis, and symptomatic apical periodontitis [1012131415].

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a component found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Its primary virulence factor is a potent endotoxin that triggers a sustained inflammatory response [16]. When LPS is present in connective tissue, even in low doses, it acts as a chemoattractant for neutrophils and prompts the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These cytokines activate the neuroimmune and neuroendocrine systems, leading to disease [17]. To counteract this, anti-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin 10 are produced, serving as compensatory mechanisms to mitigate excessive inflammation [161819]. In the past, endodontic cryotherapy has typically been administered for periods of 4 to 5 minutes, a recommendation drawn from the existing medical literature. However, limited information exists regarding the standardization of key factors such as the duration of therapy, method of administration, type of cold agent used, cellular mechanisms, and specific cells involved in the process. The present study was conducted to shed light on how the duration of cryotherapy impacts the suppression of acute inflammatory response in an animal model.

This study employed this animal model to assess the effectiveness of cryotherapy, applied for durations of 1 and 5 minutes, in reducing acute inflammation caused by catheter insertion of LPS. The null hypothesis proposed no difference in the effectiveness of cryotherapy, whether applied for 1 or 5 minutes. In contrast, the alternative hypothesis suggested that a 5-minute application of cryotherapy would be more effective than a 1-minute application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) University of Baja California (UABC), approval under the IRB number 305-2545.

For this study, 6 Wistar rats, aged between 4 to 6 months and weighing between 200 to 280 g, were utilized. The rats were anesthetized through an intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (10 mg/kg) (Xilacina, PiSA BioPharm, Albany, NY, USA) and ketamine (25 mg/kg) (Ketamina, Cheminova Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India). Prior to catheter insertion, the area was disinfected using an iodine solution. An acute inflammatory response was induced via subcutaneous injection of 0.5 mL/kg body weight of iron-containing Escherichia coli LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) into the rat dorsum. The injection was performed at the center of the animal along the midline (dorsal and ventral).

Pilot studies conducted on a separate group of rats revealed acute inflammation of the connective tissue at 45 minutes post-injection. For the present study, 5 specific sites were selected on each rat for examination: the rostral-dorsal, mid-dorsal, caudal-dorsal, rostral-ventral, and caudal-ventral areas (Figure 1). The rats were then divided into 3 control groups and 2 experimental groups.

Figure 1

The 5 sites of the rats and their allocation to positive control (PC1 and PC2) and experimental groups (E1 and E2).

NC, negative control group.

  • 1. Negative control group (NC): This consisted of healthy connective tissue from the caudal-ventral area that underwent no treatment.

  • 2. Positive control group 1 (PC1): The rostral-dorsal area received an injection of LPS, but no subsequent treatment was applied.

  • 3. Positive control group 2 (PC2): The rostral-ventral area received an injection of LPS and a catheter was inserted, but no subsequent treatment was applied.

  • 4. Experimental group 1 (E1): Following LPS injection and catheter insertion to the mid-dorsal area, cryotherapy was applied for 1 minute.

  • 5. Experimental group 2 (E2): Following LPS injection and catheter insertion to the caudal-dorsal area, cryotherapy was applied for 5 minutes.

The following outlines the protocol for the E1 and E2. A catheter (14-G, 48 mm long, BD Insyte, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was inserted laterally above the subcutaneous tissue. The catheter was then connected to a venoclysis device and implanted 45 minutes after injection of the LPS suspension. The injection site was either the mid-dorsal or caudal area of the rat, determined after meticulous dissection. Subsequently, a continuous flow of saline solution, maintained at 2.5°C, was administered for either 1 or 5 minutes.

Sample collection and processing

Immediately after the application of cryotherapy, the animals were sacrificed using a 1-mL intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital. Tissue samples, measuring 3 × 3 cm, were then preserved in 10% formalin (Hycel, Houston, TX, USA).

Histopathological analysis

The processed samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for examination under light microscopy. The histological analysis involved identifying neutrophils and assessing the degree of inflammation. The cellular analysis entailed identifying and counting PMNs, as well as determining the presence or absence of hemorrhage.

