Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
<i xmlns="">In vivo</i> quantitative analysis of remineralization effect of remineralization solution "R" of incipient enamel dental caries


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

In vivo quantitative analysis of remineralization effect of remineralization solution "R" of incipient enamel dental caries

Article information

Restor Dent Endod. 2002;27(2):175-182
Publication date (electronic) : 2002 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.2.175
Myung-Eun Kim, Il-young Jung, Kee-Yeon Kum, Chang-young Lee, Byoung-Duck Roh
Department of Conservative Dentistry, college of dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.

Abstract

Dental caries is a chronic disease that causes the destruction of tooth structure by the interaction of plaque bacteria, food debris, and saliva.

There has been attempts to induce remineralization by supersaturating the intra-oral environment around the surface enamel, where there is incipient caries.

In this study, supersaturated remineralized solution "R" was applied to specimens with incipient enamel caries, and the quantitative ananlysis of remineralization was evaluated using microradiography. Thirty subjects volunteered to participate in this study. Removable appliances were constructed for the subjects, and the enamel specimen with incipient caries were embedded in the appliances. The subjects wore the intra-oral appliance for 15 days except while eating and sleeping.

The removable appliance were soaked in supersaturated solution "R", saline, or Senstime® to expose the specimen to those solutions three times a day, 5 minutes each time. After 15 days, microradiography was retaken to compare and evaluate remineralization.

The results were as the following:

1. The ratio of remineralized area to demineralized area was significantly higher in the supersaturated solution "R" and Senstime® than in the saline. (p<0.05)

2. Remineralization in the supersaturated buffer solution "R" occurred in the significantly deeper parts of the tooth, compared to the Senstime® group containing high concentration of fluoride.(p<0.05)

As in the above results, the remineralization effect of remineralized buffer solution "R" on incipient enamel caries has been proven. For clinical utilization, further studies on soft tissue reaction and the effect on dentin and cementum are necessary.

In conclusion compared to commercially available fluoride solution, remineralization solution "R" showed better remineralization effect on early enamel caries lesion, so it is considered as effecient solution for clinical application.

Keywords: Enamel caries; Remineralization solution; Remineralization; Removable oral appliance; Microradiography

References

1. Arends J, Shuthof J, Jongebloed WL. Lesion depth and microhardness indentations on artificial white spot lesions. Caries Res 1980. 14190–195.
2. Backer Dirks O. Posteruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 1966. 45503–511.
3. Brudevold F, McCann HG, Gron P. Caries resistant teeth as related to the chemistry of enamel. Wolstenholm 1965. London: 121 Churchill;
4. Chow LC, Takagi S. Remineralization of Root Lesions with Concentrated Calcium and Phosphate Silutions. Dent Mater J 1995. 1431–36.
5. Clarkson BH, Krell D, Wefel JS, Crall J, Feagin FF. In vitro caries-like lesion produced by Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus using sucrose and starch. J Dent Res 1987. 66795–798.
6. Dawes C, Weatherell JA. Kinetics of fluoride in the oral fluids. J Dent Res 1990. 69638.
7. Exterkate RAM, Damen JJM, Ten Cate JM. A single-section model for enamel de- and remineralization suties 1 The effects of different Ca/P ratios in Remineralization solutions. J Dent Res 1993. 721599–1603.
8. Hay DI, Smith DJ, Schluckebier , Moreno EC. Relationship between concentration of human salivary statherin and inhibition of calcium phosphate precipitation in stimulated human parotid saliva. J Dent Res 1984. 63857–863.
9. Heilman JR, Wefel JS. Effect of remineralization on demineralized root surfaces. J Dent Res 1989. 68351.
10. Herkstr ter FM, Noordmans J, ten Bosch JJ. Wavelength-independent microradiography: Its use to measure mineral changes in curved and thick samples. Caries Res 1990. 24399.
11. Johnson M, Richardson CF, Bergey EJ, Levine MJ, Nancollas GH. The effect of human salivary crystatins and statherin on hydroxyapatite crystallization. Arch Oral Biol 1978. 23993–996.
12. Koulourdes T. Implication of remineraliztion in the tratment of dental caries in processing symposium on current topics in dental caries in commemoration of the decenial anniversary of Hihon university school of dentistry at Matsudo 1982. Matsudo, Japan: 198.
13. Larsen MJ. Cemically induced in vitro lesions in dental enamel. Scand J Dent Res 1974. 82496–509.
14. Larsen MJ. Degrees of saturation with respect to apatite in parotid saliva at various pH values. Scand J Dent Res 1975. 837–12.
15. Margolis HC, Murphy BJ, Moreno EC. Development of caries-like lesions in partially saturated lactate buffers. Caries Res 1985. 1936–45.
16. Margolis HC, Moreno EC, Murphy BJ. Effect fo low levels of fluoride in solution on enamel deminalization. J Dent Res 1986. 6523–29.
17. Mellberg JG, Ripa LW, Leske GS. Fluoride in preventive dentistry, theory and clinical application. Quintessence 1983. 151–179.
18. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. Chemistry of enamel subsurface demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 1974. 53226–235.
19. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. Chemistry of enamel subsurface demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 1974. 53226–235.
20. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Helgeland K. Alkali soluble and alkali insoluble fluoride retention in demineralized enamel in vivo. Scand J Dent Res 1983. 91200.
21. Silverstone LM. Remineralization and enamel caries new concepts. Dent Update 1983. 10261–273.
22. Silverstone LM. Observations on the dark zone in early enamel caries and artificial caries-like lesions. Caries Res 1967. 1260–274.
23. Silverstone LM. Structure of carious enamel, including the early lesion. Oral Sci Rev 1973. 3100–160.
24. Sperber GH, Bunnocore MG. Enamel surface in whitw spot formation. J Dent Res 1963. 42724–731.
25. Ten Bosch JJ, van der Mei HC, Borsboom PCF. Optical monitor of in vitro caries. Caries Res 1984. 18540–548.
26. Ten Cate JM, Jongebloed WL, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro IV. Influence of and diphonates in short and long term remineralization. Caries Res 1981. 1560–69.
27. Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro III A study of the deposition mechanism. Caries Res 1980. 14351–358.
28. Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res 1977. 11277–286.
29. Theuns HM, Van Dijk JWE, Driessens FCM, Groeneveld A. Effect of time, degree of saturation, pH and acid concentration of buffer solutions on the rate of in-vitro demineralization of human enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1985. 3037–42.
30. Thylstrup A, Fejershov O. Textbook of clinical cariology 1994. Second editionth ed. 231.
31. Thylstrup A, Fejershov O. Textbook of clinical cariology 1994. Second editionth ed. 240.
32. Wefel JS. Effects of fluorides on careis development and progression using intraoral models. J Dent Res 1990. 69626.
33. Wei SHY. Clinical uses of fluorides 1985. Lea & Febiger; 16–24.
34. Kum KY, Lee CY. The effect of four kinds of acid and concentration on the formation of artificial carious lesion in human tooth enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1996. 21470–488.
35. Kim MK, Kum KY, Lee CY. The influence of ph on remineralization of artificial dental caries. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1997. 22193–208.
36. Kim SR, Lee CY, Kum KY. The remineralizing effects of early enamel car10us lesion by supersaturated buffer solution under ph cycling model. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2001. 26341–349.
37. Kim JB, Choi YJ, Back DI, Shin SC, Kim DK. Clinical Preventive Dentistry 1991. Iuchulpansa; 193–218.
38. Park SH, Lee CY, Lee CS. The effect of acid concentration and ph of lactate buffer solution on the progress of artificial caries lesion in human tooth enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1993. 18277–290.
39. Park JW, Hur B, Lee CY. The effects of the degree of saturation of acidulated buffer solutions in enamel and dentin remineralization and afm observation of hydroxyapatite crystals. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2000. 25459–473.
40. Oh HS, Kum KY, Ro BD, Lee CY. The influence of ph on the formation of artificial root caries in acid buffer solution. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1999. 24495–502.
41. Lee CY. Artificial caries formation in acid buffering solution. Yonsei Dent J 1992. 734–41.
42. Han WS, Kum KY, Lee CY. The influence of fluoride on remineralization of artificial dental caries. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1996. 21161–173.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2002 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
(open-access) :

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Drawing of enamel specimen

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Removable oral appliance attached with demineralized enamel specimen

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Quantitative mineral volume change(%) of enamel

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Average mineral volume change of enamel specimen with remineralization solution "R"

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

Average mineral voulme change of enamel specimen with saline

Fig. 6

Fig. 6

Average mineral voulme change of enamel specimen with Senstime

Table 1

Initial composition of demineralization solution

Table 1

Table 2

Initial composition of remineralization solution

Table 2

Table 3

Experimental solution

Table 3

Table 4

Remineralization peak depth from the surface

Table 4

*significantly different(p<0.05)