Statistical analysis

The degree of acute inflammation, the presence of hemorrhage, and the presence of PMNs were categorized using an ordinal scale (absent, mild, moderate, or intense). This scale was based on the degree of inflammation, as indicated by the presence of neutrophils both alone and with other inflammatory cells, observed under high-power field microscopy. The scale was adapted from the modified International ISO standard 10993-10. The categories were defined as follows: absent (0), mild (1–50), moderate (51–100), and intense (greater than 100). These ratings were then compared across groups using the linear-by-linear association test, also known as the ordinal (linear) χ2 test. Additionally, the type of inflammation was compared among groups using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

For each group, Table 1 presents the percentage (%) of specimens exhibiting the various degrees of inflammation and presence of hemorrhage. The type of inflammation varied significantly among the groups (p = 0.001). The NC exhibited minimal inflammation, while the PC1 and PC2 displayed a mixed pattern of acute inflammation and hemorrhage (Figure 2). When cryotherapy was applied for 5 minutes, 60% of the subjects showed no signs of acute inflammation, while 40% exhibited moderate acute inflammation. The PC1 and PC2 and the group receiving cryotherapy for 1 minute demonstrated a significantly higher degree of inflammation (p = 0.0002) than the group receiving 5 minutes of cryotherapy. PMNs were virtually absent in the NC and in the samples that had received 5 minutes of cryotherapy. However, a significant increase was noted in cell count in the PC1 and PC2 and in the samples treated with 1 minute of cryotherapy. No significant differences were observed among groups in terms of hemorrhage, which was entirely absent in the NC and in the group receiving 5 minutes of cryotherapy (Figure 3).

Percentage (%) of specimens per group and category, detailing the presence and degree of inflammation, hemorrhage, and neutrophils

Figure 2

(A) Negative control showing the absence of inflammation. (B) Positive control showing the presence of hemorrhage and inflammation. (C) Presence of inflammation and abundant hemorrhage.

Figure 3

(A, B) Negative control showing the presence of fibroblasts and a few neutrophils. (C) Presence of a few neutrophils in an experimental group 2 (E2) sample. (D) Absence of inflammation or hemorrhage in an E2 sample.

DISCUSSION

Patients who experience pain are typically prescribed anti-inflammatory medications following their treatment. However, a growing number of patients have medical contraindications, such as gastrointestinal complications or other health issues, that restrict the use of these medications. Therefore, alternative methods of postoperative pain management are crucial for these individuals.

Cryotherapy has recently emerged as an alternative method for managing postoperative pain in endodontics. Numerous studies suggest that the temperature of the intracanal irrigant used, along with the duration of its application, are important considerations in effective pain management.

Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intracanal, intraoral, and extraoral cryotherapy in reducing postoperative pain during endodontic treatment. This applies to teeth with either vital or necrotic pulp, as well as teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis or normal periapical tissues [101213141520]. Intracanal cryotherapy is a cost-effective and easily administered treatment. This is because the clinician already has access to the root canal system during the procedure, and the treatment time is only minimally extended.

The mechanism of action and efficacy of cryotherapy have been documented, but standardization is still lacking regarding factors such as the duration of therapy in connective tissue [2122]. In the present study, adult rats were infused with a subcutaneous LPS suspension, followed by the application of cryotherapy at 2 different time intervals (1 and 5 minutes). To assess the degree of inflammation, tissue samples were obtained immediately after the application of cryotherapy, and histological analysis was performed. Prior to the experimental design of the present study, pilot studies were conducted on 6 rats. This pilot investigation revealed that acute inflammation was induced in the connective tissue 45 minutes after LPS infusion. This contrasted with the inflammation observed following catheter insertion and in healthy, non-infused tissue. The findings indicated that due to its invasive nature, the mere application of the catheter initiated an inflammatory process, albeit typically of a mild degree. The samples from the E1 and E2 comprised tissue in which inflammation had been induced and catheters had been implanted for the administration of 1- and 5-minute cryotherapy sessions. We found that administering a cold sterile saline solution, maintained at 2.5ºC for 5 minutes, reduced acute inflammation more effectively than a 1-minute cryotherapy session. According to prior studies, the difference between saline solution administered at 2.5°C through a catheter and the extraradicular temperature of 8.37°C, as previously demonstrated [12], should not produce different clinical outcomes in cryotherapy [121314].

Based on the findings of this in vivo study, we recommend administering a cold saline solution for 5 minutes as a method to alleviate acute inflammation.

The localized impact of cryotherapy can be attributed to a reduction in tissue temperature [21]. This decrease in temperature leads to vasoconstriction and a subsequent reduction in edema [22]. Vasoconstriction also lowers cellular metabolism, thereby reducing oxygen levels, which in turn limits the generation of tissue free radicals and cellular demand [212223]. The reduction in cellular demand decreases cellular recruitment and the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, which ultimately lessens the inflammatory process. In the present study, we noted a reduction in the accumulation of acute inflammatory cells in the E1 and E2, which was most dramatic when cryotherapy was applied for 5 minutes.

Regarding the effects of cryotherapy in endodontics, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses have produced contradictory results. This discrepancy is likely due to the inclusion of randomized controlled trials with methodological deficiencies [24] or those deemed to provide low-quality evidence [25]. According to quantitative analysis, intracanal cryotherapy does not seem to significantly reduce post-endodontic pain [26]. However, another systematic review found that intracanal cryotherapy effectively reduced postoperative pain in teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis [27]. The variation in results of studies across these systematic reviews could be attributed to differences in the endodontic techniques employed, the initial pulpal diagnosis, and (most notably) the presence or absence of symptomatic apical periodontitis versus normal apical tissues. Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, the benefits of intracanal cryotherapy have been extended to primary teeth, where it is seen as a simple, cost-effective, and non-toxic treatment for managing post-endodontic pain [28].

In a clinical setting, cryotherapy is typically administered after the completion of cleaning and shaping procedures, but before the application of intracanal medication or obturation. In previous endodontic clinical trials, cryotherapy was applied for 4 to 5 minutes, as suggested by medical studies. However, those trials did not evaluate whether shorter durations would be similarly effective, or whether longer periods would further decrease postoperative pain and inflammation. The present study was designed to determine whether a brief, 1-minute application of cryotherapy could be as effective as a 5-minute application in reducing connective tissue inflammation caused by LPS and catheter insertion. Future research will delve into the mechanisms behind the observed effects, examining aspects such as gene expression, cytokine production, and protein expression. This study did not include an analysis of cell-specific markers or the use of immunohistochemistry to identify inflammatory cells, which could be a focus of future research.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a 5-minute administration of cryotherapy significantly reduces the acute inflammatory process induced by LPS and catheter insertion compared to 1 minute of cryotherapy.

Notes

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Vera J, Méndez Sánchez ER, Sarmiento V, Lanzagorta-Rebollo L.

  • Data curation: Arias A.

  • Investigation: Vera J, Castro-Nuñez MA, Troncoso-Cibrian MF, Carrillo-Varguez AG, Méndez Sánchez ER, Sarmiento V.

  • Methodology: Vera J, Méndez Sánchez ER, Sarmiento V, Arias A.

  • Software: Arias A.

  • Supervision: name.

  • Validation: Vera J, Arias A.

  • Writing - original draft: Vera J, Castro-Nuñez MA, Troncoso-Cibrian MF, Carrillo-Varguez AG, Méndez Sánchez ER, Sarmiento V.

  • Writing - review & editing: Vera J, Lanzagorta-Rebollo L, Neelakantan P, Romero M, Arias A.

References

1. Burgener B, Ford AR, Situ H, Fayad MI, Hao JJ, Wenckus CS, Johnson BR, BeGole EA, George A. Biologic markers for odontogenic periradicular periodontitis. J Endod 2010;36:1307–1310. 20647085.
2. Ricucci D, Pascon EA, Ford TR, Langeland K. Epithelium and bacteria in periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:239–249. 16448928.
3. Punchard NA, Whelan CJ, Adcock I. The Journal of Inflammation. J Inflamm (Lond) 2004;1:1. 15813979.
4. Krenn S, Gutwald R, Bönigk M, Krenn V. Dental Apical Inflammation Score (DAIS): histopathological scoring for the evaluation of the apical inflammatory activity and local bone destruction. Pathol Res Pract 2020;216153223. 32992098.
5. Torabinejad M, Eby WC, Naidorf IJ. Inflammatory and immunological aspects of the pathogenesis of human periapical lesions. J Endod 1985;11:479–488. 3913729.
6. Herrera V, Wendie E. Inflamación. Rev Actual Clínica 2014;43:2261–2265.
7. Moore TL, Weiss TD. Mediators of inflammation. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1985;14:247–262. 3936177.
8. Rosenberg PA. Clinical strategies for managing endodontic pain. Endod Topics 2002;3:78–92.
9. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2008;41:91–99. 17956561.
10. Vera J, Ochoa J, Romero M, Vazquez-Carcaño M, Ramos-Gregorio CO, Aguilar RR, Cruz A, Sleiman P, Arias A. Intracanal cryotherapy reduces postoperative pain in teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Endod 2018;44:4–8. 29079057.
11. Kowal MA. Review of physiological effects of cryotherapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1983;5:66–73. 18806430.
12. Vera J, Ochoa-Rivera J, Vazquez-Carcaño M, Romero M, Arias A, Sleiman P. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy on reducing root surface temperature. J Endod 2015;41:1884–1887. 26433855.
13. Keskin C, Özdemir Ö, Uzun İ, Güler B. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy on pain after single-visit root canal treatment. Aust Endod J 2017;43:83–88. 27699913.
14. Gundogdu EC, Arslan H. Effects of various cryotherapy applications on postoperative pain in molar teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis: a preliminary randomized prospective clinical trial. J Endod 2018;44:349–354. 29398090.
15. Alharthi AA, Aljoudi MH, Almaliki MN, Almalki MA, Sunbul MA. Effect of intra-canal cryotherapy on post-endodontic pain in single-visit RCT: a randomized controlled trial. Saudi Dent J 2019;31:330–335. 31337936.
16. Ramírez K, Quesada-Yamasaki D, Fornaguera-Trias JA. A protocol to perform systemic lipopolysacharide (LPS) challenge in rats. Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2019;21:53–66.
17. Aldapa-Vega G, Pastelín-Palacios R, Isibasi A, Moreno-Eutimio MA, López-Macías C. Modulation of immune response by bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Alergia 2016;63:293–302. 27560917.
18. Maitra U, Deng H, Glaros T, Baker B, Capelluto DG, Li Z, Li L. Molecular mechanisms responsible for the selective and low-grade induction of proinflammatory mediators in murine macrophages by lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 2012;189:1014–1023. 22706082.
19. Gao Y, You X, Liu Y, Gao F, Zhang Y, Yang J, Yang C. Induction of autophagy protects human dental pulp cells from lipopolysaccharide-induced pyroptotic cell death. Exp Ther Med 2020;19:2202–2210. 32104285.
20. Fayyad DM, Abdelsalam N, Hashem N. Cryotherapy: a new paradigm of treatment in endodontics. J Endod 2020;46:936–942. 32386857.
21. Watkins AA, Johnson TV, Shrewsberry AB, Nourparvar P, Madni T, Watkins CJ, Feingold PL, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Staley CA, Master VA. Ice packs reduce postoperative midline incision pain and narcotic use: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:511–517. 25081937.
22. Hubbard TJ, Denegar CR. Does cryotherapy improve outcomes with soft tissue injury? J Athl Train 2004;39:278–279. 15496998.
23. Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician 2004;7:395–399. 16858479.
24. Sadaf D, Ahmad MZ, Onakpoya IJ. Effectiveness of intracanal cryotherapy in root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Endod 2020;46:1811–1823.e1. 32916207.
25. Gupta A, Aggarwal V, Gurawa A, Mehta N, Abraham D, Singh A, Jala S, Chauhan N. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy on postendodontic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2021;21:15–27. 33585681.
26. Almohaimede A, Al-Madi E. Is intracanal cryotherapy effective in reducing postoperative endodontic pain? an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:11750. 34831517.
27. Hespanhol FG, Guimarães LS, Antunes LA, Antunes LS. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: systematic review with meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod 2022;47e30. 36090511.
28. Kumari N, Kaur H, Choudhary R, Yeluri R. Comparative evaluation of intracanal cryotherapy and curcumin as a final irrigant in reducing post endodontic pain in primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2022;40:297–301. 36260471.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

The 5 sites of the rats and their allocation to positive control (PC1 and PC2) and experimental groups (E1 and E2).

NC, negative control group.

Table 1

Percentage (%) of specimens per group and category, detailing the presence and degree of inflammation, hemorrhage, and neutrophils

Group Acute inflammation Degree of inflammation Hemorrhage Neutrophils
Absent Moderate and acute Absent Mild Moderate Intense Absent Mild Moderate Mild Moderate and acute
Cryotherapy, 1 min - 100 - 50 33.3 16.7 66.7 - 33.3 66.7 33.3
Cryotherapy, 5 min 60 40 80 20 - - 100 - - 100 -
Negative 100 - 100 - - - 100 - - 100 -
Positive 1 - 100 - 16.7 83.3 - 66.7 16.7 16.7 83.3 16.7
Positive 2 - 100 12.7 87.3 - 60 40 - 100 -

Figure 2

(A) Negative control showing the absence of inflammation. (B) Positive control showing the presence of hemorrhage and inflammation. (C) Presence of inflammation and abundant hemorrhage.

Figure 3

(A, B) Negative control showing the presence of fibroblasts and a few neutrophils. (C) Presence of a few neutrophils in an experimental group 2 (E2) sample. (D) Absence of inflammation or hemorrhage in an E2 sample.